Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "The New York Times' FBI-Informed And Hypocritical Project Veritas Hit Piece" video.

  1. The art of the smear. That is what we've really had since JFK, as the media was gradually bought up and monopolized by a handful of Trotskyists. They were the same people behind the Lincoln Project, and earlier, PNAC, under Bush. On the left, it was under Clinton and Gore. These same Trotskyists were who ran the smear campaigns on McCarthy and RFK, and they were known as the New York Intellectuals. Most of this leads back to radical religious groups in the late 1800s, in the UK and US. That led to the creation of the Rand School of Social Science in NYC, and it's progressively grown since then, especially through the thirties with three colleges in New York, who based what they were doing on some in the UK.
    9
  2.  @rolanddeschain965  It was okay while the Senate and House were only targeting the Stalinists, but when they targeted the Trotskyists, the smear campaigns upon McCarthy and RFK began. Hoover warned about them as well, and they targeted him by threatening to expose his relationship with Tolson. The rest of the dirty laundry on Hoover, I believe, was a fabrication by the Trotskyists, who were running the blackmail honey traps, and were within the mob. (Think JE and GM). The Trotskyists, until this very day, claim to be anti-communists because they disliked Stalin. That is the biggest lie ever told, as Trotskyism is just another flavor of Marxist-Leninism and communism, which they call international socialism, and third way politics. They went so far as to even back fascist Italy and the NSDAP in Germany, all because they were against Stalin. They called Soviet socialism "nationalistic." It's the same rhetoric and deceit that we hear from them today.
    2
  3. @Scoot Beans Read about Ruskin (1819-1900) in the UK during the Victorian era. That's when it first infected the colleges, and spread out. Rand copied this idea about their library. Ruskin became a lecturer, and started speaking on his ideas for economics. "Ruskin argued that a 'vital law' underpins art and architecture, drawing on the labour theory of value.," which was said to be from Marxian economics. He was criticized for this. You'll notice that this movement starts in the arts, and not in the sciences. Next, think of the Decadent Movement later on, which started in Paris, where early socialist artists wished to tear down the old order, to bring in the new via art and architecture, and Ruskin was pro-impressionism. This movement is why we later ended up with a pile of excrement or garbage being called art.
    1