Comments by "" (@IHMadeThis) on "Fighting for gun control in America" video.

  1. You know that those are not Thomas Jefferson's words, right? That quote is from a publication in a 1989 pro-Second Amendment newspaper column by Charlie Reese, and it is certainly not found among Jefferson’s recorded writings, letters, or speeches
    7
  2. Goodness. You people are obtuse AF. lol
    3
  3.  @Alfarojv  See how you have to exaggerate in order to try to mock me? That should tell you something. You're an embarrassment to our species.
    3
  4. 1...The liberals are trying to take your guns!!! 2....They want to take your guns and they are gonna move criminals into your area and they are gonna get you!!! 3....Buy more guns!
    2
  5.  @k333rl  Millions of people are not saved by guns every year. Federal Bureau of Investigation found that defensive gun uses occur an average of 67,740 times per year.
    2
  6.  @k333rl  You are quoting stats from a 1992 study done by Gary Kleck and Marc Getz, criminologists at Florida State University and not the CDC. Gun nuts will latch on to anything that seems to support their narrative. At least try smh.
    2
  7. You sound like a coward. A delusional one at that. I hope you're on a watch list.
    2
  8.  @Silverlined_69  Oh...what is that narritive?
    1
  9. I'm sure you asinine statistic will help the spirits or all the people in wheel chairs, hobbled, and disfigured because of fire arms. smh
    1
  10.  @k333rl  At the very least, saying millions of people are saved by guns is extremely misleading. I've noticed that you are liking your own comments so I have no further interest in debating with you. Feel free to pretend that you won the debate.
    1
  11.  @keithtolman6904  lol You sound like a complete fool.
    1
  12.  @ctgslayer  The phrase "saved by guns" is loaded, generic, and hollow. Saved from what?
    1
  13. Why don't you complain about the dislikes on individual comments? They have never been enabled. You're posts are embarrassingly obtuse and wilfully ignorant. I see why you don't respond when corrected.
    1
  14.  @Alfarojv  Oh...sick burn! lol You're clown shoes, bub.
    1
  15.  @Silverlined_69  Ok...why can't we hear abou gang violence? Explain what you meant by that...
    1
  16. No laws.
    1
  17.  @1911GreaterThanALL  Dude posted "ban murder." Obviously to mock banning guns. Don't be obtuse.
    1
  18.  @1911GreaterThanALL  I have zero idea what you are trying to say. Work on your sentence structure and being concise then get back to me.
    1
  19.  @1911GreaterThanALL  So..."making murder illegal is ineffective at keeping people from murdering so why make murder illegal?" this same "logic" can be applied to every law. Can you explain to me how you are not arguing that we should have no laws?
    1
  20. The 2nd Amendment was intended to protect slave owners from potential slave uprisings. Patrick Henry and George Mason didn't think a federal milita would respond fast enough, or at all, to a slave revolt so they wanted "well-regulated militias for the security of free states..." It's crazy how many gun worshippers ignore this.
    1
  21.  @bryans.9575  See...you could just Google or youtube "Second amendment and slavery" but instead you ask for a source from me...so you can just say something negative about the source. smh I'm not doing the leg work for you. If you have a desire to know, look it up.
    1
  22.  @Silverlined_69  Don't hide your hands now. I know what you are.
    1
  23.  @rec-reation9620  🤣🤣🤣 You think the crime rate is connected to how much money the police get!? 😂😂😂
    1
  24.  @rec-reation9620  More cops = less crime? Ok. I can't take you seriously any longer. You're dismissed, little guy. T
    1
  25.  @Silverlined_69  Thinly vailed racism always works it's way into gun debates, huh? Makes sense given that the origins of the second amendment are rooted in militas to stop slave revolts. smh
    1
  26.  @selms22  You sock puppets are so predictable. lol
    1