Comments by "carkawala khatulistiwa" (@carkawalakhatulistiwa) on "This Town Did The Impossible" video.

  1.  @JC-vq2cs  Soviet microdistrict vs USA Suburbia
    40
  2. You think the person living in the building you said is ugly. can buy a house in the new build. who stood over the house you destroyed
    8
  3. This home Not for poor people
    6
  4.  @abdamit  a public housing area with 40,000 low-cost apartments torn down replaced with 5,000 luxury apartments complete with a new shopping center + anti-homeless design installed in the gardens surrounding the apartment
    6
  5.  @tripanzo  You think the person living in the building you said is ugly. can buy a house in the new build. who stood over the house you destroyed
    3
  6. You think the person living in the building you said is ugly. can buy a house in the new build. who stood over the house you destroyed
    3
  7. The problem this home not for poor people
    3
  8.  @JC-vq2cs  YIMBY : density = Communists
    2
  9. You think the person living in the building you said is ugly. can buy a house in the new build. who stood over the house you destroyed
    2
  10.  @tripanzo  not all countries have oil money like norway. and more people live in slum housing with an area of ​​under 5 square meters per capital
    1
  11.  @tripanzo  you can still build a new home elsewhere. and increase the number of paskon houses. but don't destroy 10.000 poor people's houses to build 1.000 rich people's houses. and let 8.000 people live rent houses. and 1.000 homeless people. you morons . only to increase the value of your own property
    1
  12. Not for poor people
    1
  13. Soviet microdistrict vs USA Suburbia
    1
  14.  @invalleria  I don't agree with you. for replacing the housing of 10,000 poor people with 1,000 rich people. then making 8,000 people living on rental and 1000 people homeless.
    1
  15.  @invalleria  the government has always had a limited budget for social housing. if you can give a house to everyone but because the house is very simple then replace it with a nice house for the upper class to abstain from. but can only accommodate 1/4 of the population of the poor. Your social housing policy failed from the start. and this luxurious house is much more difficult and more difficult for the government to maintain. who have a limited budget. idiots
    1
  16.  @invalleria  second.more creative housing. binding only white workers. not a blue worker. secondly, moving health from one area to another does not solve the main problem why crime occurs, namely poverty and unemployment. spending money on this instead of creating jobs is a waste of government money
    1