Comments by "BigKandRtv" (@BigKandRtv) on "'Brutal' poll shows Trump beating Biden in 6 swing states" video.

  1. I hope you’re going to come up with a better excuse and November than that.
    9
  2. Robin, have you tried getting a job?
    9
  3. Are you basing that on how you and your family feels, or do you have a sense of what the roughly 300,000,000 Americans think?
    4
  4.  @Shadow_Banned_Conservative  it sounds like you’ve learned to wait until the votes are counted. Good for you!
    2
  5. Nope, it’s the Trump party. You know how he likes to put his name on everything, and he owns the RNC lock stock and barrel.
    1
  6.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Trump voters are willing to keep "Obama Care". Evidence: Trump promised in September 2016 to repeal Obama Care and replace it with "Healthcare Reform to Make America Great Again". He didn't. And trumpy voters are on the verge of making him the Republican nominee in 2024. Ergo, trumpy voters find "Obama Care" acceptable.
    1
  7. Do you remember what I have told you?
    1
  8.  @bigswampy6073  Gold does. Because he knows. Deep down, he knows.
    1
  9. You can’t keep using that excuse. Find a new one for November.
    1
  10.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Ah, now the excuse will be IDs. Got it. Maybe you should go ahead and get your protest signs and flags printed early. You might get a discount.
    1
  11.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Why do you assume I am against something that we have not even discussed? Are you hallucinating? Did the "voices" tell you I am against showing ID when voting?
    1
  12.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Yes I support both. Can we get back to the original topic of this thread?
    1
  13.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  this thread is about the election, but you’re trying to talk about the border? You’re trying to talk about voter ID, which is the states purview? Republicans created and then killed the law to address the border, and you want to know if I’m mad at the executive branch about that?
    1
  14.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  YouTube sux, that’s for sure.
    1
  15.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Let's cite some specific instances that are not opinion. I will offer one: The SCOTUS ruled last year that the Republican controlled Alabama State Legislature broke the law by drawing and using voting district maps that illegally discriminated against black people. See Allen v. Milligan. Now you give me a FACT I can look at. No opinions please. Give me a verifiable fact.
    1
  16. Yeah? And polls showed Hillary beating Trump by 4%. We all know how that turned out.
    1
  17.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Can you see that reply?
    1
  18.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  I will try that. Number one. I have had to show my ID when voting my entire life.
    1
  19.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  number two. I am unlikely to ever support anything that appears to have the effect of suppressing the peoples votes.
    1
  20.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  can you see number one and number two?
    1
  21.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  to get a mail in ballot, you have to apply. On the application you have to provide either the drivers license number or identifying number from your state issued ID card. Absentee mailing balance will only be mailed to the address on file with the state.
    1
  22.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  “Less secure” question answered: I do not know that to be the case. And I read 13 of the 60 lawsuits Trump and republicans filed (and lost).
    1
  23.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  I assume you can’t see the reply…
    1
  24.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  I am in a deeply red state, and the process I cited is current as of today. Name a state and I will look it up.
    1
  25.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Fair enough, that’s a state rather than political party. Point me to either pending legislation or completed legislation that buttresses your perception. I am willing to try and defend a position I believe in, but first let’s establish that it is a real position.
    1
  26.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Uh, no.
    1
  27.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  And as far as "is this legal for citizens to be involved in the federal election system?" This is from the US EAC: " If there is time, getting input from citizens and community groups is recommended." John, I understand your PERCEPTION. Show me something that supports that perception.
    1
  28.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  If you can only tell me about your feelings and not point to evidence that one political group wants "less-secure elections", yes. I am not asking how you feel, because I already know. I am asking you for evidence that one group wants "less secure elections". And donating money that was given to more than 2,400 county election offices around the nation does nothing to prove one political party wants "less secure elections". The thousands of county and city election districts decided how to spend the donations.
    1
  29.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Don't hate me, that's the US EAC. That is what each local election commission is being advised. You do realize I am not the EAC, right? Please tell me what evidence you know of that one group wants "less secure elections". Tell me what to search for, and I will read it. I trust you saw EVIDENCE of that before you formed your current opinion...
    1
  30.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Actually, you are dodging my question. I have asked you several times to tell me what evidence you know of that shows one political group wants "less secure elections". Stop dodging and avoiding. The more you evade, the more I think you are disingenuous. Give me any information that supports your opinion, and I will search it and review.
