Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "NATO Aspirant Sweden Raises Alarm Over Russia; Says Putin’s Ability To Use Nukes Remains Intact" video.

  1.  @bradleypaulus2926  No, this was an excellent reply: "; Ukranians have the right to defend their country against invaders, just like India chases away Chinese invaders. Ukraine is an independent country, no longer part of the Soviet Union since 1989, recognized by the UN with embassies also in New Dehli."
    5
  2. There are no Nato forces in Ukraine. By your logic we could say that Nato forces have the right to attack Belarus, because they chose to be in an alliance with Russia, an enemy of Nato (by your words). Does that feel right, do you think??
    4
  3.  @FK-AIPAC  Stalin and Hitler made a pact (Molotov-Ribbentrop pact) in 1939 to partition the Eastern Europe between them, including Poland. So at the beginning of the ww2, Soviet/Russia was on the Hitler/Nazi side. You don't hear that on russian propaganda.
    3
  4.  @sam-jv6mr  Sam IQ of 65. He said nato FORCES. Again, there are no Nato FORCES in Ukraine. Nato is sending weapons (they have waited to long), so Ukraine can defend themselves.
    2
  5.  @Mikakrombacher  Of course. No one says otherwise.
    2
  6. So you think that there will only be ONE bomb? And no retaliation at all? If there is a nuclear war, the hole world will be affected.
    1
  7.  @alexanderryazanov9435  "Russia did not consider NATO its enemy". Do you really believe that?? NATO was founded in the aftermath of ww2. an alliance to protect each other from any military threats and yes, mainly from Soviet/Russia. Soviet had occupied a part of Eastern Europe and later also attacked Czechoslovakia and Hungary for instance. By the way, Transnistria belongs to Moldova.
    1
  8. Why do they have this right?
    1
  9. They don't need to be be and strong, just wise. Only people with inferiority complex need to be "big and strong". And people living in the Middle Ages.
    1
  10.  @mohamedhussein4124  Why be neutral, when there is a clear offender?
    1
  11.  @alexanderryazanov9435  Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 because there had been bad economic politics over many years. They had spent way to much on the military, so they went bankrupt. and the people wanted more freedom and democracy. After that, Ukraine gave all the nuclear and heavy weapons to Russia with guarantees that the borders shuold be respected. Russia has no right to annex the former member states. Ukraine was founded long before todays Russia. Muscovia/Rus was a vassal state of the Golden Horde, and was centered around a small area around Moscow and north. Not Ukraine at all. Ukraine/Kyiv was founded vastly by a Viking group.
    1
  12.  @eleveneleven572  It doesn't matter what Putin says 30 years later.
    1
  13.  @СЕРГЕЙТкаченко-з1м  Mostly the Nordic Countries. And you can see the map at Wikipedia. Just google/search for "kievan Rus". This land was even bigger than Ukraine. It included Belarus and some parts of todays russia. So IF we shall look to the history and then decide what to do, Russia should give up some land to Ukraine, so should Belarus. Ukraine will of course NOT do that, but this is Putins logic, so why not?
    1
  14.  @Mikakrombacher  There is no problem with russian security. if they stay at home, no ill will come to them.
    1
  15.  @eleveneleven572  Not to me what?? Could you be more clearer? You are right, Poles, Hungarians and Romanians was long trapped in the Soviet Union. Luckily not anymore, and they all support Ukraine.
    1
  16. Why should Sweden stop sending material support to Ukraine? Many countries are sending support to Russia, what's the difference?
    1
  17.  @omoikaneru  Sure, and Oleg of Novgorod was of Nordic origin, most likely norwegian. But so what, should Ukraine and part of Russia belong to Norway? Madness of course! How long back in history should we go? What right has Putin to say "I choose this history". Somehow I understand, Ukraine has "more history" than Russia and Putin envy that.
    1
  18.  @irenagreg7373  I have already replied to this: Sure, and Oleg of Novgorod was of Nordic origin, most likely norwegian. But so what, should Ukraine and part of Russia belong to Norway? Madness of course! How long back in history should we go? What right has Putin to say "I choose this history"??
    1
  19. Putin is the master strategist in the creation of russophobia. Why is attacking Ukraine a security concern? The Nato borders will only be larger, so the "enemy" will only be closer.
    1
  20. Can't you read, they threatens with nukes, not tanks. If they sent tanks, they would be at the bottom of the Baltic Sea.
    1