Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Why Russia Isn't Using Stealth Su-57s, How Many They Actually Have, and How Effective They'd Be" video.

  1. Well their claims about avalibility and the numbers that were going to be produced were so far removed from reality it is hard not to take everything they say with a massive grain of salt.
    47
  2. ​ @Pope-enhiemer  F-22s actually exist.
    20
  3. See Perun.
    8
  4. Did it shoot down superman? I half expect your "sources" to claim such a feat.
    7
  5. As of the 30th of December, 2023 over 980 F-35s have been produced
    7
  6. Prove it
    6
  7. The USSR did and Russia failed to utilise it.
    4
  8. Considering the commercial GPS duck-taped to the cockpits of many Russian jets I doubt Russia has any such radar in any of their planes.
    3
  9. Dimitri, that is the second year in a row you have claimed Ukraine already lost.
    3
  10. Last I checked NATO has not deployed combat troops in Ukraine mate.
    2
  11. No?
    2
  12. Source: the Russian Ministry of defense. Their source: trust me bro (No footage found.)
    2
  13. You providing zero arguments for your conclusion or just making up figures makes your opinion pretty useless.
    2
  14. We don't have to prove a negative mate.
    2
  15. You don't know what air superiority means. 😅
    2
  16. You either don't understand stealth or purposefully misrepresent it. Also: If stealth is not worth it why is Russia trying to produce stealth jets?
    2
  17. No, there isn't any footage of the Su-57 in Ukraine.
    2
  18. So you are just throwing away the lives of your own soldiers because you can't be bothered? That is some terrible propaganda.
    2
  19. So you are just throwing away the lives of your own soldiers because you can't be bothered? That is some terrible propaganda.
    2
  20. AWACS? Where did you get that idea from?
    2
  21. Other then the footage of the crash sites? Or do you think Russian pilots are just drunk?
    1
  22. ​ @sH-ed5yf There are no air losses in Ba Sing Se
    1
  23. The return of the "we are keeping our real weapons in reserve" frame. Straight from RT and Sputnik. You instinctively lie
    1
  24. Red flag excersises provide data.
    1
  25. Prove it
    1
  26. So your logic is that Russia is not supporting its troops, causing needless deaths, because it can't be bothered to use its totally real Wunderwaffen? Sounds like you really hate Russian soldiers.
    1
  27. India left the program and it is not a contender in India's fighter competitions.
    1
  28. Claims made without evidence can be refuted without evidence
    1
  29. Source: it came to me in a dream
    1
  30. Get real.
    1
  31. This is such a blatant lie
    1
  32. ​ @desertodavid Nobody takes Tucker Carlson fanboys seriously
    1
  33. Bruh.
    1
  34. All stealth is detectable on radar. The RCS is not non-existent. It just means planes will be much closer before detection and target locks can be tricky.
    1
  35. Except they have...
    1
  36. ​ @CloneDAnon Is SEAD foreign to the Russian air force?
    1
  37. ​@Zeus-tm6jfVictim complex much?
    1
  38. You were never subscribed.
    1
  39. The more blatantly lying trolls are the worse.
    1
  40. ​ @sH-ed5yf He can't even be bothered to look up the name of the jet he claims to know so much about
    1
  41. ??
    1
  42. You are incorrect.
    1
  43. ??
    1
  44. Obvious bot is obvious
    1
  45. Obvious bot is obvious
    1
  46. Russia used this frame a year ago as well. Its mass use in this comment section implies they are relying on it again.
    1
  47. Google is your friend
    1
  48. Disinformation.
    1
  49. Prove it
    1
  50. Lol. Explain why so many nations are buying or developing stealth fighters if they are pointless?
    1
  51. ​ @bendreczko9054 Russian talking points also include culture wars. They are unhinged
    1
  52. Russia isn't the US' peer
    1