Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "'What Role Do Motives Play There?': Gorsuch Questions Jack Smith's Attorney In Trump Immunity Case" video.

@carolynwilken7421 there were literally no anomalies in the election count
2
@carolynwilken7421 trump entire election team, including his hand-picked cyber security expert and already told him he had lost. He simply refused to concede.
2
Keep dreaming
2
@grey5751 So much for that "executive decision" of yours lol Yes you told us you made entirely meaningless point. Im just now asking why you did it. Why is that so hard for you to answer? lol
1
@grey5751 What cope moment? Im just asked a simple question and you for some reasion are unable to answer it. Dont get upset with me because you cant answer the question lol
1
@grey5751 Except it was pointless. You could have just answered the question and be done with this by now. lol
1
@grey5751 You're point was that he wasn't commenting about the video, which is a pointless thing to say. So why did you say it? Simple question.
1
@grey5751 why did you make such a pointless comment ? Not really a hard question to understand.
1
@grey5751 the question is WHY. Do you not understand what that word means?
1
@grey5751 you can deny what we all know to be a meaningless point all you want. But that doesn’t answer the question I asked. My question was about why. Haha
1
@grey5751 still can’t answer the question 😂
1
@grey5751 I didn’t ask whether you thought it was pointless, because it objectively is. I asked why you made it. Stop deflecting.
1
@grey5751 why would I be frustrated with your inability to answer simple questions? It’s embarrassing for you not me.
1
@grey5751 why do they have to talk about the topic of the video in order to post a comment? How is that baaad? 😂 Who made you the comment police?
1
@grey5751 I’m not arguing. I’m asking you questions. I’m a curious person.
1
@grey5751 funny how I saw you are arguing with people because they were wrong. I can’t, but you can? You seem to think people shouldn’t make certain types of comments. I’m challenging their narratives. Two different things.
1
@grey5751 next time don’t make such meaningless comments to people just because you don’t like the content that they’re discussing and we won’t have to do this again
1
@grey5751 You deflected from your pointless question for 3 hours. You couldn't be projecting more if you tried
1
Nobody is above the law. That’s the argument. 😂
1
@dennisg4053 this is false. Stop lying.
1
@grey5751 Making more meaningless posts I see 😂
1
@carolynwilken7421 wrong again
1
@carolynwilken7421 trump asked them to them to find him enough votes so that he would win the election. You’re just making stuff up as you go.
1
@ketanjibrownsfavemolester7592 just embarrassing yourself again
1
@ketanjibrownsfavemolester7592 cry harder❄️
1
This is how people look at the Trump administration😂
1
There’s only gonna be one end to this and that is that Trump doesn’t have immunity
1
@ketanjibrownsfavemolester7592 Still triggered over the fact that I utterly humiliated you I see lol
1
@ketanjibrownsfavemolester7592 grow up child
1
@stuckie3916 Except he didn't do that. lol
1
@stuckie3916 If obama had murdered someone then he would have been indicted for it a long time ago lol
1
@cleenlivin Yes, after a lower case hears it. Which they did. Whats the problem?
1
@cleenlivin Democrats successfully impeached trump twice. This is a fact.
1
@cleenlivin Impeachment happens in the House. And the house successfully voted to impeach him twice. What dont you understand about that?
1
@cleenlivin Impeachment is a political issue not a criminal one. Has literally nothing to do with charging a former president with crimes lol
1
@cleenlivin Congress cant bring criminal charges because congress isnt part of the justice system. Thats is not what impeachment is about. Impeachment is a political remedy for POLITICAL issues.
1
@cleenlivin Yes, they did. Thats how the justice system works. That doesn't make the CO cases somehow unlawful or that they are somehow partisan or biased lol
1
@cleenlivin Courts disagree with each other all the time. Thats literally how the legal system is designed. A court disagreeing with another court doesn't somehow mean one court was acting in a partisan, biased or unlawful manner. hahaha
1
@cleenlivin Now that i've proven you wrong you're trying to change your story lol
1
@cleenlivin the senate can absolutely convict someone whos been impeached. Because its still a political issues not a legal one lol
1
@cleenlivin Congressional conviction after impeachment and criminal conviction are two very different things, neither of them are depending on each other.
1
@cleenlivin You clearly haven't even read the constitution. Please educate yourself
1
@cleenlivin you’re just continuing to prove that you have literally no idea what you’re talking about😂
1
@cleenlivin you can’t charge a former president with a crime if they haven’t committed a crime. So how would this turn into a freefall? 😂
1
@cleenlivin immunity from crimes doesn’t exist and it hasn’t been a free-for-all before. Why would that change now?
1
@cleenlivin the only people trying to Weaponized the justice system is Trump with his made up immunity claims
1
@ketanjibrownsfavemolester7592 just embarrassing yourself child
1