Comments by "Wei" (@wile123456) on "Denmark's Election: Why the Winner Immediately Resigned" video.

Some notes: 1 the red bloc includes the green party, Alternativet, why not have them in the graphic lol? 2 Great coverage of the mink scandal, you covered it better than most danes short term memory 3 the mink industry is beginning to reopen 4 They aren't called the social liberals, they are called radikale venstre. (radical left) stop misappropiating our names into english versions that no one uses 5 the reason the blue bloc lost is because of infighting. You mentioned lars løkke a former Venstre leader, but also inger støjbjerg who was a big name in venstre before she was sentenced with 2 months of prison/house arrest after abusing her minister powers to illegally seperate immigrant couples and later kicked out of parlament, she, like Lars løkke, formed her own populist party, appealing to rural areas and stealing votes from venstre. Moderaterne also took many votes from venstre. So they went backwards almost 50%. That combined with the conservative party running for stateminister challenging venstre weakened the blue blocs chances. The conservative leader, søren pape, also made racist comments about greenland, refusing to apologize and when he finally did apologize it was a weak half assed apology, done in a TV debate, used rethorically to make Mette Frederiksen apologies for the mink scandal. His party looked to become huge in the polls, instead he lost 2 seats. The future is unsure, wether it will be a broad government or a left wing one. Most parties want multiple parties in government this time, compared to last election. (also yes, racism is normalized in our country's politics, so if you wonder why so many scandals are about it, then its par the course for Denmark.)
8
@jakewilliams7851 yea it's better to just call them radikale Venstre, like he called the big venstre, and not left
2
@Google_Censored_Commenter 1 the North Atlantic seats are important, yes, however mostly needed when you explain you need 90 seats for a majority. If you don't get nitty gritty with the numbers it isn't as relevenay, but yes as a teacher I always make sure to mention them and their votes as they do play a key role. 2 if they made mistakes, mention the mistake lmao. And it can only be surface level in a 5 minute recap 3 if even just 1 farmer is reopening mink farms, then the industry isn't 100% dead. That's what I meant. For the case of the animal abuse the industry caused, it won't end it permemantly. 5 enhedslisten and radikale always fight each election due to having polar opposite economic politics. But they agree about progressive values, especially to opposé the blue blocs racism and transphobia. Radikale has also in recent years only supported a social democratic stateminister and hasn't pointed to venstre. But you don't see the same vote stealing as in blue bloc. Alternativet did get some votes from enhedslisten, but a lot of people in Copenhagen voted for them to make sure they got over 2% for example.
1
@Google_Censored_Commenter So my point is, moderaterne and Danmarks demokraterne, New parties with former venstre leaders, is far more infighting than on the red bloc. Venstre being so small also meant they got very few kredsmandaterne. Because while the last seats are spread out so folketinget matches the percentage, as explained in the video, the first seats go to the majority winners in each valgkreds. Because of forholdstalsmetoden and socdem dominated due to ventre being weakened, giving them more seats.
1
@Google_Censored_Commenter The infighting wasn't detrimental when they didn't bleed votes like the blue bloc did. Biggest losses from that bloc was radikale Venstre, whose voters probably went over to moderaterne more. And yes, the North Atlantic votes are important, but for the past 2 decades now they've made 3 red seats and 1 blue seats. Of course the chances of any Greenland seats being blue is now 0% after the normalisation of racism the blue bloc engages in
1
@Google_Censored_Commenter Yes, racism in Danish politics, especially against people from greenland, is very normalized. The fact Søren Pape defended his racist remarks and never did a proper apology, and when he attempted one, he used it as a stunt on national TV against Mette Frederiksen shows that while taboo, its not really punished enough. No person in this country should be able to hold the racist opinions he holds if racism wasn't normalized to some extent. Likewise all the hate against muslims in the country, and the fact we break UN human rights law, by discriminating against people of colour in certain neighbourhoods. We also try to copy the english Illegal Rwanda deportation policy, and the socdems and everyone right of them fully endorses it. So when over 50% of the electorate votes for and supports such blantant racism and human rights violations, then racism is quite normalized here.
1
@Google_Censored_Commenter Yes, and Frie Grønne got 30% vote share in the areas affected by ghetto loven, such as Vollsmose. People there had no voice and there finally was an anti-racist party speaking for them. Also your last sentence just proves you're racist yourself 😂 "nooo it's the greenlanders that are the real racists" fucking cope, dude. I meet a dumb d'âne online and of course they are racist. You know denying the existsnce of racism and denying that systemic racism exists is some of the most openly racist things someone can do.
1
Its only clickbaity because Mette Frederiksen is lying. Enhedslisten, the far left party, supports her as prime minister as long ss she doesn't work with the blue bloc. She wants to make a broad government because that was her promise before the election
1