Comments by "Michael 마익흘 Aronson" (@MichaelAronson) on "Teen Girl Pepper Sprayed At Trump Rally (VIDEO)" video.

  1. "there is clear video evidence that no such groping took place" There is clear video evidence . . . of something you didn't see? Do you think about these things before you type them?
    3
  2. "She punched the man in the face. Where I come from, that amounts to "provoking a confrontation"." She alleges that he groped her first. If true, then she didn't provoke the confrontation.
    2
  3. "The protesters cause the problems." Protest is legal in the United States.
    2
  4. "the left benefits from violence" If this were the case, then why do Trump supporters keep acting out violently?
    2
  5. "agitators all paid in full by George Soros' MoveOn.org" Evidence?
    2
  6. What does that mean? We're both on the internet.
    1
  7. "throwing punches is not legal you dipshit" I never said it was. Why are you being verbally abusive?
    1
  8. "Must be anti-Trump protesters provoking a confrontation at a Trump rally." What is "provoking a confrontation"? They're protesting. That's legal.
    1
  9. "she was not protesting." It's clear she was a protester.
    1
  10. ***** You "don't throw punches art my rallies moron"? I don't have rallies, and I'm not sure what "punches art" is, but you probably shouldn't throw it.
    1
  11. +William Bayles "let me brake this down for you" Why, are you going too fast?
    1
  12. "you back off them every time and bring up grammar" The difference between "brake" and "break" is not a grammatical one. They are actually different vocabulary words. You should probably figure out the difference before accusing other people of stupidity.
    1
  13. D*R*E*B*I*N 893 D*R*E*B*I*N 893 Have you heard of punctuation?
    1
  14. ChristianMission "no other rally has opponents attending and disrupting them" Indeed. Trump supporters are only at Trump rallies, and violence is only at Trump rallies. Hmm . . .
    1
  15. John Connor Aha, so Trump supporters are only at Trump rallies, and only Trump rallies are violent. Meanwhile, Bernie supporters are at Bernie rallies and Trump rallies, and only Trump rallies are violent. Hmm . . .
    1
  16. "that's a grammatical error" No, not understanding the difference between two different words is a vocabulary error.
    1
  17. Not understanding the difference between grammar and vocabulary is also a vocabulary error.
    1
  18. I'd like to see Trump supporters defend this: http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/03/30/watch-man-offered-free-hugs-trump-sanders-rallies-results-speak-volumes/
    1
  19. "Because Bernie supporters and BLM cretins keep causing violence." Evidence?
    1
  20. "there are SO many cases where regressives go to these rallies just to cause violence" Evidence please.
    1
  21. She was allegedly groped. That would take the issue to a whole other level.
    1
  22. ChristianMission And yet there is no violence at rallies of any other candidate. Hmm . . .
    1
  23. "there is evidence that no groping took place" There is no such thing as evidence of a thing not existing. Holy shit, you really don't think about these things before you type them.
    1
  24. "he presents an alibi, he is presenting evidence" An alibi is not evidence. An alibi is an alibi.
    1
  25. "an alibi requires evidence" What does this mean? An alibi is a person with a personal testimony. That's all an alibi is.
    1
  26. "Either way, this has nothing to do with the subject." Indeed, which is why I found it so amusing that you brought up this tangent and then argued it so poorly.  "The bitch was not groped" I'm afraid your bare assertion isn't very compelling.
    1
  27. "She was physically violent first" This is true, but if she was groped before that, then that changes things.
    1
  28. It is apparent through her angry accusations leading up to the punch that that's why she threw the punch. Again, we don't see the groping, but it would be unusual for someone to get so irate over a fabrication.
    1