Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "Whistleblower reveals 'earth-shattering' news in Hunter Biden investigation | The Bret Baier Podcast" video.

  1. Where did that come from?
    7
  2. If someone says something against people you don't like, it's "truth"?
    6
  3. Yay Jimmy! You really got 'em this time! Right? RIGHT?!
    4
  4. If Trump is still walking around, this guy is safe. Stop being a drama queen.
    3
  5.  @TheHopetown  What trial, genius? Do you actually think we hold a trial for someone who PLEADS GUILTY? Boy, did yer mama have any kids that lived?
    3
  6. "Hunters court trial will be interesting if it even happens." <<< Conservatives, this is how smart you are. Your brethren think that pleading guilty results in a trial. THIS is yet another example of why Americans overwhelmingly chose Joe Biden in 2020. It wasn't because we love Joe, it's because conservatives are mentally deficient.
    3
  7.  @wadekaplan9379  Congratulations Wade, You got 'em THIS time! Right? RIGHT?! 🙄
    3
  8.  @TheHopetown  Look around, bud. We all know this, and we don't care. Conservatives don't care, and sane people don't care. You should keep copying and pasting this on every video you see, and find out if anyone cares.
    2
  9. WRONG! It's 71 felony indictments SO FAR!
    2
  10. Flush out your headgear. If Trump is still walking around, these nobodies will be perfectly fine.
    2
  11.  @garymccray7822  What evidence have you seen?
    2
  12. We got 'em this time!!! This time is different! 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  13.  @annebreitrick6116  Credit where credit is due: That was a great reply. 👍
    2
  14. "The whole family is involving"? How is the weather in Russia?
    1
  15. Did you people put Republicans in charge of it? What did you expect?
    1
  16.  @rogerthomas169  An "interview" is not evidence. Or do you think everything Karine Jean-Pierre says in her interviews is "evidence" to prove her stories?
    1
  17.  @PhaQ2  So, you have no evidence. Yes, you strung me along for a bit. But you traded your integrity for that. You are a stellar example of a modern "conservative": No long-term vision, no sense of honor, and no self-respect. Just blind hatred of your fellow Americans.
    1
  18.  @rogerthomas169  He has texts? Oh, why didn't you SAY so? My God, a man who "has texts" must be legit! You've seen these texts?
    1
  19.  @rogerthomas169  "We all will" is conservative BS for "no".
    1
  20.  @PhaQ2  I see no reply 12. Are you trying to put a hyperlink in your comment? Do YOU see your 12th reply?
    1
  21.  @chiefwarrant9719  How about you, big guy? You want to help poor PhaQ2 out and post any evidence you know of to support the allegations?
    1
  22.  @PhaQ2  I love the "YouTube ate my homework" excuse. Remember: No one made you abandon your integrity. You did that all on your own. But I am confident you will find a way to convince yourself it was worth it.
    1
  23.  @PhaQ2  You seem to be implying that you have been silenced, and that I did it. It will be obvious to anyone who finds our discussion in the future that I did not silence you. I disagreed with you, and that isn’t unfair, nor it is not fearful. Some may also conclude that you declared yourself a victim, and gave up on dialogue. Perhaps You want this to be true, because You want Joe Biden out of power. THAT sounds like fear.
    1
  24.  @PhaQ2  That's possible I suppose. I count a total of four (4) posts from you. That includes the most recent one that includes "...is either hidden from you, ..."
    1
  25. Silly conservatives, Garland is not in control of the IRS.
    1
  26.  @PhaQ2  Let me help you out, since you seem to be poorly equipped to identify what is wheat and what is chaff. We can read the (redacted) warrant that resulted in Don Plump's Mar-a-Lago club being searched. That warrant was only signed under penalty of perjury by a couple of LEO. The judge who granted the warrant is bound by the law, and subject to reversal and even discipline by the appeals court under which he rules. Those documents are actual, factual court records, as is the inventory of items taken from Plump's club. That's "evidence". You got any of that? Another example: Trump was found by a jury to be guilty of SEXUAL ABUSE. That shows you it has been legally established that a preponderance of EVIDENCE shows the leader of the Republican party is a groomer, and a rapist. You see how this works?
    1
  27.  @PhaQ2  You haven’t named a single piece of evidence, and you are asking where I went? Conservatives and their fairytales…
    1
  28. The IRS was "form"? I don't follow people who are illiterate.
    1
  29. LOL
    1
  30. Sorry, did this guy say his "oath of office" at 0:27?
    1
  31. No.
    1
  32. Watergate is no longer the gold standard. Thanks to the Republicans and Trump.
    1
  33.  @Scumbagballless  Can you name any evidence? Any at all?
    1
  34. Something IS happening. Republican politicians go on TV daily to complain to the voters. Why are you voters not solving the problems? LOL
    1
  35.  @rogerthomas169  Irrelevant. I also saw on TV that Joe Biden was a genius. Just because it's on TV does not mean it is "evidence". Why can't you comprehend that? Are you able to find your way to work each day, or does someone have to take you?
    1
  36.  @PhaQ2  You can't name a SINGLE piece of evidence, can you? Not even to defend your own "honor". Grow some stones, and name some evidence. Or is that dress too tight?
    1
  37. Sure bud. Trust the Republicans to do that.
    1
  38.  @patriotpatrol3709  Can you point to any posts where someone hates the whistle blower?
    1
  39.  @PhaQ2  Oh I am ASKING to see. Asking to see the EVIDENCE! LOL! You boys got any evidence?
    1
  40.  @TheHopetown  You are only fooling yourself. Describe the evidence, if you can.
    1
  41. Sure.
    1
  42. If Don Plump is still breathing, this nobody has nothing to worry about.
    1
  43.  @SugmaDLigmaNutz  You need to stop taking drugs, son.
    1
  44.  @PhaQ2  False choice. I counted the comment total, then the visible comments. There are in fact 5 more comments than are actually visible. I have some idiots blocked, so that is not unusual. Did you post those comments under PhaQ2, or one of your other screen names? If you are double dipping, it's very possible I have blocked your alternate screen names. But since your posts are showing up under PhaQ2, why don't you copy and past that "evidence" you say you've already posted.
    1