Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "Gravitas: India now has close to 200,000 soldiers on the China border" video.

  1. why not 400000, they are good targets anyway
    6
  2. India should take this opportunity to take back Aksai chin and revenge for the total defeat and humiliation of 1962, looking forward to starting this war soon. from 1000 yrs of history, Hindus lost all wars, to Persians, to Turks, to Mongols, to British, to whoever wanted to occupy India, now it is time for India to show it can at least defeat China, that is the minimum request to prove you deserve to be a nation to exist in the world. As Karl Marx said: "Indian society has no history at all, at least no known history. What we call its history, is but the history of the successive intruders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society. The question, therefore, is not whether the English had a right to conquer India, but whether we are to prefer India conquered by the Turk, by the Persian, by the Russian, to India conquered by the Briton." now it is China's turn if you google "Wang Xuance", you will also learn a story that a single Chinese diplomat to India, just borrowed some army from Tibet and Nepal, totally defeated Indian army 1600 yr ago and captured the king of India ( Aluonashun (supposedly Arunāsva)) at the time and sent him back to Xian to Chinese Tang Emperor. the emperor ordered to make it a statue to show he kneel down in front of the emperor. People say, history will repeat itself
    2
  3. India should take this opportunity to take back Aksai chin and revenge for the total defeat and humiliation of 1962, looking forward to starting this war soon. from 1000 yrs of history, Hindus lost all wars, to Persians, to Turks, to Mongols, to British, to whoever wanted to occupy India, now it is time for India to show it can at least defeat China, that is the minimum request to prove you deserve to be a nation to exist in the world. As Karl Marx said: "Indian society has no history at all, at least no known history. What we call its history, is but the history of the successive intruders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society. The question, therefore, is not whether the English had a right to conquer India, but whether we are to prefer India conquered by the Turk, by the Persian, by the Russian, to India conquered by the Briton." now it is China's turn if you google "Wang Xuance", you will also learn a story that a single Chinese diplomat to India, just borrowed some army from Tibet and Nepal, totally defeated Indian army 1600 yr ago and captured the king of India ( Aluonashun (supposedly Arunāsva)) at the time and sent him back to Xian to Chinese Tang Emperor. the emperor ordered to make it a statue to show he kneel down in front of the emperor. People say, history will repeat itself you can put same number of troops there but you cannot spend the same amount money on them there, because on surface China's military budget is 3 times of India's but actual spending on training and military are much more, since in your budget 60% are salary and pension, that takes $40 billion from your total $67 billion, that only $27 billion left, China with 30% salary, that is with $210 billion, take out salary, $140 billion left compare to India's $27 billion, that is 5.18 times of India's which means China has 5 times more money on prepare this war. Also, for salary, India has $20 billion a year for 1.2 million soldiers as salary, but China has $70 billion for Chinese 2 million army, that makes average of $35000 per soldier per year as salary, India soldier gets 20 billion/1.2 million so average is $16667 per soldier per year, or PLA soldier gets 2 times more salary than Indian soldier.
    2
  4. how about we do not invade TW but invade India first??
    2
  5. you can put same number of troops there but you cannot spend the same amount money on them there, because on surface China's military budget is 3 times of India's but actual spending on training and military are much more, since in your budget 60% are salary and pension, that takes $40 billion from your total $67 billion, that only $27 billion left, China with 30% salary, that is with $210 billion, take out salary, $140 billion left compare to India's $27 billion, that is 5.18 times of India's which means China has 5 times more money on prepare this war. Also, for salary, India has $20 billion a year for 1.2 million soldiers as salary, but China has $70 billion for Chinese 2 million army, that makes average of $35000 per soldier per year as salary, India soldier gets 20 billion/1.2 million so average is $16667 per soldier per year, or PLA soldier gets 2 times more salary than Indian soldier.
    1
  6. Just fight, if you win, you can take Lhasa that is about 400 km from border, if we win, we will take Delhi, which is also about 400 km from border, see you guys at Gate of India.
    1
  7. Dalai lama means nothing to modern Tibet, they will shoot him if he is in the way without any hesitation.
    1
  8.  @sachinsingh5329  Indians never go to see a 3 D map, if they do, they would realize, China is on top of Himalaya plateau, this is God created geology, no man can change it, it will always Chinese rushed down, but Indian needs to climb 4000-5000 meters for attack. This is your fate, you can certainly try to fight Chinese, but you can never win God's will,
    1
  9.  @sachinsingh5329  hah :)) GEEE, what a genius, you just make Indian more difficult, I was trying to make it easier, now you let them know they have to climb over Himalaya mountain first to get into Tibet Plateau
    1
  10.  @sachinsingh5329  your mind so limited, Tibet is 1.2 million sq km, do you know that?? you want to free Tibet, now you said you need climb over Himalaya first, then you need to defend the whole 1.2 million sq km? where you put your army?? how are you going to supply to them?? let you put a 1 million, enough, then how much food and ammunition you need to send to them? how?? If PLA just cut off your supply line, all of your army will starve to death, we use bombers (you do not have any) and who cares if your soldier can live in high place or not? they cannot live without eating that is for sure.
    1
  11.  @sachinsingh5329  hahah , 50 yrs old Jaquars?? haha :))) we have over 1300 3rd gen and above jets, you have 275 Su 30 MKI and 10 Rafale, you do not have S400, but we have it since 2018 your brahmos range 290 km, hah :)) my point is, with all your fighting power, it is impossible for Indian to occupy Tibet, your free Tibet is only a dream, it is totally impossible.
    1
  12.  @sachinsingh5329  you have totally no logic, my point is only on it is impossible for India to "free Tibet" nothing else. you cannot deny it, but dragged all over to other things, not interested in your BS.
    1
  13.  @sachinsingh5329  India should take this opportunity to take back Aksai chin and revenge for the total defeat and humiliation of 1962, looking forward to starting this war soon. from 1000 yrs of history, Hindus lost all wars, to Persians, to Turks, to Mongols, to British, to whoever wanted to occupy India, now it is time for India to show it can at least defeat China, that is the minimum request to prove you deserve to be a nation to exist in the world. As Karl Marx said: "Indian society has no history at all, at least no known history. What we call its history, is but the history of the successive intruders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society. The question, therefore, is not whether the English had a right to conquer India, but whether we are to prefer India conquered by the Turk, by the Persian, by the Russian, to India conquered by the Briton." now it is China's turn if you google "Wang Xuance", you will also learn a story that a single Chinese diplomat to India, just borrowed some army from Tibet and Nepal, totally defeated Indian army 1600 yr ago and captured the king of India ( Aluonashun (supposedly Arunāsva)) at the time and sent him back to Xian to Chinese Tang Emperor. the emperor ordered to make it a statue to show he kneel down in front of the emperor. People say, history will repeat itself you can put same number of troops there but you cannot spend the same amount money on them there, because on surface China's military budget is 3 times of India's but actual spending on training and military are much more, since in your budget 60% are salary and pension, that takes $40 billion from your total $67 billion, that only $27 billion left, China with 30% salary, that is with $210 billion, take out salary, $140 billion left compare to India's $27 billion, that is 5.18 times of India's which means China has 5 times more money on prepare this war. Also, for salary, India has $20 billion a year for 1.2 million soldiers as salary, but China has $70 billion for Chinese 2 million army, that makes average of $35000 per soldier per year as salary, India soldier gets 20 billion/1.2 million so average is $16667 per soldier per year, or PLA soldier gets 2 times more salary than Indian soldier.
    1
  14.  @sachinsingh5329  keep dreaming
    1