Comments by "Lou LFW" (@loulfw2513) on "Bernie Votes 'NO' On Biden Nominee" video.

  1.  @AdultThirdCultureKid1971  how about the fact that she is not qualified in any way for the postiion and has megahuge conflicts of interest?
    39
  2. Everyone does.
    34
  3. David is in charge of the titles of his videos. This was beyond misleading. Shame on him. No wonder his status as a commentator is going down. The majority of us were expecting exactly what you were.
    10
  4. THAT is what we are WAITING for. Not this. David misleading his audience does NOT look good on him.
    7
  5. Waiting to hear his vote on Neera Tanden, is where. Ready to shit on him if he does, is where. Preparing to double down on that epithet if he DOES sell out, is where. You're welcome.
    7
  6.  @wvu05  it ABSOLUTELY doesn't. Although in theory Biden could nominate someone worse, I can't imagine who that would be. The onty thing this should accomplish is dirivng all remaining progressives ourt of the Democratic Party. #DemExit
    5
  7.  @Arnez109  David is now clearly in the second tier of hosts based on his lukewarm criticism of Biden and the Dems. Mike too, though less so. Whereas Tim Black and Richard medhurst are on the rise. (I know it sounds like I am making book on sports teams based on their records this month...lol...)
    3
  8.  @Arnez109  I trust Kyle, Jimmy and Lee more than anyone. That doesn't mean they are 100% correct ior that I agree with every single position. But their record is the best. As for passion and anger, Convo COuch is second only to Jimmy for their abnger and the fact that they actually doon the street reporting. I am liking RIchard Medhurst more and more as well as Tim Black despite his bveef with Jimmy over Boogalogate. But I dio recommend these and a dozen others for your information sources.
    3
  9. Why, based on the last year?
    3
  10.  @chrisg.4796  unbelievably weaselly. He should have voted no AT the confirmation hearings and revealed more of her record, corporate donors and complete lack of qualifications.
    2
  11. Hiding their heads in shame discovering she is still at heart a Republican?
    2
  12. But he doesn't want to. He LIKES being a piece of shit Republican.
    2
  13.  @KrizMo122  EXACTLY!!!!!!
    2
  14.  @Miblive  the great Bernie of 2015 for sure. The Bernie of 2018 and 2019, OK. THe pod person weasel of the last year? NOt sure about him.
    2
  15. The fact that he hasn't said no given he had a week to reject one of the worst people imaginable is NOT a good sign.
    2
  16.  @KC-jr6zs  I have been far more often disappointed than pleased with Bernie since his Grand Caving last year. I have no reason for optimism and there is zero evidence this 3D chess analogy is getting us anything.
    2
  17.  @JudgeJulieLit  the .....WHAT?
    2
  18.  @wvu05  Zoe Baird? Kimba Wood?
    2
  19.  @wvu05  extremely misleading. David is to blame and maybe you are more forgiving when you are misled. Nobody was following Vilsack, and since he was confirmed, David is doing opilitical threatre. The left is supposed to be more substantive. The more I think about this issue and title, the more embarrassing it looks for him. Maybe he is distracted with fatherhood; I heard it does that to people.
    1
  20. Ummm...yes it very much does. It's too damn close. We need a few progressive Democrats to say no on Tanden NOW rather than later.
    1
  21. I wouldn't connect those two dots. But if he does vote for Tanden, he should have zero credibility with the left.
    1
  22.  @wvu05  doesn't there have to be? Doesn't the OMB HAVE to have a leader?
    1
  23.  @duane_313  that word is not in her dictionary
    1
  24. Everyone did. DaVid seems to be deliberately misleading his audience.
    1
  25. If he wasn't afraid he would have indicated a no vote a week ago.
    1
  26.  @balboa32  so it was a useless symbolic vote by Bernie that didn't mean anything. Such courage. Such class. Such bravery. Now le't's see him destroy Neera Tanden. He's had a fucking week.
    1
  27.  @wvu05  Supreme Court Justices?
    1
  28.  @tylerbrown9797  almost everyone did. Blame David Doel and his misleading title.
    1
  29.  @DarkKnightTrinity  well, that's your problem right there. YOU compare Biden to Trump. Smart insightful people raise the bar on that. Choosing one ofr the other will perpwetuate the system, allow Dmeocrats to move into neofacism, and give you EVEN WORSE candidates. Don't fall for it.
