Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "Another GOP Lawmaker Faces 14th Amendment Insurrection Ballot Challenge—Same One Used Against Trump" video.

@NWstockoperator who says it’s not true? You?😂
1
@NWstockoperator how does controlling manner not include qualification decisions?
1
@NWstockoperator what election issue had ever been adjudicated in a federal court? Specifically
1
@NWstockoperator you’re all talk and no substance. Basic reading of the constitution proves you wrong at every turn
1
@NWstockoperator ” article 1 section 4 is about how states execute their elections” EXACTLY! That includes determining who is qualified
1
@NWstockoperator how many different courts and judges have to prove you wrong before you learn?
1
@NWstockoperator it is true. It’s how it has always worked.
1
@NWstockoperator the first interaction law was passed 60 years before the Civil War
1
@NWstockoperator interaction law was passed in 1808😂 Civil War wasn’t until the 1860s
1
@NWstockoperator you don’t even know you’re basic history!
1
@NWstockoperator what in the world makes you think you know better than the nations judges and constitutional experts? Seriously
1
@NWstockoperator Jack Smith has literally nothing to do with this😂
1
@NWstockoperator trump is not a constitutional expert. He hasn’t even read the constitution.
1
@NWstockoperator you can’t even admit you wrong about your history
1
@NWstockoperator says who? You don’t get to say what matter means and his context
1
@NWstockoperator five seconds ago you brought Jack Smith onto this, when he has nothing to do with this. That’s how easy it is to prove no idea what you’re talking about
1
@NWstockoperator Again, says who? You’re trying to make up your own definitions. That’s not how it works.
1
@NWstockoperator elections is a (state) local matter as the constitution clearly says
1
@NWstockoperator you can’t even name a single educated person that supports your argument
1
@NWstockoperator not a single scholar supports anything you’re trying to argue
1
@NWstockoperator you can’t even directly respond to what I’m saying 😂
1
@NWstockoperator the insurrection act wasn’t prepared because of the Civil War
1
@NWstockoperator you clearly don’t know your history
1
@NWstockoperator just Google the insurrection act. Says 1807
1
@NWstockoperator and now you’re trying to deflect
1
@NWstockoperator Google the insurrection act and tell me what year it was passed. What are you afrade of?
1
@NWstockoperator you did not give a single example of a federal court adjudicating a election issue
1
@NWstockoperator who is qualified to be on the ballot is the manner of which an election is held.
1
@NWstockoperator you have no facts. You haven’t said a single thing to support any of your arguments.
1
@NWstockoperator if you studied law, then you know everything I said is correct
1
@NWstockoperator your entire argument is “ because I said so”. You gotta do better than that.
1
@NWstockoperator that court has not taken up any election issues or whatsoever
1
@NWstockoperator the DC court under Chutukin is handling issues of immunity and criminal charges. Literally nothing to do with the election or its process
1
@NWstockoperator My argument is based on the ruling of multiple state courts
1
@NWstockoperator you still can’t even name one example of a federal court handling an election issue😂
1
@NWstockoperator you clearly haven’t studied the law
1
@NWstockoperator election interference is a criminal issue. It’s not an election issue. How do you not know that?
1