General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Won’t Take Up Trump’s Jan. 6 Charges—At Least For Now" video.

@kitekirax The LAW says it was an insurrection. Get over it
6
@@nathanrobinson862 Smith is going though the lower appeals court as we speak lol
3
@@nathanrobinson862 And the lower court is expediting it so we will know shortly after new years
3
@j.r.warren5794 You dont get to say it it was an insurrection or not. Courts do.
3
@shanegram2623 Dont hold your breath
2
@michaelschwader7944 He does not need to be convicted. Have you even read the Constitution?
2
@michaelschwader7944 Trumps not in office so he does not need to be removed. Hes just disqualified
2
@michaelschwader7944 You clearly dont understand how the law works
2
@GeorgeSkinner-eq1jd There is no harassment or abuse. All laws are being followed. You just dont know what they say
2
The Appeals case is going to rule by mid Jan and we will be back on track. Relax
2
@scottroland1272 Courts decide legal matters. Not people
2
@@user-hw6xm3nf3w The law says trump is not qualified so why would we let him on the ballot?
2
I dont think you understand what that term means
2
@kitekirax How is this election interference? Do you even know what the legal definition of it?
2
@kitekirax Cherry picked CCTV does not contradict anything whatsoever. Nice try
2
@TonyCortez420 HOW has biden intimidated voters? 😂 Is this a joke?
2
@TonyCortez420 Biden as not gotten involved with any of this so what are you even talking about?
2
@j.r.warren5794 The only thing you are looking at is your bias
2
@j.r.warren5794 You keep calling it unconstitutional but you have not even read the Constitution so how would you know?
2
@j.r.warren5794 The accusations have been proven true. Keep up
2
@j.r.warren5794 A crime was committed. This has been confirmed by multiple courts.
2
@j.r.warren5794 Every time you call a judge "woke" you prove how biased you are
2
How is the case going to collapse?
2
Nothing unconstitutional about it
1
Just remember that if trump has blanket immunity then so does biden
1
@yusefhasan7524 If they dont decide by the january deadline he will be off the ballot
1
@kitekirax Writeins would not be counted
1
@kitekirax Why are you acting like biden would be the only candidate listed on the ballot?
1
@user-ez7xu7ue9s A republic is a type of democracy 🤣
1
False
1
@tessalister1226 None of that happened.
1
No hes not
1
Nothing illegitimate about it
1
Not taking it up ultimately hurts trump as w know the lower courts will rule against him
1
I dont think you understand what happened here
1
@GeorgeSkinner-eq1jd If you knew what they said then you would now there is no abuse or harassment
1
@GeorgeSkinner-eq1jd The White house has literally nothing to do with any of these cases
1
@GeorgeSkinner-eq1jd The way you talk about your dear leader makes it sound like you're in a cult
1
@GeorgeSkinner-eq1jd The country is not being destroyed. Please educate yourself
1
no it doesn't. This is literally how the system works
1
Only this case is stayed. The other cases continue to move forward
1
And what makes so so sure that the NY AG case will be overturned?
1
@scottroland1272 Have you even read the 14th? You dont need to be convicted for it to apply
1
@scottroland1272 Joe does not have any business
1
@scottroland1272 Nothing you posted about joe is a crime. and even if they were it would not constitute a reason to remove him.
1
@scottroland1272 Thats just your biased opinion
1
@scottroland1272 Because trump engaged in insurrection and is therefor disqualified under the 14th
1
@scottroland1272 You clearly have no idea what's going on hahahah
1
@scottroland1272 Biden did not engage in insurrection.
1
@scottroland1272 Trump did
1
@user-hw6xm3nf3w you're clearly confused
1
@scottroland1272 Learn how to cope
1
@scottroland1272 He said protest peacefully once. He told them to fight and take back the country before its destroyed over 20 times
1
@scottroland1272 Why are you holding water for this wannabe dictator?
1
@KJ-rd6tz Lots of people have been convicted
1
@KJ-rd6tz did you miss all those sedition convictions?
1
@tlindsay1007 The border is being protected. The Constitution is being fully upheld
1
@scottroland1272 False
1
@scottroland1272 Again, Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling
1
@scottroland1272 We all know he mean fight as in attack the capital to keep him in power. He know it and so did they.
1
@scottroland1272 She should not have been trying to break into congress then
1
@scottroland1272 The fact you're trying to bring race into this proves you have no leg to stand on
1
@KJ-rd6tz Where does it say he has to be charged with anything for section 3 to apply?
1
@KJ-rd6tz There is evidence and he has been charged with crimes
1
@scottroland1272 She was attacking congress, so yes. She was a threat. You dont get to make that determination.
1
@scottroland1272 She was storming congress. Thats the definition of an attack
1
@scottroland1272 "climb through a shattered window beside a barricaded door into the Speaker's Lobby" Thats what an attack looks like😂
1
@KJ-rd6tz The Colorado Court had a weeks long trial. You just did not pay attention
1
@KJ-rd6tz The only one with bias is you
1
@Whoknowsme007 no, they aren’t.
1
@TonyCortez420 Why are you deflecting?
1
@TonyCortez420 Project more
1
Keep dreaming
1
@j.r.warren5794 How is this constitutional? This request is written right into the law
1
@chadbrowski2508 Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better
1
Nothing illegal about it.
1
@earnestleesaddened3779 That does not somehow make anything illegal lol
1
@earnestleesaddened3779 You know there is only one way this is going to end right? And thats with the court saying he does not have immunity
1
@@nathanrobinson862 You know this is not a win for you right?
1
We have always had legal qualifications. Not our fault hes not qualified
1
@RobRochon How does it have anything to do with the campaign. Explain
1
@RobRochon How do they not have substance? Smith references the law in everything he does. You should try reading it
1
@RobRochon How would you know what the law says when you have not read it?
1
@RobRochon What legal commentator has said the charges wont stick? Specifically
1
@RobRochon Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling?
1
@RobRochon This has to do with trumps criminal actions. Not his opinion.
1
@RobRochon If you read the indictments then you would know what hes charged with. Listed on the first plage
1
@tlindsay1007 Why are you lying and who do you think your fooling?
1
@tlindsay1007 Congratulations on posting 200 words on absolute nonsense
1
@RobRochon You dont even know what banana republic means
1
Dont hold your breath
1
@RobRochon You know trump is going to get his trail no matter what right?
1
@RobRochon This has literally nothing to do with the election next year
1
@RobRochon A Court already ruled in smith favor so if they dont take it up it just means that ruling stands.
1
Thats not even close to what it means
1