Comments by "bruno bond" (@mrunning10) on "I wasn't worried about climate change. Now I am." video.

  1. YOU are clinically INSANE. Did you know that?
    4
  2. Your comment is so stupid you must be an AI Bot. Who the fuck ever said we're getting rid of all of the co2?
    4
  3. The fossil fuel lobbiests, PACS, SPACS, Koch Brothers own THAT territory. Pointless.
    4
  4. Look in your mirror for even more bullshit. Staring back at you all your life.
    3
  5. Just "do" something? The solutions have been here for over half a fucking century. And still no progress. Why? Because YOU vote for it. Wake the fuck UP.
    3
  6. The co2 that keeps alive 8+ BILLION people on this planet is already released into our atmosphere. It is having an effect, warming. Reducing population does not change this. Besides, how you going to go about "reducing population?" Hitler? Stalin? Pol Pot? The ONLY way is a TRANSITION to non-co2-emitting power while feeding the 8 Billion who occupy this planet.
    3
  7. Because humans pump 40 gigatons of co2 into the atmosphere every year that would have stayed UNDER the ground. I believe it's in the actually DNA of a climate change denier to be unable to even acknowledge this simple FACT.  @andrewdutton-nx3dh 
    3
  8. Your degree in Lawn Mower Repair tell you all this?
    3
  9. How the fuck does going "green" "transfer more wealth to rich?" Like do you even fucking HEAR yourself anymore? WHO are the RICH ELITE? What industry has generated more PROFITS and REVENUES in the history of man? Fossil Fuels. TRILLIONS. More power to politicians? Like the power of the politicians in place NOW election funded into office by FOSSIL FUELS. YOU are DERANGED. (or a liar, possibly both)
    3
  10. You constantly confuse WEATHER with CLIMATE. Stop. Wake Up. Try LEARNING something. The relation is VERY simple even for a simpleton. (are you one?) https://i0.wp.com/timesofsandiego.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Keeling-Curve.png?ssl=1 CONSTANTLY INCREASING C02. https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.37fdf42e75b54147472e955d6253b111?rik=qyzg3V5yiNOzVA&riu=http%3a%2f%2fberkeleyearth.org%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2020%2f08%2fglobal-mean-temperature-1850-2019-1.jpg&ehk=Ba70NQKzsZKabyaV%2bimvu0h3BRAN3OvFtnFUOCgJg4o%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0 MORE c02 = HIGHER temperatures. DATA from MEASUREMENT. No "agenda" No "control your life" No "IPCC collusion" No "scam" No shit sherlock. Increase the c02 and warm the fucking planet.
    3
  11. Everyone, except the manmade climate change conspiracy deniers.
    3
  12. Finally! Yes!! You'd be surprise how infrequently the only TWO solutions are ever mentioned. You running for US President? Got my vote!
    3
  13. The ultra rich go to COP using their jets to KEEP the MONEY from oil flowing into their bank accounts. Jesus don't you know ANYTHING???
    2
  14. What the Holy Frack you talking about?
    2
  15. If you actually believe what you just said, then you are CLINICALLY INSANE.
    2
  16. Who is saying to carbon capture ALL of the co2 out of our atmosphere? Your question doesn't even make any fundamental rational sense. You must be a bot.
    2
  17. Let's see here shall we? More people die of cold than heat every year! NOPE, NOT TRUE A LIE Global warming is good for the earth and humanity! NOPE, NOT TRUE ANOTHER LIE You got this backwards. NOPE, MANMADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS TRUE AND IT COULD KILL A GREAT MANY HUMANS. So, YOU are a LIAR.
    2
  18. "a scam" Yawn so tired of reading from the CLINICALY INSANE.
