Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "China Steps Up Attacks On India's 'Integral Part'; Watch Xi's Latest Provocation | Arunachal Row" video.

  1. put simple words that Indians can understand, "Arunachal Pradesh" is actually a big part of South Tibet. This is based on the McMahon Line, which is not legal. So, the entire "Arunachal Pradesh" is not legal.
    2
  2. no need to worry China, they can only use wood sticks, as shown in Oct 10th 2021, The Express Tribune, with title "Indians furious. ..........."
    1
  3. Good job China! keep going ! The entire issue in the eastern sector between China and India stems from the British's illegal claim to the entire South Tibet through the notorious McMahon Line, a claim that India never obtained before the British, nor could it achieve independently. Now, India is attempting to retain what it could not obtain on its own, but only inherited illegally from its former colonial master. South Tibet was never claimed by the British; the McMahon Line was merely proposed by the British in 1914 as a negotiation tactic with the Chinese government. However, no Chinese government ever agreed to it. This is why Tawang, which should be on the west side of the McMahon Line according to maps, remained under the control of the Tibetan local government throughout the British Raj period, rather than being controlled by the British Raj. Tawang was only occupied on February 14, 1951, not by the British, but by Nehru's dispatched army. The PLA reached Lhasa in October 1952. "Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu today announced that his government will set up a memorial for Major Bob Khathing, an Army officer who commanded a small team of soldiers to establish India's administrative control in Tawang, which borders China, in 1951."
    1
  4. Read UK paper on Tawang, the notorious McMahon line was never accepted by the Chinese government. here is the record of it. "The Simla Conference as a whole failed when the Chinese Government refused to recognize the validity of the initialling done by their delegate Chen I-fan. The Foreign Secretary to the Government of India concludes that "the Simla Convention has not been signed by the Chinese Government or accepted by the Russian Government and is, therefore, for the present invalid." " JOURNAL ARTICLE TAWANG—A CASE STUDY OF BRITISH FRONTIER POLICY IN THE HIMALAYAS LARS-ERIK NYMAN Journal of Asian History Vol. 10, No. 2 (1976), pp. 151-171 (21 pages) Published By: Harrassowitz Verlag Of course I do not expect any Indian would read or care about the fact nor history.
    1
  5. In reality, the only significant obstacle for China concerning India is South Tibet (Zangnan). While Indians may perceive additional obstacles, we are not concerned about those perceptions. It would be in the best interest of both countries to peacefully return South Tibet to China. Otherwise, we will reclaim it by alternative means. Afterward, you may continue to harbor animosity towards China, boycott our products, engage in border skirmishes, or propagate daily falsehoods about China. However, we remain indifferent to these actions. We will pursue our path, and you may pursue yours, even though it may lead to nowhere, with no hope or future, as history has demonstrated.
    1