Comments by "Jan Witts" (@janwitts2688) on "Grandad’s Still Got It! Vietnam's Newly Updated T-54Ms" video.

  1. They could get some good money from collectors for a few t34 and sus. .. probably enough for a few more upgrades..
    6
  2. It's likely a perfectly good vehicle that would chew through chinese units with a good exchange rate... it has the quality of quantity
    5
  3. Oks you goof balls.. Firstly it's 300 .. one of you even git that wrong.. Secondly there are plenty of parts.. thirdly most chinese formations have sod all armour other than some apcs fourthly so what the chinese have (BTW more than 6000) better tanks.. Vietnam has newer tanks for that.. it's chewing through the lesser formations that these will do.. fifthly china can only employ (at most) one 5th of its strength vs vietnam.. the rest are needed elsewhere so in your scenario 6000 /5 = 1200 which woud take on the newer vietnamese units but lah 3 to 1 numbers required.. Basicly you guys know dick all about warfare.. go read Wikipedia or something
    1
  4. I apreciate that.. but unless china deploys at least a third of their main mbts then it would be at a disadvantage due to distance terrain etc... you cannot air drop an MBT. . And even naval transfer would cause significant force depletion.. you need to have enough attacking force to count for depletion with distance and then still have 3 times the power so 60x3x3 so they would need 540 ish top line tanks just to counter this.... and that's assuming they have x9 infantry etc..Yes china is in a strong paper position.. no china cannot fight 9 to 15 different countries (possibly including russia) at the same time
    1
  5. Nah to you 2... The chinese aren't countering... they are the agressor.. agressors do not counter they overcome... for.. oh. About 5000 years armies have held that an attacker needs better logistics and x3 force on the battlefield to win... Obviously the x button on your calculator is as elusive as an education with yourself..
    1