Comments by "Sankalp" (@sankalp6872) on "Setback for Uddhav in fight for legacy of dad Balasaheb Thackeray, the first Shiv Sainik" video.

@yoddha-thewarrior2640 His exact words were, "Eunuchs bow to Sonia". He also called NCP a "scoundrel". There is nothing to manipulate. The full-length unedited video is available in the public domain.
37
Uddhav capturing "sympathy" votes is a folly assumption. Our "political pundits" were similarly sure of a sympathy wave for Kamalnath in MP. Maharashtra voters are MLA-centric. Despite his insane popularity, Balasaheb captured power only once in his lifetime. Even during his time, the understanding was that the BJP would be the "Big Brother" for Lok Sabha. UBT faction or even the larger INDIA bloc won't be a threat to BJP's Lok Sabha "ashwamedh" in Maha.
18
@yoddha-thewarrior2640 First, you propagate wrong information. When I present facts, instead of countering them, you make me an "outsider". Uddhav's motivation for forming the MVA was his political survival. The BJP's motivation to support Shinde was for its political resurrection. A perfectly "fair play" by both. There is no point in a larger philosophical discussion over this. Elections are in May and August. We'll know the people's wishes. Also, elections are not finality. They happen every 5 years. The question is if one of the SS factions perishes.
11
@Aditya_0211 I am a Marathi, and I do not subscribe to your bigoted views. The fact that you do not know that Maha is not one "culture" or "language" is not even surprising. Mumbai has always been cosmopolitan. Pune has now become cosmopolitan. The hinterlands of Maha are distinct in their own ways. For, e.g., Konkan and Vidarbha are very different cultures. Also, there are several Marathi dialects.
10
Voters are voting for bridges, roads, railways, airports, and many other development initiatives of the BJP. Congress's main vote bank is 20% Ms who are still stuck in the 6th century and burqas.
7
@Aditya_0211 The hollowness of your arguments is appalling. NY, Berlin, London, and Paris are very old cities with a unique history and evolution. Bombay was a group of uninhabited islands that were initially shaped by Goans like Dr Bhau Daji Lad. Parsis and Gujratis turned it into a business center. Marathis made up the workforce. The influx of North Indians and Madrasis was a lot later. Hindi emerged as the dominant language, not out of policy but consensus (or rather lack of consensus on a working language). Today, Industries have shifted out of Mumbai. Yet, it houses the headquarters of all major Indian companies. These HQs involve high-paying jobs requiring the best of India's talents. You cannot put language restrictions on such jobs. Also, Mumbai houses Bollywood, whose working language of which is Hindi. In conclusion, the language/region debate about "protecting" identity should not turn into destroying other identities. There is enough space for everything to coexist and perpetuate. If you are so "reformist," then campaign to destroy things like caste discrimination and Muslim fundamentalism.
5