Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "Documents reveal China discussed weaponisation of coronaviruses prior to pandemic" video.

  1. What the Murdoch media won't tell you is the US have been doing the same thing for decades.
    7
  2. What the Murdoch media won't tell you is the US have been doing the same thing for decades.
    3
  3.  @CharlesLumia  With a stunning retort like that, I bet you're the captain of the debating team back home in Hog Snout, Alabama.
    2
  4.  @infiniLor  A virus that spread so fast has a risk of infecting anyone, even though who "dropped" it. If China wanted to sterilise it's people, it would just use an existing vaccine and make it mandatory. There's no need for a killer virus. I don't think you're thought this through very far, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you've done your best.
    2
  5.  @fukuyamahironobu  The real weapon is the misinformation spread by anti-vaxxers.
    2
  6.  @infiniLor  A personal attack by any other name... I don't believe my assessment is the only way it could be, I just don't believe your assessment holds any water. Given the motives you claim the Chinese have, the actions you suggest they've taken would be counter-productive. When I point that out to you, you stop discussing the point and move straight on to personal attacks. You can't even support your own position. It's quite pathetic really. And most unbelievably,, you actually think there's some merit in the garbage you're posting. Aside form the fact it's littered with unfounded assumptions, it's completely illogical. You don't take over the world by weakening your own country. If China's plan was to global domination, they'd have released it everywhere else. Go on, counter that with the same pointless straw man you did last time. I can't wait.
    2
  7.  @nissan300zxtt9  What a sad world you must live in. Over here in reality, we don't have any of that happening. You should try reality some time, you might like it.
    2
  8. What the Murdoch media won't tell you is the US have been doing the same thing for decades.
    1
  9. What the Murdoch media won't tell you is the US have been doing the same thing for decades.
    1
  10.  @s.a.2317  I'm not saying they are. I'm saying that both countries (as well as a host of others) have discussed it. If China did it, do you really think they'd release it in their own country?
    1
  11.  @joshfrank1680  If they were trying to achieve that, don't you think they'd use a much more targeted solution?
    1
  12.  @joshfrank1680  That's the point, you don't implement successful population control by targeting the elderly. That doesn't stop people reproducing. And if population control was their goal, why hasn't it had any noticeable impact on their population? Why did they bring it under control so quickly? None of that stacks up.
    1
  13.  @queenbunnyfoofoo6112  And put themselves at potential risk? Why would they do that?
    1
  14. @Nordic Warrior Child.
    1
  15.  @notmypotato3730  And maybe it wasn't. Do you really think they'd put themselves at risk? Why not test it in the US?
    1
  16.  @CharlesLumia  I agree, your response was utter nonsense. If you disagree with what I'm saying then point out why. Feel free to ask a grown up to help you with that.
    1
  17.  @infiniLor  Once again you fail to think things through. The path to global domination is not through weakening your own. If that was their plan, they almost certainly would have released it in the US. "Let's take over the world by poisoning our own people"... And you wonder why I called your intelligence into question?
    1
  18.  @infiniLor  Yes, but no the irrational angle you're postulating. Is it possible for you to admit your idea is ridiculous? I'm not claiming they care for their own people, so you can stop repeating that straw man. But that doesn't mean poisoning them is a logical first step towards global domination. China had to go into major lockdown when Cv19 hit to prevent it spreading across the entire country, and it had a similar economic impact there as it did everywhere else. How the hell does that put them in the box seat for taking over the world? If you want me to see things from your angle, stop posting irrational nonsense.
    1
  19.  @infiniLor  I ask for rational thought, and the best you can do is childish insults. Looks like my original assessment was fairly accurate.
    1
  20.  @infiniLor  I never said that at all. I said that they wouldn't put themselves at risk, and I said that attacking their own economy is not the path to global domination. There is no logical link what so ever between deliberately releasing a virus in their own country, and an attempt to take over the world.
    1
  21.  @infiniLor  And you can't really call it a rebuttal, when you haven't even presented a case.
    1
  22.  Mia Rob  Do you know what the US does to it's own people? Do you know what the UK does to it's own people? Do you know what Australia does to it's own people? Wake up. Sheeple
    1
  23.  @patricks.gallant1827  You say that as if "Act of God/Pandemic" clauses aren't a part of every trade deal. The gates foundation has been active in working to prevent pandemics for years. The correlations you're pointing out are meaningless.
    1
  24.  @patricks.gallant1827  Intelligent people realised that correlation does not equate to causality, while those at the other end of the scale assume it does.
    1
  25.  @patricks.gallant1827  Going by that logic, if the government was planning a defence against an asteroid ELE, and then one occurred, would you conclude the government caused it?
    1
  26.  @patricks.gallant1827  I think you just shifted the goal posts and resorted to personal attacks.
    1