General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Ayodeji Olowokere
AP Archive
comments

Comments by "Ayodeji Olowokere" (@ayodejiolowokere1076) on "FORMER RHODESIAN PM IAN SMITH" video.

@monkey7072 Rhodesia is dead. I'd say Zimbabwe has won.
2
Britain is doing fine.
2
You should avenge him. Try and retake Rhodesia.
1
@normalplayer7377 praising an advocate of segregation that provoked a war that killed thousands of people, conducted chemical warfare and put people in concentration camps. Answer your own questions. Besides, it's fun seeing what ridiculousness you come up with next.
1
@normalplayer7377 now come on Rhodieboo. Revive Rhodesia.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 Merry Christmas.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 out of the abundance of the heart does the mouth speak. May you reap all you've sown. As you've made this sacrilegious statement May the pain that you've spoken sprout in your life this year to come. This I declare and pronounce.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 as my word will stand they will be the witnesses.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 as you have dishonoured the spirit of this day. This calamity I speak into your life.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 You're pretty crazy to start with.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 from discussing the historical injustice of one country to wishing evil to another country. Why?
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 why did you wish there would be more oil spills?
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 you didn't answer the question. You thought to message me to regale me with a stupid anecdote.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 what kind of man child are you?
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 and once again for this year. All the pain of an oilspill into your life and it will remain there until I release you.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 you don't have the authority to return it to me.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 and before you think yourself the victim of wickedness, remember it is written there is power in the tongue and out of the fullness of the heart does the mouth speak. You spoke wickedness forth I took it and put it in your life. And it will stay in your life until I or one with greater authority than me releases you. Hahaha 'right back at you ' indeed. Wish it back again.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 hahahaha
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 here's the lifeline; seek God. Now I am blameless. The rest is up to you.
1
@incumbentvinyl9291 interesting remark.
1
@incumbentvinyl9291 okay.
1
@ropaul8006 which is why it longer exists?
1
@ropaul8006 so Zimbabwe doesn't exist?
1
@ropaul8006 it exists. That's more success than Rhodesia.
1
@ropaul8006 that's Rhodesia. That entity no longer exists.
1
@ropaul8006 I wasn't aware Rhodesia brought the cellphone to Africa.
1
@ropaul8006 and?
1
And destruction.
1
@joshispro345 isn't it better to have poverty and corruption than to be ruled by people who reduce you in your own country?
1
@joshispro345 and no. Most blacks lived in poverty in Rhodesia.
1
 @misaelfrancisbidon630 even if true, it's better than being ruled by aliens.
1
@incumbentvinyl9291 not being ruled by alien parasites.
1
He loved his property in Africa. He was no African.
1
@talk-supersix-seven6021 Africa belongs to who assimilates into the indigenous population.
1
@tightcamper are you from Africa?
1
@tightcamper and you're a colonial.
1
@benbenjamin2173 not if natives say he isn't.
1
@benbenjamin2173 if they form an apartheid state and never seek permission from the British and their government.
1
@Exodus if you're a North African, you have nothing to do with me. If you're a settler, you have nothing to do with me. Don't call me a fellow African we have nothing to do with one another. Back to Rhodesia. Rhodesia was segregated, there were reservations called Tribal Trust Lands which were the Rhodesian analogs of Bantustans. So it wasn't at all different from Apartheid to any significant degree.
1
@Exodus so as an African to a foreigner, take your own advice, and pick up a book about Rhodesia. You might actually learn something.
1
@Exodus why repeat yourself ignoring everything I communicated?
1
@---or2dk Bantu intermarried with Khoisan, alien.
1
@---or2dk and they were there first. Why are you doing this?
1
@---or2dk the mitochondrial DNA of Southern African Bantu is Khoisan.
1
@---or2dk Bantu have been in Southern Africa for over 2000 years. Do Africans in Britain have the same right to Britain as the English because the English weren't always there? Don't do this. This is Bantu land only.
1
@---or2dk do blacks in England have the same claim to England as the Germanic English? That was my question.
1
@---or2dk 2000 years of gradual migration. 2000 years of a more numerous farming population absorbing a much smaller hunter gatherer one. You're just making nonsense up. No one knows the circumstances of their arrival, you're just inventing history to weaken the Bantu claim to their own land.
