General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
zac
Munchies
comments
Comments by "zac" (@zac3126) on "How-To: Make Roasted Beef Rump Cap with Analiese Gregory" video.
otVu Kinda disrespectful lol
15
Looks okay, I feel like most of us can make something like this no problem, I prefer seeing just a little more complicated recipes from your chefs. This is just a little too basic for me. I'm sure it's good though.
9
Sketchyyo Religious or not the church has effected people in positive ways. I don't mind of someone isn't religious, I just think this attitude that non religious people have towards religious jusy as bad as the extreme moron christians. Not saying it happened here, or with you gents, I just think it's important to respect things people believe important
7
Jamison Melendez no one cares.
3
Judas Iscariot It's not intelligent to dismiss. Or ridicule. That's my point. I'm sort of done with this conversation. No disrespect. I just feel that neither of us is going to change our positions, nor should we, so let's just say good talk and g'day.
3
Jamison Melendez Surely they must have programs for under privelaged inner city kids like you? Grammar and spelling goes a long way. I'm sorry you think that being first on a youtube video makes you special, it clearly means alot to you little guy, I just wish you had a worthwhile life so this didn't mean so much! :)
3
ItsSomeDeadGuy They truly are just as bad as each other, it is a civil rights issue you pillock. It is just as wrong to shame someone for their religion as it is to coerce or preach it to those who don't beleive.
3
Judas Iscariot You're truly being difficult for the sake of being difficult. "Beliefs are the foundation of actions". To YOU. Your point of view is not law, that has been my entire point sir, the fact that you're taking my civility and continuing to tell me I don't understand your outlook as shameful on your part. Having a debate with you is like debating a mollusk, because your mind is closed to that which you do not agree with, or understand a connection too. Which is why this conversation, despite my best intentions to be civil, has become pointless. I don't beleive in God either, but I would never have the indecency to tell someone that believes something for reasons I can't comprehend wrong. It's about being an intelligent human. I'll state my entire point right here, as if was before you tried to be the big man sir. It is wrong to push religion on to the unwilling, but if is equally as wrong to shame the religious for their beleifs. My whole point was let live on something that effects nothing in your life unless you allow it to. Good day.
3
Judas Iscariot Your reality is not the same reality as other people. If the worst that you can say about me is that I'm comfortable with what I beleive, and will never chastise you for what you beleive, I'm not all that bad.
3
Judas Iscariot Yes, but look at some of the above comments my good man, was that response to relegion not ignorant? There are many shades of ignorance my friends.
3
tabaks uh huh, you're the kind of guy I'm talking about. I support your right to believe what you beleive, even though I beleive different. When you condemn something that you don't understand in the same way, you become a theif as well. Grow up.
3
Judas Iscariot I understand, I just feel that we need to let people with those beleifs be from time to time, as it's their civil right. We can throw all the education we want at them, people will still beleive what they want, so I figure at that point, why berate them? Catch my meaning sir?
3
ItsSomeDeadGuy That's not what I'm saying, I'm saying the WAY some people attack religious people for their beliefs is a breach of their civil rights. Big difference.
3
Judas Iscariot I think you're all missing my point. I'm stating that criticism is bound to happen, but there is a proper way to do it, swearing at people and calling them stupid for why they beleive is what I am saying I don't agree with.
3
Judas Iscariot There is a difference between examination and discussion and oppression no? An atheist saying, "I hate all religious people, they're stupid and useless" is a targeted event. Much like the Christians targeting gays, it's a cycle, almost like race issues if you think about it. It's not the discussion I disagree with fellas, I agree with that aspect, I'm stating that there is a proper way to do it. Berating and attempting to shame, is much different from what you stated, as discussion.
3
ItsSomeDeadGuy It's amazing how some people refuse to see the other side of beleifs when I'm definitley seeing theirs, that's how mature conversation works. It's not an exchanging of ideas if you refuse to see where the other is coming from, that my friend is what makes people ignorant. Ignorance is not someone believing something different, ignorance is believing your way is the only way it should work despite the fact that there are billions of people on this planet.
3
Judas Iscariot You have said the same thing multiple times, I'm perfectly capable of reading it. Repeating yourself over and over is doing nothing to change what I said, which has nothing to do with what you're saying. I said when you condemn someone for their beliefs, that do not affect you, or your world. It's part of the problem. Like it or not. This really is my last reply though. I feel that we keep missing each other's point, or perhaps some people in this conversation are ignoring the others logic. Cheers mate. Good day and good luck.
2
Judas Iscariot That having been said I appreciate that you did not resort to their level, and it takes a wise man to discuss it in a civil manner, as you did.
2
Judas Iscariot I don't have to believe in what they beleive in, I beleive in their right to believe what they want without recourse or criticism. It's the 21st century. Act like it.
2
Judas Iscariot Haha I'm wrong because I beleive in everyone's right to feel valid? Strange world bub. Enjoy that high horse. I was patient, I was pleasant. I'm not wrong at all that everyone deserves to feel they have a place, sadly it's men like you that leave no room for acceptance, you'll never get what you want big guy. I at least can look at something I don't agree with and let them live their lives. Nothing you mentioned affects you unless you let it, as a matter of fact, your attitude reflects your opinion in the religious. You have a God complex. See ya later. I'm sure you'll have another long winded reply despite the fact that I'm not religious and my entire point was to be good to all people. You're more concerned with being right, than being a good man. I'm not wasting any more of my vacation in a discussion with you.
2
Judas Iscariot You talked about a constructive conversation, to have a constructive conversation you need to first remember that you are not always right, and that everything in life is subjective. You use big words to appear intelligent yet you lack the most fundamental trait of intelligence, acceptance. Proven knowledge is not the only thing that makes someone intelligent. Your level of social intelligence and morality is clearly lost, as you seem to beleive myself, a man who does not beleive in God, is wrong simply because I beleive those who do have the right to do so without ridicule. As we share this earth.
2
Judas Iscariot Your hostility to different beliefs in particular borders on the fanatical–an irony that apparently escapes your notice.
2
Judas Iscariot Nor is your ignorance. On your bike.
2
ItsSomeDeadGuy I wasn't triggered? I stated my opinion , only ones Herr that seem triggered are you gents. Not comfortable enough with yourself to respect other people's beliefs just because their different?
2
Fellow Human Lmao, I wasn't even shitting on it, grow up :)
2
Hector Wasn't my point at all, it was my personal preference, the better question is why accost my opinion on the video when I was nothing but polite about it? I simply stated that the recipe in this video held little interest for me personally. I don't need to explain something about my opinion of the video that was already explained perfectly. If you're offended enough to comment over the nothing that my statement is perhaps you shouldn't be on the internet without supervision. Have a wonderful day.
2
LordDude3 Perhaps I will, but either way I will continue to state my opinion in the polite manner I just did. If anyone on YouTube decides that politely stating that this dish just didn't do it for me equals free range to act like an immature git, it's not my problem. I'm almost astounded that in this day and age one person stating that ONE video on a channel that I actually love wasn't interesting to me can be attempted to be turned into an argument, almost. Youtube is sadly a very poor community that way.
2
Hector There was no assault on my ego, quite presumptuous of you. I simply stated that you took my original comment the wrong way. I was nothing but polite. I appreciate the attempt at trying to make it looks as though I was at any point unreasonable. Later.
2
ItsSomeDeadGuy Uh huh, says the man who feels compelled to follow me around like a lapdog.
2
Hector I took nothing personally, I simply explained I have nothing to explain. I like the channel. This video didn't do it for me. That's all I ever said. No real need to be debated over being polite.
1