Comments by "" (@anshuraj4277) on "Mandir or Masjid — Why an acceptance of truth u0026 slow reconciliation is needed and not new surveys" video.

Literally no one denied that Even Hindu kings broke Hindu temples
13
@rahul3134 Temples were broken in varanasi to build so called corridor Country can't be run on emotions Its good to look past Not to use it to muddle future Lots of temples...Stupas and mosques were broken by kings of all faiths As almost all kings were Tyrants Better to leave past in past Discuss it as history not future policy
6
@Rajan112358 Thousands of places have been destroyed of all faiths Hindu kings have looted temples as they represented wealth and power No king was good Or without bloodshed Be it Marathas or Mughals U can never correct history As value system then was different We must discuss past as past Countries obsessed with past destroy thier future
2
Lots of Buddhist temples were destroyed to build Hindu temples U support restoration of that?
1
@Rajan112358 Same for temples built on Buddhist stupas?
1
@elborrador333 Actually the temples were attacked by all kings as they were symbol of power and wealth Temples were built by Mugals as act of patronage and politics Its lazy to reduce complexities of past as religious war Mugal rule was in alliance with Rajputs Mugals had hindu commanders Shivaji had Muslim one Back then it was about power and expansionism
1
@Rajan112358 Everything I said was fact Many rulers destroyed religious places including Mugals Morons are people like u who want to be selective We can't change past Its violent on all sides
1
@Rajan112358 All things are true Buddhist stupa destruction Temple destruction by Hindu rulers And by Auranzeb too It was a norm back then to destroy places of worship of lost party all over the world When holocaust happened it was not norm What a fucking lazy thing to do by comparing everything to holocaust instead of dealing with norms of medieval India
1
@elborrador333 It's not what about ism Its about the fact that it was norm then A lot of hindu kings did Not coz they hated temples But coz it was norm then Brahimins destroyed buddha stupas But it was all when India was not democracy It is now
1
@elborrador333 Oh there is no argument of Bhaichara Auranzeb was tyrant expansionist So were most kings Martha attacked pillaged burned Bengali villages Why? Power and expansionism of then
1
@miloblackmetalhate UC Hindus are amongst literally richest group in country U r not oppressed just like Whites aren't in USA Stop ur fake victim complex U Genocidal maniac Mocking RSS is good though With people like you its India which won't be well
1
@sundareshanal1849 It's TRUE Read up a bit And not RW nutjobs
1
@surajs5913 It was destroyed as revenge of landlord revolt Kings were brutal and tyrant Lots of temples...stupas mosques have been destroyed We should learn about it and we do But not obsess over it
1
@surajs5913 Nehru was not against Somnath construction Just of use of public money for it Hindus kings destroyed temples too And Buddhist Stupas on behest of Brahmin priests There is no historic wrong It was the norm in medieval world all over the world You'd know if u were not RW nutjob with fake victim complex Also...I hope u also support giving reparations for historic and continuing wrong of caste violence Reservation just doesn't compensate for that barbarism
1
@surajs5913 Attack on temples is not genocide When did I deny attack Auranzeb was a tyrant and a murderer Point is most kings were No empire grows without killing and pillage But we are not in medieval century anymore Just tell if u are for reparation by money to SC, ST and OBCs for caste or not?
1
@surajs5913 Reparation in terms of hard money..good for u Unfortunately we don't see that happening U r describing brutality of Muslim ruler's invasion Nobody denies that But invasion is not genocide Marathas pillaged Bengali villages...raped women... Were they uniquely evil? No It was norm then to do this to loser in war Hindu kings did same to hindu temples Buddhist stupas and temples were destroyed by Hindu kings Again...bad in 2022...norm then India as political democratic entity emerged in 1947 Back then there was no constitution Now there is And Places of Worship Act is part of basic structure of that It's easy to see history as US vs Them When reality is far more complex than it suits anybody
1
@surajs5913 Reclaiming of temples would have to happen then not just for Buddhist stupas but for different sects like Vaishnavite etc I don't deny brutality of Mughal Empire But what kind of genocide was going on that Rajput kings were allies of Mugals Emperors had Rajput Wives and daughters Rajput generals too I never said you should forget it But u should look past in its context and not by lens of today By ur definition Marthas committed genocide of Bengalis But ofcourse they didn't It was another brutal invasion
1
@surajs5913 Am not saying u r denying Am saying...u can't go digging up past It's a ploy to distract from current problems Ultimately whatever happens is to be decided by courts But its undoubtedly another way to attack Muslims and distract everyone else It's cute that people like u fall for it Can u change everything that happened in past? No Better to treat past as past not future mission
1
@surajs5913 There is no pride in destroying temples either by Mugals or Hindu Kings But there is no shame in acknowledging Hindu Rajputs were allies of Mughals and destruction of worship places was common practice by victors There are literally thousands of such places on all sides
1
@surajs5913 Auranzeb atleast in part had Rajput blood He was just another brutal Indian king Not ancestor of all Muslims 😂 Anyway....our earliest ancestors were from Africa Then our Aryan ancestors if u r in North came from Central Asia
1
@surajs5913 https://youtu.be/l3HS6UnAAM8
1