Comments by "w71 w72" (@gives_bad_advice) on "Apollo 17 - The Last Men on the Moon | Part 1 | Free Documentary History" video.

  1. What's the big deal about "lag"? It's the speed limit of the universe--the speed of light. It takes at least 1.3 seconds for information of any kind to travel from the moon to Earth.
    8
  2. With that stuff you could make a hat for yourself.
    7
  3. ​ @rockethead7  Flaters despise "fish-eye lenses" almost as much as "shills" but not as much as "sheeple."
    5
  4. Sound travels through more than just air. Vibrations travel through tools and bones, too.
    5
  5. They stored the oxygen in pressurized tanks. Much of it was stored cryogenically, as a liquid, which takes up less volume than even a pressurized gas.
    5
  6. Sound travels through gasses in the capsule and inside pressuresuits and through solid objects, like tools.
    5
  7. That's where you live.
    5
  8. I've seen it. It's trash.
    5
  9. What about the other 21 men who went to the moon?
    4
  10. nobody can be this dumb. at least no one able to operate You Tube. jack here is a troll from a troll farm
    4
  11. Not nearly as dumb as you really are.
    4
  12. Well hundreds of people witnessed the launch of each Saturn V, so i would say it's you.
    4
  13. Why do your legs cast shadows at different angles?
    4
  14. Yes you are
    3
  15. No insect
    3
  16.  @crixxxxxxxxx  I suppose that pluralizing "times" allows for more than a single year. Although, for that matter, how meant U.S. soldiers were killed in 1972? How many Vietnamese?
    3
  17. ​​ @Giantdwarf00 And not a skillful troll at that. What kind of a troll invites his audience to quantify his level of dumb?
    3
  18. Do you have an article title for that? I can't find it.
    3
  19.  @malc796  Good. I've never been one to follow the herd.
    3
  20.  @LarryShaffer-e5p  "I would like to see someone burn a fuel in a vaccum of space." And then you can learn to spell vacuum
    3
  21. ​ @huseyinakkus4555  "How do shadows appear on the moon?" When an object blocks rays of light it creates a dark area.
    3
  22. Why do Putin and Xi accept the Apollo as true?
    3
  23. If everyone knows it, then it should be easy for you to tell me about some aerospace engineers who agree with you.
    3
  24.  @cameronbartlett6593  Scuba diving is usually carried out underwater where singing is inconvenient.
    3
  25. There were three. And bringing them back was a luxury they could not afford.
    2
  26. The camera was attached to the outside of the spacecraft.
    2
  27. Your thinking has not advanced from age of 9.
    2
  28.  @prasadsahu3044  "How is it possible without computers (1969)" There was very sophisticated intelligence controlling the space craft—called the human brain. Besides, there were indeed computers in the 60s/70s
    2
  29. That's Earth, Sherlock.
    2
  30.  @fiat2496  " @rockethead7 Why hasn't NASA accomplished anything in the past 50 years since the alleged moon missions?? Have you ever had a critical thought? Not trying to be mean, but some people are unable to think for themselves. I wonder if you might be one of those people? If you are, it's okay. It doesn't make you a bad guy. It just makes you a guy who is easily tricked." Simply pointing at things and saying they're fake is easy to do and doesn't make you a critical thinker. You don't know enough about the aerospace industry to critique it. You say NASA haven't accomplished anything in 50 years. That is absurd. NASA and the ESA soft-landed a robot on Titan, a moon of Saturn 5 million miles away, 10 years ago. You're saying that's not an accomplishment. NASA has put up two massive space telescopes and used them to discover, for example, that the rate of expansion of the universe is increasing and not decreasing as was previously thought. That's an accomplishment. There's no space agency on Earth that has accomplished more than NASA in the pastr 50 years.
    2
  31. Did you ever see a tall mountain behind a short mountain?
    2
  32.  @cepotkurawa6664  But you are smarter than all the physicists and engineers who believe it, right?
    2
  33. What would cause it to shred?
    2
  34. ​ @Tim22222 "that detail won't make a difference to science deniers crowd" Yeah but it makes a difference to me. The details are the best part.
    2
  35.  @jerryjones2818  Hardly uniquely American. The Ganges is a sewer. How much wilderness is remaining in western Europe? The Brazillians cannot cut rainforest fast enough.
    1
  36. Fuel cells
    1
  37. It is a 2.6 second delay. But only half the conversation will show the delay for an obvious reason that I'm sure you can figure out on your own. So if you don't hear a delay, it's because two engineers on earth are talking to each other. When there is a delay its because an astronaut is responding to someone on earth.
