Comments by "Ayodeji Olowokere" (@ayodejiolowokere1076) on "Jabzy" channel.

@adamthundercock155 you know better than anybody how worthless a person you are.
32
@alexanderphilip1809 that's silly. In Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness he has a character remark how Northern Europeans were in a similar state of development relative to the Romans as the Africans were to them as European colonists. Your claim is easily debunkable.
6
Tadhg O'Rourke no I don't. The Bantu speaking population is native to the region.
5
Tadhg O'Rourke of course. Granted, non European residents in Europe don't impose apartheid on native Europeans.
5
@TehOmnissiah no but regular YouTube clown.
4
How is it different?
3
Tadhg O'Rourke I was saying Europe is for native Europeans only when it comes down to it. If native Europeans want the non native population to leave, they have every right to expel them. The dishonesty of drawing an equivalence between Rhodesia and the presence of non Europeans in Western Europe was my point.
3
Tadhg O'Rourke Africans benefit more from whites in Africa in the long run than the other way around. I don't mind them at all. My only point was against European or Indian only spaces in Africa, which offends me. I do not mind either being in Africa at all.
3
Tadhg O'Rourke people should assimilate into their host countries and respect their hosts. I wholeheartedly agree. I don't think there's anything to reclaim from Europeans or Indians in Africa, these days. I assumed you were saying Europeans were just as native to Africa as Bantu peoples when you made the initial comment.
3
@DeusExDraconian there was no such de-population in Central Africa before colonialism so your claim is nonsense. And acting like the Force Publique wasn't a colonial authority acting on instructions from colonists shows your dishonesty.
2
No one has ever claimed either was untrue.
2
@jamestcatcato7132 there is reference to land ownership and slavery in the Bible. Land ownership and slavery have existed in humanity throughout time and space. Your statement is false.
2
@Reactionary_Harkonnen sorry, all I heard was ooga booga. Now don't interrupt, adults are talking.
2
@niriop I researched the anthropologist. His argument was cannibalism was always a ritualistic practice and never an acceptable social norm the world over.
1
@niriop no. In Western culture heterosexual men will sodomize other men as a tool of humiliation in particular contexts. This doesn't make the act commonplace in the West. People in the West will mutilate their tongues and ears within certain tiny niches. In War time collecting body parts of enemy combatants is relatively common among Westerners. None of this is commonplace or widely acceptable but are motivated by ritual. They are widely spaced out incidents that occur among tiny groups as a ritualistic gesture. Regarding Arens claiming cannibalism never occurred historically, I think it's more likely you misunderstood him.
1
@niriop re-read what I typed then message me again. Read it slowly.
1
@niriop I see.
1
@mikicerise6250 Historians say accounts of cannibalism in the Caribbean by Conquistadors might have been exaggerated. No one has ever said these things didn't take place in Mesoamerica or the Caribbean.
1
@MikePurdue-ky9pm you don't even know what tribe that was, where did you get that?
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen the Spanish were slaughtering these people unprovoked to open the way for unrestrained rapine. Historians will tell you these accounts are in the same vein as accounts of cities made of gold. These tales are fiction and exaggerations to justify atrocities. There are plenty of accounts of cannibalism in post civilization Europe, the Middle East and East Asia. In Europe they'd eat mummies as a cure all elixir, in the Middle East, their enemies as a gesture of hatred and in China as a gesture of extreme hatred.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen what kind of stupid point is that? Europeans weren't slaughtering each other as well so they should be destroyed? And that stupid little tangent about Aztecs applied to all Amerindian societies? And my point was cannibalism existed everywhere, even in societies that had long passed the threshold of civilization, even in early modern Europe. Freaking genius.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen something is seriously wrong with you. I think we're done. By the way, remembering the population decline of the 1200s Mongol conquests gave me a good chuckle. Thanks for that.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen you said globally. What's wrong with you? And the Hundred Years War, the Crusades, the Bulgar Byzantine Wars, among many others took place among many others in that period.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen National Vanguard? I see. Kindly don't message me.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen If you refer to National Vanguard as a reputable information source you're not acting in good faith. So go waste someone else's time.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen you need to find help. Get lost.
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen go have a talk with your Nazi buddies on how Hitler was trying save Germans in Poland and how Britain and France forced a world war on him. It'll be more your habitat and save me the frustration of arguing with you people. Get lost, scram!
1
@Reactionary_Harkonnen case in point.
1
Olivier Wells they were absorbed by waves of iron smelting agriculturalists. And more power to you if you're only defending what's yours. Not that I think you're under siege.
1
@datnoob4394 That really was not the case. Rhodesia made no changes to its system until 1978, when the terrorists had all but won the war.
1
@Veriox22 I think it was suffer what they must.
1