Comments by "Aleksa Žunjić" (@aleksazunjic9672) on "How effective were Indian troops in WW2? TIKhistory" video.

Nope. IQ is affected by race . Without intelligence you cannot get good education. Without education you cannot properly operate complex equipment. Race also affects bodily constitution. This in turn affects physical fitness - another important aspect in military affairs.
4
@darkodonnie2729 As I said, they were no longer martial in 20th century, due to biological mixing that happened trough centuries.
3
@peterc.1419 India had low quality population. Malnourished, illiterate peasants and corrupt "elite" - many of them being Muslim and ruling Hindu population. It was divided before British arrived, they just used that fact in their own advantage.
2
@TheImperatorKnight British efforts also do not count then, as slavery persisted in US , Brazil etc ... It persist to this day in Muslim countries.
2
@vorynrosethorn903 Nope :D Confederates were "pressured" by US Army, British were neutral (and slightly South leaning) in that war. As for Brazil, it was mostly ridicule of whole civilized rule. Brazilians did not give two hoots about hypocritical British, but were embarrassed by French . As for slave trade in Middle East (Sudan etc...) it was never completely broken to this day.
2
@markaxworthy2508 Slave trade did not collapse because of British action. US and Brazil already had large self-sustaining Black population and they did not require further imports.
2
@markaxworthy2508 No, it did not. Trade was essentially stopped by saturation of markets. Those countries that kept slavery after British decided to abandon it, already had large Black population. Slavery as a system became inefficient in time of industrialization.
2
@markaxworthy2508 US Congress already in 1807 banned import of new slaves. There was no great opposition from slave states because they already had large self-sustaining Black population. Earlier efforts to ban import of slaves started in 1794. All of this had nothing to do with the British.
2
Problem was they were no longer "martial" in 20th century.
1
@darkodonnie2729 What about his mother ? ;) And his father's mother and mother's mother ? Blood gets diluted unless you follow strict caste rules.
1
Everyone with two ounces of brain understands that humans are not equal, and that races (sub -species) exist.
1
@alganhar1 We all know that population makes the decisions, not the government and the elite :D :D In a real world slavery become economically unfeasible . Big capital understood that workers would make them more profit if they get some wage and think they are "free" and "have democracy" . Note that slave labor is actually not free for the owner. He has to feed them, cloth them, make them shelter, heal them when they are sick etc ... Supposedly free White people working in Northern factories sometimes (often) had worse standard of living than Black slaves in the South. In any case, slave trade did not stop due to British "blockade" because they could not enforce it. It stopped because slave countries like US and Brazil already had huge Black population and they did not need more imports.
1
@markaxworthy2508 Well, actually they were not. There were millions of slaves in US at the time of Civil War . They were all descendants of slaves, not recently captured and sold persons. In fact, slave could not be legally registered as a slave if he was not born as a slave. Occasionally, criminal enterprises would attempt to smuggle illegal slaves at lower prices, but this was a high risk both for them and for perspective buyer.
1