    1
  30.  @hurmur9528  meh
    1
  31.  @BrokenAbyss  I see you have posted to the wrong thread.
    1
  32.  @VAOdin  because he is still willing to cave to the Dems and the MCM? Not the qualities of a leader. If he does cave, he kills what little credibility he has left.
    1
  33.  @beachaddict7653  he could. We defeat them also. Of course, I hope AOC and the Squad are taking notes.
    1
  34.  @shanethomas6368  zero evidence to support that theory.
    1
  35.  @komoriaimi  not at all clear what cooment you are replying to thank you
    1
  36.  @wvu05  the news did not, I believe, say that at the time of the posting. Look, defend a misleading post all you wANT. Not a hill I will die on. But David's credibility has taken a huge hit in the last year and this helps him not a whit.
    1
  37.  @wvu05  Perhaps so. But David Doel misled his aurdience with this title, which he could have EASILY written more clearl. He has to own this and apologize to his followers. Or he will have fewer of them going forward.
    1
  38.  Ed Ram  no idea what this means.
    1
  39.  Ed Ram  you want ME to explain YOUR statement? Sorry, that's not how this works.
    1
  40.  Ed Ram  To recap: Ed claimed "If only Republican leaders would have the same moral fortitude. LMAO." As whom? NO idea. To what he is referring in the 78th comment on the thread? Not at all clear. Any attempt at clarification or edification? Zero. How useless ARE you if you can't even clarify your statement when ASKED?
    1
  41.  Ed Ram  Biden should withdraw the worst niminees and admit his mistakes. YOu managed to draw the 100% wrong conclusion.
    1
  42.  Ed Ram  the standards for progressives are remarkably consistent. I am amazed you don't see it.
    1
  43.  @shanethomas6368  previous comments deleted. To find what exactly? Maybe you have a link I can easily get to?
    1
  44.  @rossg9142  I understand both but if Bernie caves to Tanden I give up on him. And I think #peoplesparty or a third party is the best bet. IF we use our power wisely,. You know, kind of what Joe Manchin IS doing and what the #FraudSquad is not. I don't think Bernie know how to press an advantage any more. All I know is that I have never been a Democrat (for obvious reasons) but I understood why others might be. Until now.
    1
  45.  @Arnez109  let's face it. We all HOPED that was possible. Even me. I doubted it then but had hope. That hope is dashed. We now must FORCE him leftward by denying nominees (which should have started weeks ago).
    1
  46.  @Nackdad  bless you. I honestly never thought of that. But my phone plan does not include DC or Vermont.
    1
  47.  @RefurbishedPrototype  I could use someone like you to add your voice to my groups and page. You would be most welcome.
    1
  48.  @tomjackson8431  you too. I would welcome a man like you to my groups with open arms. You have echoed what I have bene saying an din so doing, make me feel less alone. Thank you for that even if you do nothing else.
    1
  49.  @AdultThirdCultureKid1971  you , too, are welcome to join my groups and pages.
    1
  50.  @dynamicworlds1  voting against terrible people and destroying their nomination is HARDLY a performative gesture. And if the Weasel In Chief nominates someone worse, we defeat at them as well. Lather, rinse, repeat. It's called having (and forgive me if you do not know this word) "principles". Or "values".
    1
  51.  @2tease886  couldn't have said it better myself. And based on his recent record, it does not look good.
    1
  52. Do you agree David Doel misled you?
    1
  53.  @lizzy-wx4rx  ROTFL good one. In other words, you ware willing to swallow any Blue No Matter Whom We Screw poison pill?
    1
  54.  The Nose Knows  ROTFL. "Bernie votes no on nominee"? Yeah, it fucking does. The vast majority of people reading that will assume it's Tanden. This is David's fault.
    1
  55. He appears to onluy be willing to appear to buck the sustem when the vote will mean nothing. Sadly, you are one of the few who seems to realzie this.
    1
  56. And yet refuses to mention 90% of her attacks and thefact that she is supremely unqualified.
    1
  57.  @Chrjstheshadow  you would never know that from the misleading title, though. WHICH WAS ENTIRELY THE PIONT.
    1
  58.  @chrisg.4796  I think the Bernie of 2015 or even 2019 would have. THis pod person or shell of a man I have major doubts about.
    1