    2
  19. We need LEGS like the Fox News Bimbos!
    2
  20. MAGA-ON dude! Conspiracy Denial NOW! Conspiracy Denial FOREVER!! You ignoramus.
    2
  21. Who the Ficken is "Susan?"
    2
  22.  @eingrobernerzustand3741  You both are simply fucking WRONG. Those "other scientists" you mention, the deniers, are ALL PAID BY FOSSIL FUEL LOBBIES OR PACS OR "INSTITUTES" in some form or another.
    2
  23. Try smoking a different dobie dude it's limiting your cognition. @hwi62 
    2
  24. That's the WEATHER. NOT climate change, and NOT manmade climate change. Useless comment.
    2
  25. Great. Thanks for you "help" in fixing this fucking mess.
    2
  26. NONE of what you mention will fix this. Wake the fuck UP (please).
    2
  27. Throw that GED in the toilet and flush. It'll go down easy. The 2,400 GIGATONS of c02 we've released into the atmosphere is STILL there.
    2
  28.  @eingrobernerzustand3741  A "regulatory hammer" is NOT the solution to get the MONEY needed to build the fix. Wake Up.
    2
  29. Get used to it for the remainder of your lifetime. Get off your lazy arse and DO something to help fix this ficken fossil fuel mess. (it will make you feel better)
    2
  30. Simple and easy to fucking understand. That's the fucking WEATHER.
    2
  31. Have YOU ever fucking READ a 'scientific paper" your entire life?? (have YOU bred?)
    2
  32. And? So?
    2
  33. Wrong? About what exactly? Please post a link or reference to all the things "wrong." Otherwise why not crawl back to your MAGA Conspiracy Hole (MCH) were you belong.
    2
  34. Your WEATHER is NOT the CLIMATE.
    2
  35. Nobody, because that crap is in your fucking head. Wake UP from your fantasy please. You just might help save the planet for your descendants. (you breed yet?)
    2
  36. Wow! You remember the elites back 12,000 years ago? How was it??
    2
  37. Just one more thing, speak to your physician about UPPING the PHYSCOTROPIC MEDS dosage, because they're obviously NOT working. MAGA-ON Dude!  @dm.b7560 
    2
  38. ....and there YOU fall into the trap again. The subject is humanity's contribution source of co2, THIS: https://sustainabilitymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/original-1024x530.jpg This is co2 that would "normally" be UNDER THE FUCKING GROUND. Your "other factors" are not what we're fucking talking about. Take the area under the curve (know how to do that?) and you will get 2,400 GIGATONS that have been release by humanity (from the fossil fuels industry fucking PRODUCTION filings, not a fucking conspiracy theory) Now, calculate HOW MUCH FUCKING ENERGY IS ABSORBED BY THIS EXTRA CO2.
    2
  39. Spot Ficken ON Dr. Hossenfelder. But we need to ACT NOW. The planet has a great amount of environmental inertia. It took 250 years for humans to create this mess and it every year we wait to get a grip is another year added to fixing this, all the while the planet warms and warms and warms. Spot ON Dr. Hossenfelder. Aber wir müssen JETZT HANDELN. Der Planet hat eine große Menge an ökologischer Trägheit. Es hat 250 Jahre gedauert, bis die Menschen dieses Chaos angerichtet haben, und jedes Jahr, das wir darauf warten, es in den Griff zu bekommen, kommt ein weiteres Jahr hinzu, um das Problem zu beheben, während sich der Planet erwärmt und erwärmt und erwärmt.
    2
  40. Das liegt daran, dass DU ein UNWISSENDER bist, der für eine Gas- oder Pipeline-Lobby arbeitet. Fess up Lügner.
    2
  41. Republicans spend MORE than democrats historically. There goes YOUR theory. MAGA-ON Dude!
    2
  42. Republicans spend MORE than democrats historically. Do you have any theory as to why both sides of the voters think otherwise? MAGA-ON Dudette!!  @iam2512 
    2
  43. HORSESHIT Koonin, PAID by BP to write his denial book and give his denial lectures, talking about the WEATHER and why "plants need co2" crap. Dr. Steven Koonin is a horseshit LIAR.
