General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "Special Counsel In Trump’s Classified Documents Case Rejects Judge’s Request For Jury Instructions" video.

@efrenrodriguez4329 "Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, the Archivist of the United States SHALL assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President" THATS what the law says
3
@The_Conqueeftador Congress is a political body that has no authority to charge or absolve anyone of a crime. Has NOTHING to do with anything lol
2
@efrenrodriguez4329 Wrong again
2
@efrenrodriguez4329 First off, this case has literally nothing to do with the right to declassify, and no Executive order gives anyone that right. you're thinking of a policy change for when things get automatically after a certain period of time (2009)
2
@efrenrodriguez4329 Nowhere in the presidential records act does it allow a former president to keep government documents, classified or not, after leaving office. You clearly haven't read it lol
2
@efrenrodriguez4329 Where does the PRA say hes entitled to have them? Cite it. Specifically
2
@efrenrodriguez4329 Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling??
2
@jordangourley3955 Which is why Smith is going to have the 11the circuit overturn her (again) or even remove her.
1
everyone has a right to a fair trial.
1
If its fair for the government its fair for everyone
1
@StoneShards You clearly haven't read the constitution lol
1
@StoneShards Republicans literally campaigned and successfully got the supreme court to rule that corporations have mostly the same rights as humans in the citizens united case. Please educate yourself
1
 @StoneShards noncorporeal, "corporate", personhood was invented by republicans 20 years ago. Please educate yourself
1
@StoneShards You said Only human beings can have "rights". Now you admit noncorporeal corporations also have rights. hahaha I win.
1
@Sbxallday This means that all trials must be speedy
1
@Sbxallday Just because you deny it doesn't make it true. lol
1
@Sbxallday Cant handle the truth eh?
1
@Sbxallday Project more lol
1
@billypardew2337 Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling?
1
@billypardew2337 Clinton literally didn't say anything in the case. You clearly dont even know what this case was about🤣
1
@thomasprice1320 So you admit I cited two laws, 19 and 32. Got it. So whats the problem?
1
@thomasprice1320 We all watched trump try to claim the documents were his for over a year on social media. His guilt couldn't be more obvious
1
@thomasprice1320 There are Military tribunals coming. More proof you haven't read the constitution and dont have a clue as to how it works. haha
1
@thomasprice1320 the fact that you don’t know where to look up our laws demonstrate that you have no business being in this conversation. haha
1
@thomasprice1320 what makes you think you cant Google title 19? 😂🤣
1
@thomasprice1320 now stop deflecting and answer my question. Where in the records act does it give the president the ability to declassify. Be specific.
1
@KaiserBlade NARA knows what's on the tapes and they determined it was unclassified PERSONAL notes. Cope
1
@KaiserBlade We know exactly what trump had because we searched his house hahaha
1
@KaiserBlade trump wasn't supposed to have ANY government documents so why did he spend 18 months refusing to return them? lol
1
Where in the constitution does it say this? Specifically
1
What in the world makes you thin Smith is losing anything? haha
1
According to the law biden hasn't done anything wrong. Cope
1
"we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" Hur report
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Nothing illegal about his appointment
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Smith has already appealed to the 11th Circuit Court and won. TWICE! lol
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Just because you say it was illegal doesn't make it so lol
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Not even close to that the Appointments Clause of the Constitution says hahaha
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Smith is not a principle office and no office or department was created around him lol
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq 25 cfr 600.1 "The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted" Better luck next time
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq I have read the amendment. Thats how I know you're wrong lol
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Lets take a closer look at the last section of the appointments clause "Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments" Huh. Would you look at that that, I was right. 😂
1
@JohnWarner-lu8rq Better luck next time🤣
1
@The_Conqueeftador How would prosecuting someone for crimes they committed while in office cause a chilling effect. DONT break the law and you wont have anything to worry about lol
1
@The_Conqueeftador investigating election fraud IS NOT a duty of the president. Proving you wrong is too easy
1
@The_Conqueeftador Political speech like jan6th is NOT an official duty. Swing and a miss.
1
@The_Conqueeftador So why was trump refusing to return thousands of government records AFTER he left office on jan 20th 2021? Why was he still doing so 18 months later? Too easy
1
@The_Conqueeftador How does prosecuting someone for the crimes they commited somehow break the separation of powers? Where does the constitution say a president is above the law? Please explain
1
@The_Conqueeftador Why would Biden or obama be charged with they haven't broken any laws? Sounds like they live rent free in your head. haha
1
@The_Conqueeftador He didn't ask for an investigation and that STILL is not an official duty of the president. Where does say that?
