Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Military History Visualized" channel.

  1. Found the Wheraboo.
    8
  2. No. He already wanted to destroy the USSR in the 20's.
    6
  3. Ridiculous statement
    6
  4. Haha! Javelin goes brrrrr!
    5
  5. Simultaneously alot of Russians think they were the victims of German agression, forgetting the 1939-1941 period in which they worked together to carve up Central and Eastern Europe.
    5
  6. ​ @MoneyIsSilver Is this 'destroyed Royal navy' in the room with us now?
    5
  7. You do realise we can compare German and Soviet sources, right?
    4
  8. No it isn't.
    3
  9. ​ @gr6373  Which ironically was not really a thing.
    3
  10. 4. Now you're just arguing that if the Japanese weren't militaristic, totalitarians they could have won. You are changing the entire premise of the war.
    3
  11. That is another myth. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02dmyj1
    3
  12. Calls everyone else a nazi while supporting Russia's war crimes. Classic.
    3
  13. This is completely false. If you have a problem with their methodology, publish a paper on it. This is like doubting the validity of vaccines with a facebook post. You can't justify calling into doubt historiography without evidence.
    3
  14. The Soviets also used Nazi scientists in their rocket program when reconstructing the V2
    2
  15. Imagine getting your info from google instead of historians... Do you get your financial advice from Facebook or a Nigerian Prince?
    2
  16. The guy who called anybody who disagreed with him "holocaust deniers"? He can't argue in good faith.
    2
  17. History Matters did a video on that
    2
  18. You lost 1,400+ tanks Vatnik. The most recent movements on the front is when you lost Kherson and the Kharkiv region.
    2
  19. Yes, he said that.
    2
  20. You support the agressor.
    2
  21. Russia did not invade because of the land lease and will not stop its war if the lend lease ends.
    2
  22. He still would have lost to the USSR
    2
  23. Very relevant right now.
    2
  24. True. The Russians are also using them for fire support, but what this also means is that their destroyed modern tanks are not getting enough replacements.
    2
  25.  @БубликПомидорович  By that logic Finland was right to side with the Axis in 1941. By that logic all of Ukraine would have been right to side against the USSR.
    2
  26. You do not understand the basis of international relations, do you?
    2
  27. 1. The US stopped selling American fuel to Japan over the Japanese occupation of French Indochina. 2. Retaliation over what? Japan attacked Pearl Harbour and the Phillipines. That is a war, not mere retalliation. 3. Not by 1941. The US had expanded its army significantly in 1940 and 1941. Japan had a massive army 4. ??? 5. Yeah.
    2
  28. Your entire narrative lacks a single shred of evidence and is almost incomprehensible die to bad grammar.
    2
  29.  @JohnSmith-il7jn  Japan had no honour. Their boshido was a 19th century creation and a farce. It was not at all the conduct of Samurai.
    2
  30. Search by new and you will find people still arguing Japan could have won. So much for "obvious".
    2
  31. So you want segregation to return...
    2
  32. Court martialled with pre-determined outcomes.
    2
  33. ​ @BST-lm4po That's bullshit Nazi.
    2
  34. Clear strawman fallacy.
    2
  35. This was by far the least credible comment I have seen yet.
    2
  36. ​​ @f430ferrari5 Biased? Are you serious right now? 12:41 He even says that even if all Japenese ships in service in Devember 1941 survived and all Japanese construction programs were finished they could not handle the US fleet put to sea by 1944.
    2
  37. ​​ @grandcanyon-d4d Germany had nothing as advanced as Allied computing, radar or synthetic fuel, let alone an atomic bomb..
    2
  38. Its the carriers that are important.
    2
  39. You mean the guy that was debunked yet still get's cited by people not understanding what a literature review is?
    2
  40. 7:14 watch the video
    1
  41. You made that up.
    1
  42. That is a lie. Oryx and the ISW show they have been using their best equipment and best units
    1
  43. Pretty sure advocating for the use of nuclear weapons can be considered inciting terrorism.
    1
  44.  @patrickfuller6025  He is not excusing anything. What are you talking about?
    1
  45. Based on what?
    1
  46. ???
    1
  47. He has been debunked.
    1
  48. The US does not produce spare parts for Leopard tanks.
    1
  49. I don't believe you. Also, you're not a journalist.
    1
  50. Poor English, ad hominem and no argument.
    1