    1
  38. Maybe you are out of shape and easily winded.
    1
  39. Probably so. You certainly have top notch engineering programs.
    1
  40.  @Satialoves  You have no facts and no idea what you're talking about. It would make more sense for you to spend an hour on Wikipedia and then come back with something sensible.
    1
  41. The Burmese script is so cool and round.
    1
  42. In the ship that stayed in orbit around the moon. The lander that they took down to the surface was left at the moon.
    1
  43. There is air in the spacecraft where the microphone is located. Maybe you should think these things through before you start laughing at your own jokes.
    1
  44.  @rockethead7  No, i meant spacecraft. Was it not pressurized at liftoff?
    1
  45.  @rockethead7  Oh... I see... I assumed he was talking about the liftoff.
    1
  46. You need more emojis before anyone will take you seriously.
    1
  47.  @cameronbartlett6593  "same kind of suit" Really? Well, the astros didn't wear anything over their mouths as a scuba diver does. Also the astros' suits were under positive pressure, which would change things, i would expect. Also, the astros were breathing pure oxygen which is not possible at significant ocean depths for physiological reasons. And the astros not only used a rebreather but actually scrubbed the carbon dioxide they exhaled, so they could consume 100% of the oxygen they carried. I'm no scuba diver or space man, so if i have these details wrong, please let me know.
    1
  48. Periods were invented a long time ago.
    1
  49. Guess again, Sherlock.
    1
  50. Where was this video analysis published?
    1
  51. Is it possible to verify anything you've written?
    1
  52. What?
    1
  53. Depends how big your screen is. If you want it to be bigger just zoom in.
    1
  54.  @prasadsahu3044  NASA used mainframes during the Apollo missions. They ran caluculations on the ground which were send to the craft, which had its own onboard guidance computer. It's not clear what "wi-fi" has to do with anything as data were transferred from earth to the craft via radiowaves, which are of course, by definition, "wireless."
    1
  55. What would be the purpose of bringing it back?
    1
  56.  @aok4418  "I'm waiting michaelstillman" And what are you waiting for?
    1
  57.  @aok4418  Aerospace programs speak for themselves in the form of journal publications. I defy you to find a single peer reviewed article that dismisses Apollo as fraudulent.
    1
  58.  @aok4418  Let us know when you have an explanation for your belief, which incidentally, is contrary to what is known by every professional aerospace engineering program on Earth.
    1
  59. Well, 1968 was considered a pretty bad year by that who lived it, as i hear.
    1
  60.  @rockethead7  The U.S. has been quite generous with the fruits of Apollo.
    1
  61.  @crixxxxxxxxx  I don't doubt that. What I doubt is that all points in history show the same level of conflict.
    1
  62. True.
    1
  63. Has the U.S. ever given China moon rocks?
    1
  64. Are you counting the photos taken by mounted cameras on approach and descent to the surface?
    1
  65.  @rockethead7  This was a particularly comprehensive takedown. Btw, RH7, what is your background? Are you a formally trained aerospace engineer or the like?
    1
  66.  @rockethead7  I got a notification since i had replied to him previously. I gotta say, i believe what you say, and I'm astounded that a 7th grade drop out managed to develop such advanced linguistic and analytical abilities. I wish my students--college undergrads--could do the same in their essays. A few can but not many.
    1
  67.  @rockethead7  I want to believe in the noble savage. What's your field?
    1
  68.  @danielodom3839  "the post flight press conference". You think there was only one press conference. That's interesting. Nine trips to the moon and only one press conference. And you think they never took a telescope. You strike an awfully confident tone for someone with only a passing understanding of what he's talking about. They did take a telescope but i don't know why they bothered since a large earthbound telescope gave a more "magnificent" view of the stars than the telescope they took which had to be small enough to transport.
    1
  69. "while in the vacuum of space the sound waves should not propagate" Why wouldn't sound waves propagate through metal? Haven't you ever put your ear to a rail to hear a train coming?
    1
  70. ​ @daryllect6659  "What evidence?" For starters, five countries have photographed the Apollo landing sites, from lunar orbit, and found everything to be where expected. There's also hours of video showing dust being kicked around in a way consistent with a 1/6g vacuum environment. I'm willing to listen to evidence to the contrary, though.
    1
  71.  @armandoruiz8758  Words take on meaning from their usage, not just the other way around. And enough people prefer "American" over "United Statesian," to give the word its current meaning. I agree that it's inaccurate, which is why i usually go with "USAmerican," which admittedly has not caught on, yet. But I'll keep trying.
    1