    2
  44. If only the rising global temperatures would STAY at climates that "boost vegetation." We can't grow the food we need to feed 8 BILLION people in the ficken DESERT. And DESERT is where this ends up. Wake UP.
    2
  45. Your one big point of view is pointless. Humans will NEVER stop fucking. How about a fucking SOLUTION and not your "upper and lower" crap?
    2
  46. You ignoramus. The ones "with the money" are the fossil fuel industry. Wake UP.
    2
  47. Suggest? Why don't you go find out? (it's TRUE by the way)
    2
  48. That's called the fucking WEATHER dude. Every hear of it?
    2
  49. Space Aliens released it "in the past!" Didn't you know? For SURE you get MY vote for the STUPIEST person on this planet. Who released it in the past? My God! I can't get it out of my head!!!! Infinite Stupidity Concurs all.
    2
  50.  @rsmdogtrailer7145  You are simply wrong. And it DOES make you stupid. Thanks for your non-concern. Have you bred yet? Hope not. My God, "who released the c02 in the past?" You must suck the intelligence out of houseplants when you enter a room.
    2
  51. Doing anything to help fix this or just sitting on your lazy ass producing "meta analysis?"
    2
  52. What the ficken is wrong with landfills? Nothing. And you certainly haven't compared wind turbines, or solar, or lithium batteries, to any of the polluting (NOT CO2) effects of using fossil fuels. You work for an oil lobby perhaps? You sound like the constant fossil fuels Narrative.
    2
  53. You are HORSESHIT with you stupid comment about "Venice Italy" The sea levels have risen (Satellite data you dumbshit) and continue to rise (Satellite data you dumbshit) and the rise over YOUR lifespan is small enough to be unnoticeable to a dumbshit human like YOU. Wait a few thousand years you dumbshit. Du bist SCHEIẞE mit deinem dummen Kommentar über "Venedig Italien" Der Meeresspiegel ist gestiegen (Satellitendaten, du Dummkopf) und steigt weiter (Satellitendaten, du Dummkopf) und der Anstieg über DEINE Lebensspanne ist klein genug, um für einen dummen Menschen wie DICH nicht bemerkt zu werden. Warte ein paar tausend Jahre, du Dummkopf.
    2
  54. It could be you're 1) braindead? 2) an ignoramus? 3) too stupid to learn OR care? 4) a bot? I'm picking #3
    2
  55. Of course they are doing it. Duh.
    2
  56. Spot Ficken ON Dr. Hossenfelder. But we need to ACT NOW. The planet has a great amount of environmental INERTIA. It took 250 years for humans to create this mess and every year we delay and wait to get a grip and START the FIX is another year added to fixing this, all the while the planet warms and warms and warms.
    2
  57. on one hand you say "the validity of climate science" and the other hand you say "we will all die..." Which? Mr. Schizophrenic, which?
    1
  58. From you comment, nothing. What's your point? What "chart?" Ice core sample go 3 times as far back so what the fuck are you looking at?
    1
  59. The Mantra of conspiracy denial. Tangent from the issue. So you say you've uncovered the scam and call the UN liars when they say "Human activities, principally through emissions of greenhouse gases, have caused global warming, "
    1
  60. You are full of shit. We need to end the CO2 emissions and capture what we've released if we want to start dealing with climate change. Just because YOU are a poor POS doesn't mean the rest of us should be. Wake the fuck UP.
    1
  61.  @kforest2745  Utter horseshit excuse because you don't have the brains, don't care, and conspiracy leads your life.
    1
  62. Humanity has possessed the solutions now for over half a century.
    1
  63. Idiocy Breeds Faster Than Intelligence. The trust in Science slowly vanishing will continue.
    1
  64. What's wrong with change? (other than upsetting a bunch of fossil fuel industry CFOs Accountants and Bankers?)
    1
  65. Spot On. But failed? Forget that concept. They didn't even register for a STEM class. Never even tried to take a class and learn. The planet will continue to warm thanks to these numbnuts. But you're wrong about our species not lasting. Humans will be here our civilization may not. (what is the minimum number of humans necessary to maintain a civilization?)