1
@The_Conqueeftador why was trump refusing to return thousands of government records AFTER he left office on jan 20th 2021?
1
@The_Conqueeftador Why was he still refusing to return government records 18 months after he left office? Why cant you answer this simple question?
1
@The_Conqueeftador You have yet to cite any laws or passages from the Constitution that supports anything you're trying to argue so dont even start with the legal acumen BS because clearly dont have any. 😂
1
@The_Conqueeftador Asking election officials in swing states to magically find the exact amount of votes you need to win is not an official act of ANY office. hahaha
1
@The_Conqueeftador I see your answers, nobody is censoring you. Its just that you're wrong. lol
1
@The_Conqueeftador When did I ever say there were no investigations? hahaha
1
 @The_Conqueeftador Its not the job of the president to investigate elections. Why would we allowed political people to interfere in elections they are running in? What sense does that make?
1
@The_Conqueeftador Everytime you post you further demonstrate you have no idea what the law, or the constitution says or how they work. Just embarrassing yourself
1
@efrenrodriguez4329 Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden dont have classified records they are trying to keep, so what are you even talking about? lol
1
@buddykaiser2380 not even close to what he said
1
@buddykaiser2380 Cite the exact quote from Hur of him saying that "Biden was essentially guilty but that he didn't think he could get a jury to convict" Go on. ill wait
1
@buddykaiser2380 Nobody was frantically destroying anything. Just because you say she broke the law doesn't make it true.
1
@buddykaiser2380 The law LITERALLY says that senators and VPs have fully legal authority to keep documents. you should try reading it
1
@buddykaiser2380 "His possession of documents was not a basis for prosecution because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep classified documents in his home." Robert hur
1
@buddykaiser2380 5 CFR § 1312.23 "Classified information may be made available to ANY person only when the possessor of the information establishes that the person has a valid “need to know” and the access is essential to the accomplishment of official government duties." 🤣
1
@buddykaiser2380 If you cant see responses then sort the comment section by "new" All comments are visible then.
1
@buddykaiser2380 "Classified information may be made available to ANY person only when the possessor of the information establishes that the person has a valid “need to know” and the access is essential to the accomplishment of official government duties." Thats what the law says 😂
1
@buddykaiser2380 The law I just quoted says VPs can. Sooo what evidence do you have that they cant? You're all talk and no substance
1
@buddykaiser2380 What dont you understand about Hurs report that "as vice president and president, he had authority to KEEP classified documents in his home"???
1
@buddykaiser2380 Literally everything you said is wrong and you have no evidence showing otherwise. Why do you think you know better than justice officials and our courts?🤣
1
@buddykaiser2380 PS, The law doesn't care what you "personally believe" The law only cares what you can prove with evidence and you have nothing.
1
@buddykaiser2380 Just because you say he had no legal right doesn't make it true. lol Where is the evidence that supports your argument? Do you have a law or precedent to cite? No? didn't think so lol
1
@buddykaiser2380 Why did Hur say "he had authority to KEEP classified documents in his home" if he didnt? Again, what makes you think you know better?
1
@phoneemail2035 The Constitution doesn't address any of those as the concept of something being classified didn't exist until WW1 lol You clearly haven't read the constitution
1
@phoneemail2035 When did I say that POTUS doesn't have the power to declassify. Please learn how to read
1
@phoneemail2035 The Penn Biden center did not receive any money from anyone. This has been debunked. The university did. But not the biden center. Swing and a miss
1
@phoneemail2035 Clinton wasn't hiding classified docs in his sock drawers. Wrong again
1
@phoneemail2035 You proved you have no clue what the constitution says or what legal precedent is. Too easy
1
Nothing malicious about it
1
In what way do you think 2204 (c)2 applies here?
1
@blabberwulf7650 Again, WHERE does it say that? Why cant you cite it? You cant even explain how 2204 (c)2 applies lol
1
@blabberwulf7650 Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling?
1
@blabberwulf7650 Still Waiting! Cant answer the question eh?
1
@blabberwulf7650 what makes you think the law gives you a choice? Lol
1
@blabberwulf7650 ALL presidential records go to NARA upon the conclusion of a president’s term of office. That’s what the law says. Please educate yourself.
1