Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "Ex-NATO Commander Provokes Putin, Advises U.S. Led Bloc To 'Neutralise' This Russian Region | Watch" video.

Because they were/are not at war. You guys are completely incapable of reading! I'll give you a hint: he said "In the event of war", means IF russia goes to war against the Baltic states.
4
NATO isn't at war with russia, so where is the humiliation? You're humiliating yourself! (but to your defense, that's what you always do and do best)
3
NATO's intervention was prompted by Yugoslavia's bloodshed and ethnic cleansing of Albanians, which drove the Albanians into neighbouring countries and had the potential to destabilize the region. Are you defending the Serbian war criminals? Yugoslavia's actions had already provoked condemnation by international organisations and agencies such as the UN, NATO, and various INGOs. Yugoslavia's refusal to sign the Rambouillet Accords was initially offered as justification for NATO's use of force. NATO countries attempted to gain authorisation from the UN Security Council for military action, but were opposed by China and Russia, who indicated that they would veto such a measure. As a result, NATO launched its campaign without the UN's approval, stating that it was a humanitarian intervention. Libya was a UN intervention, not NATO. If Russia was against the intervention in Libya, why didn't they vote against it in the UN Security Council??
1
What was stupid??
1
What is the lunacy?
1
NATO hasn't ASKED any of these nations. They have applied to NATO for membership, to protect them against a more and more aggressive russia!
1
@Peter-xg5fq So a diplomat offering cookies is enough to buy a country?? Must be russia then! What killings are you talking about? The peoples protest under the Orange Revolution were caused by russian interference in elections and corruption. Are you talking about the Macedonian court convict who fled the country to avoid two years in prison?
1
Try what?
1
Try what? And what bullying??
1
@andrewadam7663 Headline?? What about reading what he actually said? It seems to be, for whatever reason, very problematic for you guys! He said "In the event of war". That means IF russia goes to war against the Baltic states.
1
@andrewadam7663 You still didn't manage to read what he actually said?? Not the sharpest tool in box, eh!? He said "In the event of war", means IF russia goes to war against the Baltic states.
1
@andrewadam7663 BS, NATO hasn't ever threatened to go to war with russia. Read the whole story, russia has attacked and invaded Ukraine. They threaten all the former soviet states that now are sovereign countries. So all the countries that have not yet managed to gain NATO membership have been attacked by the Russians, but you fail to see who's the aggressor!!? That says a lot about you!
1
@andrewadam7663 Of course the H T moderators had to delete my answer. Telling the truth was to much for them! NATO has never ever had intentions on going to war with russia. You read the whole story, all the former soviet countries that have not yet gain NATO membership have been attacked by the russians. The only thing holding them back on attacking the baltics, are NATO membership.
1
@andrewadam7663 Let’s try again, NATO has never ever had intentions on going to war with russia. You read the whole story, all the former soviet countries that have not yet gain NATO membership have been attacked by the russians. The only thing holding them back on attacking the Baltics, are NATO membership.
1