Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "US University professor suggests 'criticising' Fauci should be federal offence" video.

@quincannon6275 What ever you say, hypocrite.
2
Religion is belief without evidence. That applies to you three far more than it applies to any scientist you criticise. You are the high priests.
2
Same goes for Trump, is that alright?
1
So long as it's done with evidence and not lies.
1
@jimothygreen8879 Same goes for journalists. Problem is, Fauci couldn't do his job without repeated highlighting the fact that Trump was a nuffy, and the trumpanzees really hated that. If Cv19 had hit this year, and Fauci was doing the same thing to Biden, he'd be their hero. Most of them don't have the intelligence to comprehend much of what he says anyway.
1
@fred4687 Fauci changed his advice when the situation changed. What's wrong with that? It's called science. New evidence leads to new conclusions. The only reason it became political was the fact that much of what Fauci said made Trump look like a fool. That says a lot more about Trump then it does Fauci.
1
Divine Truth1 Have you ever heard of the flat earth society? They have some ideas which you might be interested in, and I'm sure you'll more than meet their maximum intelligence requirements.
1
@fred4687 Rubbish. You're the one bringing politics into it. The situation changes, so his advice changed. It had nothing to do with politics. Just because Trump said a lot of stupid things doesn't mean Fauci is being political for disagreeing with him. And as for your TDS comment, projection much? If you believe everything Trump says without question and denigrate people like Fauci simply for questioning him, the your the deranged one.
1
@fred4687 What ever you say troll. 2 years ago, you'd never heard of the man. Now you're just repeating what cult leader Trump says about him. Stop drinking the koolaid and learn to think for yourself.
1
Divine Truth1 The vaccine is FDA approved, so your video is wrong. When you grow up you'll realise that not everything you see on YT is true, especially if it comes from anti vaxxer nutters.
1
@fred4687 "TDS... Blah blah blah..." Ahhh, so it's cult leader Trump who is above criticism. Thanx for proving my point troll.
1
Divine Truth1 Your link says they have emergency approval. What's your point? Do you even think you have one?
1
@fred4687 That's because the only thing you have against Fauci is that he disagree with Trump so often. You say Fauci had been playing politics for decades, then claim nobody knew who he was 2 years ago. How could he possibly be playing politics if nobody knew who he was?
1
@fred4687 Name one thing Fauci did over 10 years ago which was politically motivated.
1
Oh look, a self proclaimed "fact checker", without any facts. What a troll.
1
@user-yh7fc7wt6v Nope, it should always be open season on trolls who talk garbage,
1
@darrylrowe8193 Which emails? What is it you think they said?
1
@darrylrowe8193 You didn't answer the question. What was in the emails that you think is so incriminating. And if Sharri Markson is your source, then I'm sure Fauci doesn't have too much to worry about. That lip gloss journalist wouldn't get a job at any reputable media outlet
1
@darrylrowe8193 Fauci never claimed the virus came from the wet markets. He only spoke of probabilities based on the available evidence. You must be talking about the email he received from Kristian Andersen on 31 Jan 2020, in which he said "The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all of the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered." But also said "There are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.".. I bet you didn't know the same person sent Fauci a follow-up email on 17 March 2020 which stated "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." Who ever told you that "There were a series of emails some confirming he new other wise but deliberately lied" seems to have lied to you in a pathetic attempt to discredit Fauci. Of course, now that you know you've been lied to, you'll stop repeating that lie, and correct others when they do so, right? You wouldn't want to look like a hypocrite.
1
@darrylrowe8193 No, he never said that. According to his emails, he was told "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus" on 17 March 2020. If you think his emails say something different, you're going to have to quote them. He's been quite open about the research. I knew about it in Feb last year. You just love spreading lies, don't you troll.
1
@darrylrowe8193 The real facts have been removed. Fauci's comments were based on the available evidence, his emails show this. I'd be more concerned with your own "facts" if I were you.
1
@darrylrowe8193 None of that happened. You shouldn't believe everything the extreme right/Trump supporting media tells you to, they lie as often as he does.
1
@darrylrowe8193 You said he emails made him guilty. I showed you they didn't. Now you're shifting the goal posts and making more BS claims. Time for you to prove your case with evidence, or rack off.
1
@darrylrowe8193 His emails have already proven you wrong, which is why you don't want to talk about them anymore. 🤔
1
@darrylrowe8193 Do you also think Trump really won the election?
1
@darrylrowe8193 More conspiracy theory nonsense. Trump lost because he let Cv19 get out of control. It had nothing to do with the imaginary deep state.
1
@darrylrowe8193 What a load of garbage, For a start, nobody is suggesting we reduce CO to below 250ppm. CO2 hasn't been at 1200ppm for millions of years, plants have grown fine in that time. Where do you get this utter nonsense? And why won't you address your original point? You claimed Fauci's emails were the smoking gun. You're still yet to support that with a single quote. Stop shifting the goal posts and just admit you were wrong.
1
@darrylrowe8193 No you hypocrite, the question was, what was in Fauci's emails which you think makes him guilty?
1
@darrylrowe8193 So no examples of Fauci's emails? On ya bike troll.
1
@darrylrowe8193 You still having present a single one of his emails. It's almost as if you have NFI was his emails actually say.
1
@darrylrowe8193 What ever you day troll.
1
@darrylrowe8193 Your projection is astounding, troll.
1
Why? Appart from the fact he disagreed with Trump, of course.
1
@galicjuszpostrzyzynski4041 Often paired with caps that say MAGA. What a surprise. I'm not sure highlighting the fact Trump has NFI is grounds for arrest.
1
Says someone who has obviously never actually done any. Remember the unsubstantiated opinions of trolls like you are based on LIES, not facts.
1
@isaL Grow up child.
1
@dumbestguyintheroom6651 How would you have any idea what goes on in the scientific community? You're clearly not a part of it.
1
@isaL Time for you to grow up, child.
1
@isaL OK child.
1
@dumbestguyintheroom6651 I'm quietly confident.
1
@dumbestguyintheroom6651 I know there's an extremely high likelihood that none of them are still working today, what's your point?
1
@dumbestguyintheroom6651 I don't see the point in discussing something so irrelevant.
1
@dumbestguyintheroom6651 Oh, I see what you did there troll. Obviously, I was saying that what happened in 1970 is irrelevant, and you just agreed, by refusing to address it. Game over, loser.
1
@dumbestguyintheroom6651 As I have already said, that wasn't the question I was answering, troll. If your comprehension skills were half as good as mine, I would need to point this out to you.
1
@diannemorris8690 Science is based on empirical evidence, religion - and I'm not just talking spiritualism here - is based on belief without evidence. They're polar opposites; religious beliefs are the antithesis of science, spiritual or otherwise.
1
So you're saying anything that was illegal in NG should be legal today? Rational thought doesn't seem to be you're thing.
1