Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "How The 14th Amendment Could Derail A Trump Candidacy" video.

Nothing in the 14th says he has to be charged in order for him to be disqualified under it
3
@garym2187 Constitution disagrees with you
3
FBI never said that. And they aren't the ones who make that decision in the first place
1
Nothing in the 14th says he has to be charged in order for him to be disqualified under it
1
Trump said protest peacefully once. He said fight and take back the country over 20 times! lol
1
@ajv7575 no democrat one ever called anyone to violently riot lol
1
@ajv7575 Why are you acting like trump has been indicted for a single speech in the first place?
1
@ajv7575 Strange how multiple courts have said it was an insurrection lol
1
@ajv7575 and how dozens of people have been convicted of sedition
1
@ajv7575 that’s exactly what you said
1
@ajv7575 it obvious that Trump wanted them to violently riot. Because they did.
1
@federalistpapers4523 No one cares about the GOP dog and pony show. They are just trying to distract from trump
1
He doesn't need to say that for it still to apply
1
Evidence? Try reading the indictments
1
Nothing in the 14th says he has to be charged in order for him to be disqualified under it.
1
@VictoriaLynn59 not what they said and they dont get to make that call in the first place lol
1
@LL-fb8wz Wrong.
1
@LL-fb8wz His disqualification is not contingent on a charge or conviction according to these filings under the 14th..
1
@LL-fb8wz Jurors are for criminal cases. lol
1
@LL-fb8wz This has nothing to do with a criminal case whatsoever
1
@LL-fb8wz The 14th does not say anything about being proven guilty. It just says "engaged in"
1
@LL-fb8wz This is what I mean when I say you dont have any idea what this lawsuit is about! lol
1
@LL-fb8wz I never rated its chances of working. I argued you haven't even read what the argument is!
1
@LL-fb8wz Its a legal fact that it was an insurrection. Courts have determined it to be so
1
@LL-fb8wz The law makes the final determination and it did so over a year ago.
1
@LL-fb8wz that’s not what I said
1
@LL-fb8wz I said courts have determined the event was an insurrection
1
@LL-fb8wz according to the 14th amendment lawsuits, state election officials, simply need to determine if Trump “engaged” in it. According to that argument, each state would get to determine this individually.
1
@LL-fb8wz how do you know if it was a weak argument or not if you didn’t bother listening??
1
@LL-fb8wz do you just let other people tell you what to think?
1
@LL-fb8wz Btw, in my opinion I don’t think it would be a smart idea to disqualify Trump or anyone else from running for office without some sort of convection, despite what the 14th might argue
1
@LL-fb8wz I agree. Very dicey without a conviction. Even if the 14th allows it.
1
@LL-fb8wz we already see how the GOP abuses every policy, law and procedure they can. How long do you think it would take them to start abusing this determination?
1
He does not need to be charged with insurrection. Thats the point
1
because he broke the law and tried to overturn democracy lol .duh
1