Comments by "Sankalp" (@sankalp6872) on "Lok Sabha poll math day after ‘pran pratishtha’ u0026 the 200 seats that keep defying the BJP" video.
-
138
-
29
-
27
-
8
-
@indiamusically , I am very comfortable seeing the Ayodhya King sitting on his rightful throne. You talk about things being taken in a "good" spirit, but are they being taken in a "good" spirit? Mira road stone pelters belonged to which religion? Kashmiri pundits were massacred by which religion? Was it 500 years ago? Many from the Left are now singing the tune of the Supreme Court verdict, saying that there was NO TEMPLE DESTRUCTION. In reality, the court concluded the presence of a temple based on archaeological evidence and records of travelers (one of whom was a Jesuit priest who wrote about a Mosque built by destroying a Vishnu temple in Ayodhya by Babar in 1767). A temple that was conclusively there in the 12th century was not there by the 16th century. Now, I don't ask you to read between the events of the 12th century and 16th century but rather implore you to extrapolate the original logic (where they ask us to prove the destruction by Babar) and ask Muslims if they will give us back all the current Mosque lands that were conclusively built by razing temples? There are many with irrefutable evidence.
A Hindu Rashtra means nothing to me, but a Ramrajya to me in "practical terms" is RESPECT BEGETS RESPECT.
Lastly, you don't have to go so gaga over Hinduism. Not all is jolly about my religion. Intentionally or not, Hinduism did get corrupted. That is why we have the concept of 4 Yugas and a system of progressive corruption of "Dharma". In the current yug it is only standing on TRUTH.
However, my Hindu religion is open to debate, discussion, and incorporating new ideas and discarding old ones. Are Muslims willing to incorporate new ideas? Will they acknowledge bad ideas and reform their book? These questions are important because the answers to these questions will determine their place in a "Hindu Rashtra" (which still means nothing to me). You are entitled to DISAGREE. For me, the discussion is OVER.
4
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1