Comments by "" (@thehumanity0) on "'Democrat' Tulsi Gabbard Gets Fox News Promotion, As Predicted" video.

A lot of people were honestly correct. Ana Kasparian was nowhere near the first one to point it out, but she arguably got targeted the most by Gabbard and her supporters for her mostly objective criticisms of her. She did the same type of story on Andrew Yang as well and was basically coined as a Bernie Bro hater, but her actual facts and criticisms were objective and held up from what I remember, she was basically attacked over feelings and her antagonistic position and history with certain groups. However, Yang is now pushing a neoliberal party being lead by Bush and Trump administration goons, while Gabbard is about to become a Fox News Host and has already been their mouthpiece for over a year, so whether she had personal intentions or not, she was just objectively correct in her analysis of them.
25
@TheCybertiger9 What did she do? Blast someone she saw as untrustworthy and objectively criticized for things like Gabbard's past support for torture? It's hard to argue with the results, you just sound like you're holding onto a past outdated grudge.
8
The only time I ever liked Tulsi was when I knew very little about her history and politics. Once you learned that she used to support torture and had some other pretty egregious right-wing views, it was pretty easy to not trust the words coming out of her mouth as completely genuine.
6
@brandonbrown2621 Perhaps she was, but it's still unwise to give Clinton credit about anything she was only ever being self-serving towards.
3
@TheCybertiger9 Wow I don't know if I've ever seen your absurd level of copium before. It's honestly impressive.
2
I think the most aggravating thing about Tulsi Gabbard has always been her cult following of leftists that always go to bat for her no matter what she says or does - that group has arguably dwindled to almost nothing as of today, but it's still a reminder that many leftists are easily duped, split up into teams, and mislead by people are complete charlatans. This is why I've always disliked Jimmy Dore, because he has the same level of convictions for leftist politics as someone like Tulsi Gabbard - if switching to the other side is a better offer, they'll fucking do it within a year.
2
And it's entirely because Gabbard is just pandering to them in a humiliatingly obvious way. Strange how they can only ever agree with a "Democrat" when she's putting everything she possesses into kissing their asses.
1
If we're playing that game, Donald Trump was right about Michael Bloomberg, but everyone knows he only did so because he has personal beef with Bloomberg, Clinton is no different, they're both fucking cancer.
1
@brandonbrown2621 If everyone started giving Hillary Clinton credit for shit she doesn't deserve credit for, then that's just kindling for a potential comeback for her in the future, the same way the media tries to resurrect George W. Bush or how libs now worship Liz Cheney as some moral pillar in the Republican Party. I said it's unwise for anyone to do so whether it's the media or a collective group on social media. Clearly a single individual isn't going to have that effect all on their own and I'm not sure why I even need to explain that.
1
@tooelenative9098 "she has true wisdom, integrity and common sense" - Yes I'm sure she will embody all those traits as a Fox News host & Roger Ailes mouthpiece. I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic or you've been living under a rock for 2 years. Gabbard has become more Dave Rubin than Rubin himself. I mean, you gotta be some right-wing goon if you seriously believe any of that shit unironically. She's the dictionary definition of a grifter Hack.
1