1
@---or2dk so they don't have the same right?
1
@---or2dk oh please. A few acts by some individuals amounts to a historical pattern? They are aliens.
1
@---or2dk logically people who occupy a land first have the greater claim and right to it. Bantu have been in Southern Africa for over a thousand years.
1
@---or2dk and answer my question. Do blacks in England have the same claim to England as Germanic English?
1
@---or2dk do blacks in England have the same right and claim to it as the Germanic English? Yes or no?
1
@---or2dk stop making nonsense up. Khoisan are not confined to reserves. Furthermore, Bantu descend from Khoisan ancestors in Southern Africa.
1
@---or2dk then you're a hypocrite and shouldn't be taken seriously.
1
@---or2dk who decides the arbitrary timeframe? Some blacks have been there since the slave trade and most whites in Rhodesia were not born there. How do you decide enough time has gone by? Case in point.
1
@misaelfrancisbidon630 if the natives grant them status.
1
@jonasf1275 segregation isn't racist?
1
@jonasf1275 why not separate themselves in Europe?
1
@jonasf1275 If Europeans wanted to separate themselves from Africans, why did they go to Africa? They should have gone back to Europe.
1
@jonasf1275 segregation is wrong. You cannot tell people who to associate with. And you cannot force people to stay apart.
1
@jonasf1275 segregation is oppressive. It has never benefited anyone.
1
@incumbentvinyl9291 don't be stupid. No English would ever say immigrants have the same claim to England as they do. They only have those rights because the English gave it to them, and the English can withdraw them whenever they choose. And don't be so dishonest. I said right as in claim, not legal rights. You know this.
1
@incumbentvinyl9291 shouldn't they have stayed in Europe then?
1
@walesdoesntsuck6635 their country to ruin.
1
@walesdoesntsuck6635 they were there for thousands of years before Europeans. Based on that Germans are not native to Europe.
1
@walesdoesntsuck6635 Afrikaners arrived in 1692. Bantu arrived over a thousand years before.
1
@walesdoesntsuck6635 what's the matter with you? Wiping out other populations? The Cape is a semi desert. No Bantu peoples were there, everywhere else in South Africa was inhabited by Bantu peoples. And nice redirection away from Rhodesia.
1
@walesdoesntsuck6635 nothing. Hunter gatherer populations in forests which had tiny populations. Bantus migrated through savanna corridors they didn't occupy. And how? Do Somalis have the same right to Sweden as Swedes? Germanic people came from the Steppe. Europe was inhabited by hunter gatherers before agriculturalists and pastoralists came from the east. Based on your argument, Nigerians and Somallis have the same right to England and Sweden as any Germanic person.
1
@walesdoesntsuck6635 a simple Wikipedia search can disprove that. You're just dishonest.
1
@lucasgrey9794 Zimbabwe never became a communist state. There are no communists subverting US culture and Rhodesia was a segregated state which reserved most seats in its parliament for Europeans on the basis of race post 1969.
1
@lucasgrey9794 it wasn't their prerogative to rule a people on their own land against their will.
1
@lucasgrey9794 just for my amusement why would you suggest that?
1
@lucasgrey9794 no one wanted or asked them to. So what gives them the right. Furthermore, most blacks were just subsistence farmers not denizens of a first world country.
1
@lucasgrey9794 they were restricted to 16 out of 66. Really 8 because the other 8 was limited to native aristocracy.
1
@lucasgrey9794 and what gave an illegal government the right to even decide who could occupy office against the wishes of a majority?
1
@lucasgrey9794 okay?
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 it really isn't socialist.
1
@incumbentvinyl9291 they were Europeans. Blacks in Europe are Africans. They are just guests in a foreign land. I'm not even going to respond to the subverting nonsense.
1
@pavolkalmar9016 he caused that to happen.
1
It would be like naming Russia, Jochia.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 and?
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 could be a dead country like Rhodesia. Can't do any worse than dying so we'll be fine. Can't say the same about your soon to be extinct lot.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 it was only in jest but I did take you semi seriously until now.
1
@devinfraserashpole4753 from Rhodesia to Nigeria. To be fair Rhodesia being dead would be difficult to refer to.
1
@monkey7072 most of Rhodesia was poor. And how could they be ruled by a government they didn't consent to?
1
@luv2scrap741 read enough about it.
1