Comments by "B Dale" (@bdale5231) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. 156 K How, in your mind, does a handful of individuals become 'y'all'?
    1
  2. 156 K Firstly Mr./Ms. ('black/white') you're very presumptious! Secondly, your response is more tantamount to reiteration, rather than explanation. But thanks all the same
    1
  3. Mr. Unseen I don't understand your implied correlation between - being in receipt of 'welfare', and being drug addled, violent criminals? Is this also in the stats.(but unquoted), that you cite as reference?
    1
  4. I would be extremely interested in hearing the views of his wife in this regard!
    1
  5. AdelaeR Nice!
    1
  6. jason mckay It's mildly interesting that you don't see bigotry here. But I'm more concerned with your statement referring to this person's 'power', or lack thereof. I would contest that, as an academic, he has more power than, for example, an unskilled, poor, 'white' person
    1
  7.  @bostonphotographer20  They were only ever in your imagination - if you recall
    1
  8. illanoiz1 Every one of them male
    1
  9. Justice Hall Do you want women to trust men?
    1
  10. Debora Rios Are you insane? Let's all go back and change history shall we? What a damned fool way to look at today. This attitude of yours is what is 'ridiculous, absurd and ignorant!' "the same people you enslaved...etc."; No-one alive today is the embodiment of these long dead people!; "Have you forgotten.." some supposed conversation between centuries dead people!? If you are unhappy with TODAY.. and clearly you are unhappy (if not unhinged), then deal with that TODAY.. NOW! Dragging up situations from another era advances nothing. And that is what it was.. an era, a time when the barbarity of slavery existed in many parts of the world, and not a single 'race' escaped it. America isn't special or unique in this aspect. All other countries, races, religions, sexes.. etc. are doing their best to move forward with today. Try it! NB. and wouldn't it just ruin things for you (p#*s you off) if we COULD go back and change history, and you find that the world majority would do so?!
    1
  11. delaze 23 Good to know! ;) Unfortunately, the ignorant and foolish shout louder, and are given far more attention than they deserve. It makes people wonder
    1
  12. Munashe Msipa I'm not sure that you fully realise all that you've said there? Maybe re-read it
    1
  13.  @DR-br5gb  What mental illness are you referring to, as you haven't mentioned any here?
    1
  14.  Fuktard Fagtroll  Would be very interested in any citations regarding these claims!?
    1
  15.  @jonathans4503  Well if you're not going to have your own children - wreck everybody else's!
    1
  16. olskoolrap I do not understand the difference in education that you speak of... don't you all go to the same schools.. and for the same years?
    1
  17. Darker Star Exactly the same schools are there for all though.. aren't they? I'm simply trying to get to the facts of it, and to understand how someone can say that any given group 'gets the worst education'
    1
  18. I wouldn't entertain either of them
    1
  19. All are already included, by virtue of being in this group - P E O P L E
    1
  20. Marco Favela Do you have an 'ugly past'? I haven't
    1
  21. Fixie4life Where were 'legal situations' cited in this video? I missed that
    1
  22. angel gonzalez History didn't favour 'people'.. until long after the dinosaurs! History is a record of the 'past'. Something to look at, and possibly learn from.. not a blueprint for how things should be seen and perpetuated. You cannot live on, or in it. Where would there ever be any progress or improvement in any sphere in that way?
    1
  23. Just make sure that you vote for the right people in whatever country you are in!
    1
  24. faultroy Domestic violence is covered by the Centre for Disease Control?!
    1
  25. Tall tales?
    1
  26. Niobiumtan Incorporated Nicely put
    1
  27. Gi'raffe! (It's in the pronunciation)
    1
  28. The Oily Boily Guy See my earlier comment
    1
  29. nakesha Skerritt-philip So presumptuous.. and cheery!
    1
  30. Justin Elkin By what criteria do we judge women? Can/should we use colour there?
    1
  31. Justin Elkin Then what? We have no guidelines for the judging of women. I wouldn't want to do it wrong! Edit: or perhaps they are pre-judged?
    1
  32. Justin Elkin I'm sure they are.. but you cited Martin Luther King (who i had always greatly admired) So with that in mind.. i again ask - how are women to be judged.. as they were wholly absent from that much quoted part of his speech? I have no intention of looking to today's brand of 'feminists'!
    1
  33. So will there be separate 'reparation accounts', for women.. the poor.. the handicapped.. victims of crime.. any aggrieved 'race'.. etc.? Or will they all be lumped into the one? Or, perhaps, none of the people who are/have been disadvantaged matter.. unless they are 'black'?
    1
  34. MACHINES have buttons - is that what you are?
    1
  35. Can anyone please enlighten me as to the area/subject of this person's professorship?
    1
  36. Can only say - 'ABSOLUTELY!'
    1
  37. Well done FOX! You have now gone so far down! "The murderer"? ..far right? .. You are judge and jury now? You've just about lost all credibility with that fact-lacking, propaganda-filled piece - another one bites the dust
    1
  38.  @prodigygamer5469  ??? Where do you see that?
    1
  39.  Op Hs  and the alternative is?
    1
  40. Maybe 'angelic'? They are swarming war vessels after all!
    1
  41. Not even albinos are completely void of color 'POC' is a nonsensical phrase
    1
  42. Poor patronising pillocks!
    1
  43.  @greenmindzane6148  Try this analogy - Each year there are 'x'-number of motor vehicle-related injuries/hospitalisations/deaths Are there constant and regular updates given out via news media, with regard to the number of 'road-users'? - I won't go into it further for now
    1