Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "Victorian government using 'ridiculous and inflammatory language' to 'terrify' people" video.

If it wasn't for the restrictions put in place, most of us would know someone personally who has died from Cv19, and several people still suffering it's long term effects.
3
He can't, he has no solution to offer. If there were an election in Vic tomorrow, he's probably abstain. If he won, then he'd have to fix the problem, and he has no idea who to.
3
@tatyanaromanov2372 3.7 million people didn't get a scratch throat, they died. a further 15 million people didn't get a scratch throat, they're still suffering the debilitating long term effects of Cv19. But you got over it in 2 days, so we should just ignore the millions who didn't, right?
3
@Christoff070 Cv19 does not have a 99% recovery rate you liar. The mortality rate is greater than 2%. Cv19 had killed 10 times the number of people the flu would in a year despite everything we've done to stop it. You're talking absolute garbage.
2
@Christoff070 Flu deaths were not 1,000,000 per year, that's just another lie. Stop killing people with your lies. Cv19 is not the flu. Flu deaths are not being trotted as Cv19 deaths, there is no evidence to support this at all.
2
@sasswaresass4804 Sadly, people like you spread lies like that. Stop killing people with your lies.
2
@Christoff070 What a hypocrite.
2
@IndigoD Take another blue pill troll.
2
@Christoff070 Your natural cure have never been shown to be of use in treating Cv19. You're taking garbage again.
1
@IndigoD That you believe the PCR test has a high false positive rate is laughable. Victoria tested millions late last year without recording a single false positive. With a false positive rate of 0.1%, the odds of that are less than the odds of winning the lottery every week for 3 years.
1
Cv19 deaths in the last month: Texas: 1227 Victoria: 0 Something very wrong is happening in Texas.
1
@Christoff070 Flu deaths are down because of lockdown restrictions. Flu kills an avg of about 300k people in a year, without lockdown. CV19 kills 3 million people with a lockdown. Cv19 is much more serious than the flu.
1
Not once have I ever seen Tim Smith offer anything which even remotely resembles a viable solution.
1
@IndigoD What ever you say troll.
1
@micphoenix8200 yeah, I had no idea how illogical people could be until I read some of the garbage anti vaxxers post here. They're worse than flat earthers.
1
Ting All anti-vaxxer claims are likely to be fake news.
1
@sammifruitbat LOL. Lot's of luck with that. It only applied to experimental drugs, not drugs approved for general use. The vaccine has been approved, so it's not classified as experimental.
1
If you believe everything you see on this channel, they're probably right to think that.
1
@leejenkins7184 No, they didn't all have pre-existing conditions. Most of those comorbidities were things like pneumonia and chronic respiratory illness, which were brought on by the Cv19 infection. Pneumonia was the most common comorbidity. Most of the pre-existing comorbidities were things like asthma, diabetes, and obesity, not immediately life threatening. You should go read the actual CDC report you're misrepresenting here, it's all in there. And no, drug overdoses were not recorded as Cv19 deaths. Stop killing people with your lies.
1
@tanoz1440 What are you babbling on about?
1
@Loribyn Why do you waste your time spreading such lies? Stop killing people with your lies.
1
@Changeworld408 OK child.
1
@thefenskes5020 Well, this for starters. "most people don't have any symptoms". That's garbage. The best estimates for the asymptomatic rate are 15% - 30%. That's not "most people", not even close. Feel free to provide a reference from the relevant government agencies which 100% supports his claim, but you wont find any. His comments on the CDC are a lie. The interaction between the virus and the host is country independent. So yes, what the CDC finds is relevant to Australia, just as it is the rest of the world. "and it kills less than 0.03% of the people who do contract it and are confirmed to have done so by same" Another lie. The mortality rate for Cv19 is above 2%. Feel free to provide a reference from the relevant government agencies which 100% supports his claim of 0.03%. Then there's his implication that the lockdowns in Vic are unnecessary, supported by statistics which any sane person not trying to distort the truth would interpret as "The lockdowns are doing what they're intended to do, preventing the virus from spreading". Sinnergism is actually suggesting the fact the lockdowns are so successful means they never should have been implemented in the first place. Utterly ridiculous. He's also using the result of the action rather than the alternative. Quite deceptive. There's no point in discussing the number of cases/hospitalisation/deaths that occur once lockdowns are implemented when you're attempting to show they shouldn't have been implemented in the first place. No, what you need there is the number of cases/hospitalisation/deaths which would have occurred if lockdowns weren't implemented at all, or if they were implemented to late or not stringently enough. There are many examples around the world where lockdowns weren't as adequately implemented as they have been here, and none of them suggest they're doing better than we are. In almost all cases, far from it.
1
@thefenskes5020 I was talking about how the virus effects people once they're infected, not how it spreads.
1
@thefenskes5020 That will tell you the hospitalisation rate, not the asymptomatic rate. I couldn't help but notice the total absence of links in your post. Where's all the evidence you claimed to have?
1