Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Ukraine Veteran: Why Leopard 1 is better than Leopard 2 for Ukraine" video.

  1. Calls everyone else a nazi while supporting Russia's war crimes. Classic.
    3
  2. Yes, he said that.
    2
  3. You support the agressor.
    2
  4. Russia did not invade because of the land lease and will not stop its war if the lend lease ends.
    2
  5. True. The Russians are also using them for fire support, but what this also means is that their destroyed modern tanks are not getting enough replacements.
    2
  6. You do not understand the basis of international relations, do you?
    2
  7. Clear strawman fallacy.
    2
  8. 7:14 watch the video
    1
  9. Pretty sure advocating for the use of nuclear weapons can be considered inciting terrorism.
    1
  10. The US does not produce spare parts for Leopard tanks.
    1
  11. Poor English, ad hominem and no argument.
    1
  12. As assault guns? Sure. As tank replacements for breakthroughs? No.
    1
  13. He never said that. Your fallacy is the strawman. All this video explains is why this tank can fulfill certain roles better. It has no bearing on not sending certain tanks. He never said that.
    1
  14. He litterly explains their role as assault guns.
    1
  15. Not an argument
    1
  16. Typical bullying behaviour.
    1
  17. You did not even watch the video. He adressed your points.
    1
  18. That's not true. You'd need alot of large combat drones for that task and those drones stand no chance against multi-layered air defences
    1
  19. Perun, the Chieftain and every military on the planet disagree, buddy
    1
  20. 7:14 in the video
    1
  21. They are footing the bill mate. Both in GDP and the loss of life.
    1
  22. If you have no counterarguments...
    1
  23. He never said Germany was the first to supply them. You clearly did not listen carefully. Rheinmetal was talking about the possibility of supplying leopards before any government talked about supplying tanks.
    1
  24. You clearly missed his point and insulted him also. How dissapointing.
    1
  25. Why would the Leopard tank, if used in the South, need to drive over bridges? Would the Ruusian not face the same problem? Also what do you mean by "hus bridges"?
    1
  26. What a disgusting comment.
    1
  27. Your denial of the right of self-determination makes your supposed love for human right transparently hollow.
    1
  28. ​​ @tombaur8316  Russia has lost 2,000+ tanks as per Oryx. I suggest you check your sources before claiming those organisations back you up.
    1
  29. Source: it came to me in a dream
    1
  30. You clearly did not watch the video. They are not meant for anti-tank roles
    1
  31. Proof it was corruption. I do not want baseless conjecture.
    1
  32. Ukraine never claimed to be the second most powerful army on the planet. That is the difference
    1
  33. ??? It is an informative video on the efficacy of the Leopard 1. It is not a call to Germany to supply tanks.
    1
  34. Litterly adressed in the video.
    1