Comments by "J" (@jtgd) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46.  @marshall2.015  because parents can and already have created controversy against school officials over something that actually wasn’t applicable under the law, but the parent believes a 6th grader seeing the Statue of David equates to pornography IN AN ART CLASS. People criticize it because the wording is so ambiguous, what actually violates the law isn’t objectively specific. Because it isn’t specific, parents can invoke it, or point to it while claiming “THE LESSON IS PORNOGRAPHIC” just because their kid sees a picture that’s not actually considered porn, and is literally one of the most well known pieces of art in human history. Doesn’t matter whether Disney cares or not. Doesn’t mean it’s ok for state governors to punish companies because they disagree with what the governors do. The first amendment applies to companies too, and suggesting free speech suddenly shouldn’t apply to companies that produce media might as well be your argument to weaken the freedom of speech in the constitution. If Disney approved the law, DeSantis wouldn’t have done anything negative to them, and you probably wouldn’t care. But since it’s the opposite, it’s okay for DeSantis to target companies that dare criticize anything he backs, under threat of financial retaliation. Now if that’s alright, and a newspaper in Florida criticizes DeSantis, it’s also fine for him to make legislation that increases taxes for that specific business, right? I really don’t get how you don’t comprehend the actual issue. Has nothing to do with Disney or even DeSantis. It’s a question of whether he did or did not retaliate against a business for criticizing his law he signed. It’s a first amendment issue, and DeSantis has openly indicated that his actions against Disney was related to their criticism.
    2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2