    1
  66. Politicians? You're kidding right? The fossil fuel lobbyists, PACS, SPACS, Koch Brothers own our politicians. Pointless.
    1
  67. Let's face it you know Scheiße about our climate. THIS is what humans have done to control "nature:" https://sustainabilitymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/cropped-original.jpg This EXTRA co2 ABSORBS energy from our Sun, heating the planet. It's that fucking simple. Humanity CONTROLS the Earths Temperature. Wake the FICKEN up.
    1
  68. Stop voting for fossil fuel politicians funded into office by the MONEY of the fossil fuels industry.
    1
  69. Whoa! Very rarely does anyone comment on the possible ultimate end point of all of this. So, you got that correct. How to fix??
    1
  70. Give me a ficken break. YOU never guessed it would be the co2.
    1
  71. WEATHER is not CLIMATE. You took all that time to write blah blah blah.... you work for an oil lobby perhaps?
    1
  72. blah blah blah, PHYSICS determine not opinions. Still can't tell, you never say, manmade climate change real? or a "scam?" Which??? Just answer the ficken question without all of the weather analogies please, because most of it is just tangential side-crapola. How much co2 has humanity released into the atmosphere? What's the Keeling Curve? What's the natural periodicity of the co2 cycle on Earth? What's "radio-chemistry?" Where does it enter into the climate modeling? What's Black Body Theory? Does it enter into climate modeling? What's "radiative forcing?" What is a closed system? Is the Earth a closed system? What is the predominate molecule in our atmosphere responsible for the forecast warming? What molecule, in the next 100-200 years, will overtake that current predominate molecule? (And accelerate the warming) anomaly Until you can answer stuff like the above why don't you keep your big mouth SHUT? I suspect you tangential WEATHER commenters as being just another fossil fuel narrative BOT release upon the internet. bla bla bla, PHYSIK bestimmt nicht Meinungen. Können Sie immer noch nicht sagen, dass der menschengemachte Klimawandel real ist? Oder ein "Betrug"? Welche??? Beantworten Sie einfach die verdammte Frage ohne all die Wetter-Analogien, denn das meiste davon ist nur tangentiale Seitenkrass. Wie viel CO2 hat die Menschheit in die Atmosphäre freigesetzt? Was ist die Keeling-Kurve? Was ist die natürliche Periodizität des CO2-Kreislaufs auf der Erde? Was ist "Radiochemie"? Wo kommt sie in die Klimamodellierung ins Spiel? Was ist die Schwarzkörpertheorie? Fließt sie in die Klimamodellierung ein? Was ist ein geschlossenes System? Ist die Erde ein geschlossenes System? Was ist das vorherrschende Molekül in unserer Atmosphäre, das für die prognostizierte Erwärmung verantwortlich ist? Welches Molekül wird in den nächsten 100-200 Jahren das derzeit vorherrschende Molekül überholen? (Und die Erwärmung beschleunigen) Warum ist die globale Anomalie der Temperatur ein GLOBALES KLIMAPHÄNOMEN und die regionale ("Europa", "Afrika") ein LOKALES WETTERPHÄNOMEN? Ich vermute, dass ihr tangentialen WETTER-Kommentatoren nur eine weitere BOT-Veröffentlichung über fossile Brennstoffe im Internet seid.  @mobilityproject3485 
    1
  73. Like the ones you propagate?
    1
  74. HORSESHIT. Same old conspiracy denial ignoramus commenting on "we need the co2 because plants love it" crap. "Plants" have all the co2 they need and will continue to have it while we fix this fucking mess.  @Velvetspoonful 
    1
  75. What the fuck is "dead carbon?" Ever hear of the Keeling Curve? Plants ARE "flourishing" currently. That doesn't stop the planet from warming. Your head must be spinning from all of these fucking FACTS.
