Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "Citizenship Will Be Granted Only To These People If 'Birthright Citizenship Act' Passes: Brian Babin" video.

@cathyfisher7894 Who cares how Germany does things? This is America bud
16
@stephenyoung3328 You might want to read up on United States v. Wong Kim Ark
12
@cathyfisher7894 Germany has universal healthcare. Are you going to push for that because Germany is doing it?
12
Canada and 30 countries do the same thing we do. Educate yourself
11
The constitution disagrees
11
@tedbell4416 You might want to read up on United States v. Wong Kim Ark
4
@ You think this is going to somehow save you money? hahah
3
@katharina... The mean has already been clarified in United States v. Wong Kim Ark
2
everyone in the US is under the jurisdiction there of lol
2
This is false
2
This is false. United States v. Wong Kim Ark
2
@TheRevanchists everyone who steps foot in the US is subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Educate yourself
2
@TheRevanchists The constitution provides equal rights to everyone whos within our borders. Have you even read the constitution?
2
@twb123 that had nothing to do with the Chinese exclusion act. You clearly didn’t read the case.
1
@twb123 the Supreme Court clearly ruled that it does not matter if the parents are here legally or not. You’re still a citizen if you’re born here. Educate yourself.
1
@twb123 birthright citizenship has literally nothing to do with legal residence in America. What about the words “ ALL PERSONS” don’t you understand?
1
@twb123 yet the exclusion act wasn’t mentioned once in the case arguments or it’s ruling. 🧐
1
@ either way your argument as a whole has been refuted. It does not matter the status of the parents. If you are born here, you are a citizen. It’s been that way for over a century. It’s not gonna change now.
1
@ the arguments presented in the case, and the ruling of the court had literally nothing to do with the exclusion act. It’s not that hard to understand.
1
@RabidDisposition we can easily take care of everyone. We just choose not to
1
@tedbell4416 Constitution supports vaccine mandates. This has been upheld by the supreme court many times over the last 150 years
1
@ You clearly dont know you're history.
1
@ You just admitted you're willing to just ignore the constitution.
1
@ You must have missed the news were courts have already blocked it called it unconstitutional lol
1
@Very different situation. You clearly dont know what you're talking about. Nice try though
1
@kltpzyxm_ Cant handle the truth eh?
1
No its not
1
@TheRevanchists This is false
1
literally the fist thing the 14th says lol
1
Everyone whos in the US is under the jurisdiction of the US lol
1
@ Again, everyone who is in the US is subject to our jurisdiction. I already said this and so has the supreme court. Educate yourself
1
@ You might want to read up on United States v. Wong Kim Ark
1
@ Wrong. You're just trying to ignore the constitution and the supreme court
1
@ By your logic next time dems are in power they will pass a simple bill and reinterpret 2a to mean you must be in the national guard in order to have a firearm. Is that the game you want to play going forward?
1
@ By your logic next time dems are in power they will pass a simple bill and reinterpret 2a. Is that the game you want to play going forward?
1
@ say goodbye to 2A!
1
@chromedmaserati This is false. Can you show data that this is happening?
1
@ Wrong again
1
@ united states v. wong kim ark. Read it and weep
1
@ “the jurisdiction of the nation within its own territory is necessarily exclusive and absolute. It is susceptible of no limitation not imposed by itself.” The Court therefore interpreted that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” qualification of the Fourteenth Amendment APPLIES to children of foreign citizens in the United States" too easy! 🤣
1
@ nobody said the parents wouldn’t be sent back. You’re clearly confused lol
1
@ also, if you’re dangling your hopes in a right wing Supreme Court siding with you, don’t hold your breath. this is way way out of bounds for the moderate judges. Sorry
1
@worldtraveler721 I never argued. The parents wouldn’t have to go back. You’re clearly confused.
1
@worldtraveler721 court generally allow parents to stay in the country if their child is a citizen. That’s not gonna change. That’s just common sense.
1