Comments by "bruno bond" (@mrunning10) on "Americans are surprisingly rational about climate change, new study finds" video.

  1. Wrong Wrong and Wrong. "California can limit gas lawn mowers but not private jets for example." California CAN limit private jets and has chosen NOT to do so. WHY? WHY? and WHY?
    4
  2. Spot On. OK, WHY do legislators "go so far as to disallow questioning of the science?" WHY? Say it.
    3
  3. The fossil fuel Narrative "wraps it in politically polarizing language." NOT the science nor the scientists.
    3
  4. MAGA-ON Dude!! IGNORAMUSES UNITED!
    3
  5. Spot Ficken ON. Finally the TRUTH. Minor change however to your statement. Congress, for most of the history of the U.S., not a "few" but rather the voting MAJORITY has been election funded by the fossil fuel industry. Evidence of this? Have we ever really fixed this mess? NO. Does the Keeling Curve continue to rise? YES. Fix THIS and we FIX manmade climate change. What about the other countries say the MAGA deniers? "What about them?" should be the reply. The US still leads, the US still sets the example for the world, the US is still the greatest country in the world. Any holdout countries it will be easy to solve with ONE conversation from a President who is NOT a paid-for pussy whipped narcissist interested only in getting elected. It would go like this: "Hello Xi Ping Pong, you commie Bastard, start your transition now please." "You don't tell me what to do! Sorry I can't do that" "OK, you ever here the phrase 'Total Embargo?' One stroke of the Presidents Executive Order pen and we collapse China. Xi will think we're bluffing. One week after doing this Xi will call the President and tell him please to stop. Problem ficken solved. (oh no! what about the US?, we won't have all those cheap Chinese plastic pieces of crap we buy so much of? Sorry American Consumers, this will only last a week, NONE OF IT IS NECESSARY, WHAT WE BUY FROM CHINA, NONE IS NECESSARY FOR THE SECURITY AND SURVIVAL OF THE UNITED STATES.)
    2
  6. Because 80 million of the populace of the United States are clinically insane.
    2
  7. Don't Look Up. duh
    2
  8. Ask Dr. Moore how much energy is absorbed by the 2,400 gigatons of co2 humanity has released. Ask him to SHOW you the MATH. Dr. Moore, fired be Greenpeace and then greased-up and took the fossil fuels CHECK to promote the fossil fuels narrative. And you don't trust Dr. Hossenfelder, who is paid by viewers on YouTube? And NOT by ANY "green" or "renewable" company or lobby. You are NOT a rational human being, but rather a rationalizing cognitively dissonant ignorant human being. Try, try waking up.
    1
  9. Exactly, you don't even have to argue or "debate" the science.
    1
  10. Jesus is watching YOU kill God's Gift of Mother Earth and Jesus will JUDGE. You.  @kc4cvh 
    1
  11. A Climate Model FORESCASTS a global average temperature, it has been, within error bounds, correct. All the other crap you speak is from journalists attempting to sensationalize for the purpose of selling or for ratings. Regarding you old memory, it's old and incorrect. Go get those "climate change was promoting" newscasts? articles? what?? and re-read them. terms like "may" and "could" in your fossilized memory turn into "will" and "ice age"  @samael2112 
    1
  12. OK, denier, you tell us "what's happening?" Please.
    1
  13. I've never understood this "hypocrite" theory. Jets (all of them) contribute about less than 5% to manmade global warming. It ain't the problem that needs to be solved. So you're saying last years 4.4 BILLION airline passengers are all 'hypocrites' (yourself as well) about manmade global warming? So solving this in your view is to stop flying and half the population becomes Pennsylvania Amish? thank you for you useless opinion numbnuts.
    1
  14. You're full of excrement. Manmade climate change is real and it may kill us. Thanks for you no ficken help.
    1
  15. WRONG. How can stupid people (our legislators) question anything when they have no knowledge? WHO briefs them? WHO prepares their questioning? WHO suggests whom to call to testify? WHO supplied them with the MONEY to get elected? WHO? (and it ain't the World Health Organization)  @A.G.P.115 
    1
  16. Any "debate" just prolongs the TRILLIONS in revenues accumulating in the fossil fuels bank accounts.  @JCAtkeson3 
    1
  17. While at the same time they vote for fossil fuel funded politicians.
    1
  18. Wired for ignorance. Idiocy Breeds Faster than Intelligence.
    1
  19. So you're saying, manmade climate change is real? But as human beings we're to ignorant greedy and evil to fix it? That it? @@firecatblazekitty9926
    1
  20.  @vincentpauly7850  So "people" are acting, MILLIONS of them, STUPIDLY? It is just plain STUPID to ignore science, however one rationalizes it, when living in a technological world where that technology keeps you alive.
    1
  21.  @lindabowman2868  It can get even worse, let's reverse the "thinking" on the MAGA Morons, if you're not "conscious" are you even an alive human being?
    1
  22. Well? What IS wrong with the brains of climate deniers?
    1
  23. YOU.
    1
  24. Not in your life time nor theirs. So, they don't care. All clued in now?
    1
  25. MORON.  @JailGoogleTraitors 
    1
  26. You have one final way of not being a disappointment. By returning your carbon to the Earth so a newer smarter more caring generation can replace you and fix this fucking mess.
    1
  27. Did your two classes in Lawn Mower Repair mention a concept called INERTIA?
    1