    1
  76. It's the future of YOUR descendants. You breed yet? Please please Dear God, say "no."  @bendranski6882 
    1
  77. Yah! Can't wait 'till they make the TRILLIONS every year generated by fossil fuels! MAGA-ON you ignoramus!!
    1
  78. Do you really think (try it!) that the invited flying to DAVOS are there to "save the planet?" Have you even ever looked at a list of the fucking attendees?
    1
  79. You are just plain WRONG. Atomic is the only energy source with the sufficiently low $/kwh that will ultimately fix this mess. And your mention of Fukushima is just nonsense, comparing an original water-cooled 65 year old design to a modern safe helium bed atomic reactor is just Scheiße denken. Fukushima should have been taken off-line and dismantled 50 years ago and the Japanese KNEW this. You are just WRONG.
    1
  80. The problem is the problem is very simple and YOU are brainwashed by upbringing, flunking out of high school, and parents who are equally idiots teaching their son their idiocy. https://youtu.be/sP2tUW0HDHA?si=oWJT-N_qX7Q8tnOB
    1
  81. Oh? What about the humans pumping 40 gigatons of co2 into the atmosphere every year that would have stayed UNDER the ground?
    1
  82. Wrong. All of those failed nuclear power plants were of the wrong types. The RIGHT Atomic is the ONLY solution out there working NOW with the necessary $/kwh (power density) that will solve this. Nope. The ONLY reason for the dislikes is that all of them are from ignoramuses. Climate change to them is just yet another conspiracy theory and too brainwashed and stupid to learn otherwise. We might be doomed.
    1
  83. Rebellion against what? I don't know, what you got? James Dean.
    1
  84. Duh, just what your fossil fuel overlords want you to do. WHO controls the heating prices? It ain't the "government." Wake UP.  @lucas3d676 
    1
  85. Sure, easy. 400-500 helium bed atomic piles along the coastlines, feeding the electrical grids, cracking seawater into hydrogen, and powering carbon capture around the clock. Anything else you want to know?  @aliendroneservices6621 
    1
  86. ha ha hee haw you ignoramus.
    1
  87. Nope, a hole.
    1
  88. Yah! You're correct! Let's see, easy Google! "Green renewables" = $3 Trillion yearly Fucking Fossil Fuels = $140 fucking TRILLION yearly. You are GENIUS!!!
    1
  89. OK, what the frack you doing to help fix this mess?
    1
  90. so what? how many trees you have when we started pumping out the c02? MORE.
    1
  91. NONE of what you suggest will fix this fucking fossil fuel mess.
    1
  92. So basically you're saying it's ALL a lie?
    1
  93. We control the climate stupid.
    1
  94. Why?
    1
  95. He has none. @eattherich1793 
    1
  96. You obviously just joined the conversation, congrats, shut up while you learn, THEN comment. We know what is happening. We know why it is happening. We know HOW to fix it. We know HOW to fix it FAST enough so it won't starve too many humans. The solutions have been here, and they work, now for over half a century.
    1
  97. What HORSESHIT. And an olde fart too, not surprising.
    1
  98. Tax whom? Show Me The Money.
    1
  99. OK, WHAT is the CAUSE of the lack of political will. Say it.
    1
  100. What about it? So what?
    1
  101. Sure they do, by TRAPPING heat, but still so little as to amount both for the contrail and the co2 to about 5% of humanity's contribution to global warming. So What? It's a piss in a high wind fart. Humans bring up and release 40 gigatons of co2 every year into the atmosphere. Stop it. And if we carbon capture all of that 40 gigatons we can still USE the fucking fossil fuels. duh. wake UP.  @campbellspainting 
