Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "COVID booster recommended after five months" video.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oldenshort1346 I certainly levitate above those who ignore or dispute the existence of the points I raise because they can't refute them, and those who think argumentum ad verecundiam makes for a valid argument, especially after they childishly and hypocritically accuse others of having "an Infantile brain".
Waffle on as much as you like, the fact still remains; I've refuted the cornerstone of your argument, and you've completely ignored mine. How you see that as a win for you, I'll never know.
BTW, I'm not disputing the findings of any peer reviewed paper. I'm disputing the illogical conclusions your Dr Charlatan is drawing from those findings. Yes, the vaccine does little to reduce household transmission, I've already agreed with that. But you can't use that to show it does little to reduce transmissions in general, which have vastly different mechanism. That's not logical. If I'm only contagious for 2 days, rather an 7, then I'm still going to give it to my wife, who I share a bed with every day, but I'm not going to give it to people I come in contact with on day 3, when I'm no longer contagious. Your failure to grasp, let alone address, this insanely simple concept leads me to suspect you're being deliberately ignorant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oldenshort1346 You continue to ignore the fact that you cannot measure community transmission using only household data. The video you use as evidence even goes into detail about how these 2 methods of transmission are different. So obviously, it makes zero sense to use one to measure the other. I've tried to discuss this point with you, but you persist in avoiding it, resorting instead to childish personal attacks on every occasion. And you have the gall to call me a child? Really, that's just projection.
The fact remains, a shorter contagious period with mean lower community transmission, but not necessarily lower household transmission, so your Dr Charlatan has deliberately chosen a dataset which is incapable of detecting the change he's claims to be measuring, then claiming there is no change, all the while ignoring other datasets which do indeed highlight that change.
At 12:06 he says "Vaccine ineffectiveness" when the card he's reading from says "Vaccine effectiveness". This is an old trick charlatans use to brainwash people. Notice how quickly he says it, classic brainwashing technique there.
At 18:20 He claim, correctly, that natural immunity lasts longer. But he fails to mention the excessive cost. 1 in 50 people dies. about 1 in 8 require hospitalisation.
At 20:49 He references the UK weekly surveillance report, but fails to mention the report claims the vaccine has prevented 261,500 hospitalisation. Not even attempting to paint a balanced picture here.
At 23:33 He says he argues for "More data more data more data", this after using household transmission data, which is a much smaller dataset than community transmission data. He could have used community transmission data, but that wouldn't have give the results he was after.
The really telling thing is in the video description: "Access to all of Chris’s content, live webinars twice a month, and much much more is available to our paying members". Need I say more?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1