Comments by "Sankalp" (@sankalp6872) on "Congress' refusal to attend Ram Mandir inauguration, politics u0026 electoral arithmetic argument" video.

  1. Most days of the year, these people spend time mocking the Hindu faith and figures like the Shankaracharya. Now, they are using them to put forth "divinity". Of the 4, only two have confirmed non-participation, and only 1 from Puri has really voiced opposition. The Uttarakhand Shankaracharya is opposed to Cow slaughter and has put its nationwide ban as a pre-condition for his attendance. The other two are yet to issue statements.
    43
  2. Actually, it is mandatory, but it depends on what you consider a temple and the context. A temple has many parts to it. The main part is the pooja room (Garbhagriha). Only that needs to be complete for inauguration. In the case of the Ram temple, the Garbhagriha and other main parts are ready.
    4
  3.  @kakun63  Fully agree.
    3
  4. The decline of the invitation was fine, but mocking the Ram temple event is STUPIDITY/BLASPHEMY of the HIGHEST ORDER. It further paints the INC as an anti-Hindu party. The needless commentary of the LEFT doesn't help them either. BJP sacrificed its blood for the Ram temple. It is the only party whose manifesto promised the Ram temple. Nobody can deny them the Ram Temple legacy. Congress is waiting for Modi to retire to make an electoral comeback, but with gimmicks like this, INC's "vanvas" may stretch beyond Modi had his next 3 BJP successors.
    1