    1
  102. Thanks for your WEATHER reporting.
    1
  103. YEP. Here, THIS is climate change: https://climatefeedback.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/download3.jpg Notice the RED line? WHY the spike at the end? Why is the RED line HIGHER than it has ever been for the past million years? What CHANGED? WHAT caused the CHANGE? (easy answer, look in your mirror) Notice the periodicity? Take a pencil with a sharp point and following the RED line, ask yourself at the END of the graph, where will that little BLUE line end up? Why do you believe that BLUE line will continue to do what it has done for the past MILLION years? (trick question, it WON'T)  @thepathnotfound 
    1
  104. they they they, who the FUCK are THEY?
    1
  105. You're a clown, what the ficken you talking about? "going to a singularity?" Why don't you take your singularity and find the TIME (ha ha a joke!!!) to read an IPCC Report?
    1
  106. Makes you all warm and happy to think (try it!) so doesn't it? Have you bred yet? Are your kids equally as stupid as you? Thanks for killing our Civilization you ignoramus. https://youtu.be/sP2tUW0HDHA?si=2IssD5ZqDkLSnzD6
    1
  107. There is NOTHING "made up" about a climate model. Why don't you take your superb analytic ability and give some details about the modeling errors and fallacies? Is it a forcing function? We've over-simplified the radiative forcing functions? Perhaps a second order approximation would be better? One of the coefficients? Error bounds of the measurements used as inputs? What is it exactly please? And please fucking SHOW your work, you know? The MATH.
    1
  108. I ask a very simple question and you respond like a bot. Very possible you don't know shit about anything science. What is a second order approximation by the fucking way bot??  @valarieknight7990 
    1
  109.  @jerryboics9550  Yes, bury it. As doing so doesn't INCREASE the c02 in the atmosphere. Duh. It's pollution not c02 warming the planet. Put the infrastructure in place to handle and stop the pollution? Yes. Of course. Works a fuck lot better than fossil fuel continuing to warm the planet. Wake the fuck up please.
    1
  110. Wow, so you obviously have calculated the ENERGY absorbed by the 2,400 GIGATONS of CO2 released by humans in only the past 250 years?? And came out with an answer that says "the planet isn't warming." Right? Please post your fucking MATH.
    1
  111. MAGA-ON Dude!
    1
  112. Can't figure out what the ficken you talking about. The S&P? Huh?? The correlation to manmade climate change??? Huh?????????????????????
    1
  113. Just you. Where that foil cap. I'm sure there must be several of them around your house.
    1
  114. You are just plain Ficken WRONG. The solutions have been here for over half a century. They work. Just Ficken BUILT IT.
    1
  115. blah blah blah, WHO is "running the show?" Name them. (bet my ficken carbon footprint you get it ficken wrong)
    1
  116. It's all part of the death spiral for the planet and humanity. What about it? Get off your lazy arse and help fix this ficken mess.
    1
  117. Whose? Say it. Name the names Hühnerscheiße.
    1
  118. No it won't, but you HAVE been brainwashed by Trump to hate something someone some group so you vote for hate.
    1
  119. Your lower GI track is trying to clear your BRAIN from your ASS.
    1
  120. Get some engineering education dude because you are a moron when it comes to HOW to fix this.
    1
  121. Sigh, wake UP please. Our civilization may end but it won't be for the next several thousand years. And THAT is the problem, only people can fix this and most people only think at the tip of their penis and their clits respectively. THAT is the PROBLEM. Seufz, wach bitte auf. Unsere Zivilisation mag untergehen, aber das wird erst in ein paar tausend Jahren der Fall sein. Und DAS ist das Problem, nur die Menschen können das lösen und die meisten Menschen denken nur an die Spitze ihres Penis bzw. ihrer Klitoris. DAS ist das PROBLEM. https://youtu.be/sP2tUW0HDHA?si=oWJT-N_qX7Q8tnOB
    1
  122. Wrong. YOU obviously haven't done or even looked at the numbers. Wake UP. Wind and Solar are transitions to non-co2-emitting power. Atomic is the ONLY energy source that will get humanity out of this mess. What's YOUR degree in? Lawn Mower Repair? Sounds like it from your idiocy comment.
