Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "Queensland's latest COVID case hosted a house party" video.

  1. It's almost like you don't understand the issue at all.
    3
  2.  Seeker Truth  If you think "pandemic" is a measure of how many people die, then you don't even know what the word means.
    2
  3.  @rightsmatter2220  How can the survival rate be that high, when over 2% of the 127 million people who have tested positive have died? Do you understand basic math? Go one, prove how completely illogical you are by claiming this is due to false positive test, which of course, is just another lie, and would reduce the survival rate, not increase it.
    1
  4.  Seeker Truth  Almost 2.8 million dead globally now. 8-9,000 people dying daily. Maybe you should stop cherry picking.
    1
  5.  Seeker Truth  The last pandemic that was anywhere close to this one was probably the Spanish flu, which was over 100 years ago. The advancements over the last 100 years in both the medical field as was as communication of information make any comparison between the 2 futile. As for ivermectin: "EMA has reviewed the latest evidence on the use of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and concluded that the available data do not support its use for COVID-19 outside well-designed clinical trials. In the EU, ivermectin tablets are approved for treating some parasitic worm infestations while ivermectin skin preparations are approved for treating skin conditions such as rosacea. Ivermectin is also authorised for veterinary use for a wide range of animal species for internal and external parasites. Ivermectin medicines are not authorised for use in COVID-19 in the EU, and EMA has not received any application for such use.1 Following recent media reports and publications on the use of ivermectin, EMA reviewed the latest published evidence from laboratory studies, observational studies, clinical trials and meta-analyses. Laboratory studies found that ivermectin could block replication of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19), but at much higher ivermectin concentrations than those achieved with the currently authorised doses. Results from clinical studies were varied, with some studies showing no benefit and others reporting a potential benefit. Most studies EMA reviewed were small and had additional limitations, including different dosing regimens and use of concomitant medications. EMA therefore concluded that the currently available evidence is not sufficient to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 outside clinical trials. Although ivermectin is generally well tolerated at doses authorised for other indications, side effects could increase with the much higher doses that would be needed to obtain concentrations of ivermectin in the lungs that are effective against the virus. Toxicity when ivermectin is used at higher than approved doses therefore cannot be excluded." That's why.
    1
  6.  @rogerstone4283  Yes yes yes, we know... The number were manufactured by the lizard people, and the earth is flat to. That's not what the word "pandemic" means. It has nothing to do with deaths. The word "pandemic" refers to the spread of the disease, not the fatality.
    1
  7.  Seeker Truth  Feel free to fund such a study yourself. The one's so far have indicated that it's of no benefit, that should be enough to answer your question, were you not pushing a narrative of your own.
    1
  8.  Seeker Truth  What ever you say troll.
    1
  9.  Seeker Truth  You're the pot calling the kettle black. You're the liar. You're the troll. And you're the hypocrite. Hope this helps you find truth.
    1