Comments by "Rūsī" (@rusi6219) on "Python is 71x Slower, Uses 75x More Energy, Than C" video.

 @MrFunny01 Java has 20+ years of hacky optimisations so it does make sense
9
L + meme + skill issue
8
@ゾカリクゾ not the kernel but lots of third party apps and utilities
6
Pascal bit makes sense since Pascal was genuinely superior to C (i love C)
6
Well good thing that all you need to do decent C is to just be okay at it and know how to read read to know what operations are unsafe as the spec literally tells you that
5
 @TapetBart then why is everything so slow even if you don't use anything else e.g. try to load the file explorer and leave it running for a day
3
They'll just fudge the numbers and claim victory like always
3
@kensmith5694 still a degree of learned skill
3
Because it's not release-ready yet
2
Great now string together a similar essay about the Rust Foundation fudging numbers...oh wait you'll never do that
2
@mmstick come back when Rust has real data not random numbers strung together in such a way as to make it look like the super duper 10x king of programming languages
2
That would be Rust, sir
1
Yeah, python is an amazing toy language and that's not a bad thing at all. It's just that python people love to think of it as a serious language for serious work for some reason.
1
@A3A3adamsan exactly. Already demanding disciplines applying an overly demanding tool.
1
71:75 is a pretty good ratio tbh i would expect it to consume a lot more resources than that
1
@TapetBart I did not make an argument I simply asked a question, is it so hard to read a question as a question? Or are you just picking a fight for the sake of it, because I have more important things to do than to devote my time to a random on the internet.
1
Thats fine as long as its treated the way it should be treated and isnt pushed litsrally everywhere just wasting resources. At least Python isnt pretending to be something its not like Rust.
1
Huh?
1