Comments by "princeoftidds" (@MachiavellisThePrince) on "'The Five' dissects the implications of the Paul Pelosi attack" video.

  1. No one shed tears for Rand Paul but that doesn't mean violence against our political enemies is acceptable.
    2
  2. You're promoting domestic terrorism. Not a great look, LaRoo...
    1
  3. Nope.
    1
  4. Surviving a brutal attack doesn't make Paul Pelosi a hero.
    1
  5. Yes because an 80-year-old in a shootout has no possible downside...
    1
  6. Why is that funny, Richard?
    1
  7. You're a nutcase.
    1
  8. Speaker Pelosi was never in favor of defunding the police. Following legitimate news sources might help get you informed.
    1
  9. Nope.
    1
  10.  @MarineA109  he was a far-right extremist. Did you not know about it?
    1
  11. Trump lost his reelection bid and can't pardon anyone.
    1
  12. Just because the attack was politically motivated and the attacker was a right-wing extremist doesn't mean Trump's violent and hateful rhetoric is responsible for this attack.
    1
  13. No one has to convince you, it's not about you.
    1
  14. He was a right-wing extremist.
    1
  15. You're an absolute moron.
    1
  16. It's like Watters has his words written for him and those words manipulate undereducated rubes.
    1
  17. It was the terrorist's fault but I'm pleased that nutjob didn't have a gun.
    1