Comments by "Michael 마익흘 Aronson" (@MichaelAronson) on "Trump Dividing The Nation BIGLY" video.

  1. "so I should’ve voted for a Clinton??" Nah, that would require you to have principles first.
    5
  2. "Obama is no longer President, he should be left alone. That is what I hear from liberals every time I mention him this days." Why do you keep mentioning him? "When was the last time TYT commented on a positive story about the president?" Trump suggested banning bump stocks. TYT covered that last week.
    4
  3. So you're upset at TYT, but you've been watching them for at least two years. Hilarious.
    3
  4. "A bump stock ban would only work if you could ban shoelaces and belt loops also because with those two things you can make your own bump stock." Okay . . . ? I'm not arguing about its merits. I'm answering his question.
    2
  5. "Exactly what principles does Hillary Clinton have?" I didn't say Hillary Clinton had or didn't have principles. I said a voter would need to have principles to correctly choose between the candidates.
    1
  6. "We choose candidates based upon their values, their voting record (if any), and policy positions." Well, some of us do. "What principles would a voter that chose Hillary over Trump possess?" For starters, someone who doesn't want an illiterate dumbfuck calling all the shots.
    1
  7. Or, "I'll stick to the candidate who didn't brag about sexually assaulting women, and isn't facing dozens of accusations of sexual assault."
    1
  8. "No, we all do." Not all of us, dude who ate too many people and presumes to speak for them. "Generally, when people say "for starters" at the beginning of a sentence, they will not end that train of thought so abruptly" When people say "for starters," they provide the first example of an implied many. Whether or not the other examples are provided does not invalidate the implication of the first. "the only thing you named was a negative against the other candidate" The only thing I named describes one person who was involved in the 2016 election. Well, maybe Ben Carson too.
    1
  9. "None of your non-sense still has anything to do with why principled people should have voted for Hillary Clinton" She's not an illiterate dumbfuck. It's an incredibly low bar, but she clears it effectively. "You cannot name any examples of positive things about Clinton" I am not here to name positives about her. All I've said is that she was the superior of two choices for any principled individual.
    1
  10. ^example of projection
    1
  11. "Shill" Who is paying him?
    1
  12. "well no one is paying "him"" So he's not a shill. Thanks for clarifying.
    1