    1
  31.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  All of your questions follow you asking me to defend why one political group wants elections to be "less secure". I said I don't think that is real, and asked you to cite why you 'feel' that way. You said that robot-boy gave money to the election boards across the US. Maybe I am in error when I assume you would offer something to show that one group wants the elections "less secure".
    1
  32.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  How about it people? Any of you want to proffer evidence that one group in the US wants elections to be "less secure"? Not opinions, not feelings. Point to something OUTSIDE your melon that I can review and evaluate.
    1
  33.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Oh, I acknowledged that you feel that way. But I didn't believe the position you feel (and have asked me to defend) was actually real. I asked you to tell me what evidence you think I should look at that indicates one political group wants elections to be "less secure". If Tech billionaireS donating to more than 2,400 election offices in all 50 states is what made you conclude one group wants elections to be "less secure", I have to disagree with your assumption. Likewise, I will decline to defend the position for which I see no proof it exists. We've been back and forth numerous times here, and at this point I am confident that if you had evidence you would have shared it (or at least named it).
    1
  34.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Oh, I am not honest? You made a claim I disagreed with. And you won't give evidence that one political group wants elections to be "less secure". You want to change the subject, then call me...."aloof"? John, I have engaged you. I have invited anyone else who shared your views into the discussion. I do not think that word means what you think it means.
    1
  35.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Border and abortion? Stop changing the subject. Focus. You said one political group wants elections to be “less secure”. If you can’t find evidence to support that, just say so.
    1
  36.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  I spent the better part of the day discussing politics with you and you claimed that I am distant from politics? You claim that one political group wants “less secure” elections, and then lash out at me when I ask you for evidence to support your position. No wonder you vote the way you do.
    1
  37.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  watch and learn what intelligent people do. Here’s my position: Trump voters do not love the constitution and they want to suspend it. Now, why do I believe that? I believe that because on December 4, 2022 Donald Trump said on truth social that we need to suspend the constitution. Furthermore, everyone knows this. Because MAGA knows this and still supports trumpy, MAGA support suspension of the US Constitution. See how debating works? Now you try it.
    1
  38.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  More straw-man arguments from you? Let me show you how to do this: Trump voters support attacking the US Capitol. The evidence to support my claim is: on May 10th, 2022 and March 12th, 2024 trumpy said publicly that he would pardon Jan 6 convicts. He called those felons "political prisoners". Trump voters are on the verge of making him the Republican nominee for President. Ergo, Trump voters support beating up cops and attacking our Capitol. Come on John, you can do this.
    1
  39.  @Elena-jl5jv  Since the swing states trumpy needed to win in 2020 were run by Republicans, and REPUBLICANS said their counts were correct- NO. Do you think the counting process is completely inadequate?
    1
  40.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Trump voters are O.K. with having a beta male as President. Evidence: After losing the election, trumpy filed and lost 60 (SIXTY) lawsuits claiming essentially that the election was stolen from him. He lost all 60. Additionally, since leaving office he has been either a criminal or civil defendant in no less than 6 (six) actions. Two of the six are beyond the verdict stage, and trumpy has lost both of those. In all 6 legal actions, trumpy has tried and failed to get these actions dismissed. He then cries and says every one treats him mean. Ergo, trumpy voters are O.K. having a loser in the White House.
    1
  41.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Now, YOU offer some evidence that indicates one political group wants "less secure" elections. Or, acknowledge that it is your feeling, and you can't find direct evidence.
    1
  42. Only the dumbest Americans think this inflation came from Biden. All of us know Trump printed a grand total of 7.4 trillion new dollars while he was in office. Then he pumped it into an economy that was at a standstill because he mishandled COVID. Every man, woman and child with a brain knows the inflation that we experienced came from Trump.
    1
  43.  @margoalamoto3903  Remember: MAGA is pro-criminal. They like crooks and thugs.
    1
  44. Yeah, that’s not true. Sane Americans know that Trump‘s own Attorney General has called trump a criminal who is unfit for office. Blaming Joe makes you (and trumpy) look weak.
    1
  45.  @stephenwalsh5683  LOL
    1
  46. Why would Biden debate someone he has already beaten once? What would be the point?
    1
  47.  @lovemyalaskaful  <<< appears to have read the constitution.
    1
  48.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  Keeps being deleted.
    1