    1
  123. Why don't YOU do it? Or just fucking READ about the experiment done a . Didn't someone explain this in your lawn mower repair class? YOU "checked out" about the time you were potty-trained apparently. \
    1
  124. HORSESHIT. Nothing "vague" from the IPCC reports. Why don't you try READING them?
    1
  125. Wow. You are just a plain fucking LIE. CO2 is at the HIGHEST ever in RECORDED history. You don't even know what the fucking term means do you? "geological history" MORON. Wow! Sie sind einfach nur eine verdammte LÜGE. Der CO2-Gehalt ist so hoch wie noch nie in der Geschichte. Du weißt nicht einmal, was der verdammte Begriff bedeutet, oder? „Geologische Geschichte“ MORON.
    1
  126. Wow, are you full of horseshit or just a liar. First sentence just plain factually wrong. And what climate scientist has EVER said to give up "heating, AC, personal computers, or give up fucking ANYTHING? Who? Name please.
    1
  127. @rsmdogtrailer7145 You are simply wrong. And it DOES make you stupid. Thanks for your non-concern. Have you bred yet? Hope not. My God, "who released the c02 in the past?" You must suck the intelligence out of houseplants when you enter a roo
    1
  128. Nope. The ONLY reason for the dislikes is that all of them are from ignoramuses. Climate change to them is just yet another conspiracy theory and too brainwashed and stupid to learn otherwise. We might be doomed.
    1
  129. You forgot a decimal point you ignoramus. TEN BILLION years.
    1
  130. It has been so politicized by the FOSSIL FUEL NARRATIVE numbnuts. The solutions have been here now for over half a fucking century, waiting to be built. The Mantra of conspiracy denial. "travel" Tangent from the issue.
    1
  131. It is "productive" in terms of slowing the looming catastrophe. It sounds like you do it, I do it, but even if ALL 8+ BILLION people on this planet did it, it WOULD NOT CHANGE THE EVENTUAL RISE IN THE WARMING OF THE PLANET. Mentions of this is just what the fossil fuel Narrative is all about distraction from the solution. The ISSUE of manmade climate change is SOLVING it. There is 2,400 gigatons of co2 in the atmosphere because of humanity. We did it. It's effect is happening before our lives where it will top out we're trying to forecast. The co2 is in the atmosphere NOW, it must be REMOVED take the Keeling Curve back down to where it should be <280ppm Planting trees, reducing our use of fossil fuels, EVs, solar panels on the roofs, going "green," going "local," are simply TRANSITIONAL to the ultimate and ONLY solution: Stop Emitting the CO2. Remove What Man has Released. That's IT.  @civissollicitus6767 
    1
  132. For YOU personally? That's called WEATHER. For the GLOBE? That's called CLIMATE change.
    1
  133. You simply refuse to LEARN don't you? "on the Pacific from Oregon to the bottom of Mexico" where you have been and seen happen is STILL the WEATHER. Manmade climate change is REAL and you talk about the WEATHER. Every hear of the theory that water always seeks it's own, lowest, "level?" Take your Oregon to Mexico sea levels, then average it with all of the other local regions on the globe, AFTER accounting for gravitational (Earth and Moon and Sun) effects and of course centripetal effects (different heights equate to different centrifugal force), ALL must be normalized before calculating that GLOBAL AVERAGE. do this please, then get back to me with your answer, sea levels UP? or DOWN?, and then go back historically and estimate to compare to the current global average, and please show your MATH. (or you could just TRUST NOAA, they're pretty smart about measurements) or, let's cut to the chase, global average sea levels have been rising for the past 120 years, long enough to declare it as a trend.  @stevenwillie2782 
    1