General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments
Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW-dz7ij) on "Ivanka Trump Tries Getting Out Of Testifying In NY Fraud Trial" video.
@Silverlined_69 Why are you pretending like mar a lago is the only element of this case?
2
@Silverlined_69 Wrong again.
2
@Silverlined_69 Where are you getting this nonsense from?
2
@Silverlined_69 Why are you making excuses?
2
@Silverlined_69 Again, cite the part of the case that you think validates your argument lol
2
@Silverlined_69 You're just proving you have no idea how the law works
1
@Silverlined_69 Judge found him guilty at the start of trial. Not before
1
There is literally no evidence of them acting corruptly
1
HRC lives rent free in your head
1
@Silverlined_69 Its your argument. Yet you cant support it with citation's?
1
@Silverlined_69 Or perhaps you already know you're wrong and you just wont admit it
1
@Silverlined_69 So cite the section of case law that you think supports you.
1
@Silverlined_69 Stop making excuses
1
@Silverlined_69 When have you ever seen a link in a YT comment thread? 🤣
1
@Silverlined_69 Just paste a quote from the case, as I did. Its not hard.
1
@Silverlined_69 I quoted the PRA and I quoted JW V NARA lol
1
@Silverlined_69 Posting the name of the case over and over does not magically support anything your saying
1
@Silverlined_69 I said you have no idea what the case is about and you still have not demonstrated otherwise.
1
@Silverlined_69 You're the one making the argument about this case yet you still cant cite anything from the case to support it!
1
@Silverlined_69 Well? Find anything yet?
1
@Silverlined_69 No? Didnt think so.
1
@Silverlined_69 All you did was cite the title of the case. you did not cite anything that actually supports your argument.
1
@Silverlined_69 Perhaps you dont understand what supporting evidence means??
1