Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Putin LOSES CONTROL. INNER CIRCLE BETRAYS Him. Russian TOP GENERAL ARRESTED. China SWITCHES SIDES" video.

@xylogeist91 A gay Croatian; but why tell us?
1
@xylogeist91 A gay Croatian with a baby, did you adopt?
1
"Ukraine is now the most experienced and versatile fighting force in the world" Well if that's true then they don't need our money and the UK government can mind it's own business (a bit better than they are) and attend to the civil unrest brewing here.
1
Great idea, then he can actually stick his own head up his ayrse.
1
Look he wants money; that's why he does the whole "Russian" act and stirs up hatred. He lives in Canada (he says); obviously hates Slavs (gives out Ukrainian logistics; hates Russians) but this is clearly a great "money-making" opportunity for him (and look at his obvious enjoyment, over a human tragedy; it's ghoulish). I just come here for the hate. The catch-phrase; the clicking finger thing before asking for money and the production values, suggest to me (bit of a jump) that he's government sponsored already. While on the face of it, if I did what he's doing my home country would likely jail me (so I doubt he's even Russian). Seems to have found a target audience tho' who ignore his previous dud predictions; it's amazing!
1
China has said, "Do not try to involve us in American power games!" (so better watch your mouth). America owes China a lot of money and China isn't interested in their interests.
1
@mombaassa You seem to be just parroting the American neo-conservative line; but China builds things: roads; bridges; a lot of American product and, in that respect, are perfectly reliable; while you are either unobservant, or easily convinced, because clearly AMERICA is the world's most powerful "fair-weather friend" (just ask Libya; Iraq, or even Russia, all their former allies). I'm not changing the subject (and I'm not a bot) If you spread lies or unjust criticism of that one party communist country it's considered "loss of face" and they aren't just going to take it like Russia (that's why the corporate media and individuals like this fake Russian are dangerous at this time, it's because they tell lies). China did not start this conflict; they aren't supplying weapons to either side and their peace plan was rejected. The neo-cons and you want to involve China, why? Or, in other words, where is the evidence for your derogatory statement(?); because the evidence that you are wrong is overwhelming. "China has good trading relationships with both Russia and Ukraine" (which is true). "It would be naive to demand China takes sides" (which is true) and their business model "belt and road" is vastly superior to America's "perpetual war" model (is that not true too?). So 滚蛋 (roll away you turtle's egg). For a valid statement you require proof, so where is it?
1
@Maplelust Then don't talk to me. If you enjoy the fake Russian and his hate-filled fiction don't let me stop you, but accuse China unjustly and you make an enemy for life.
1
@mombaassa Your statement is hearsay; you offer no proof to substantiate it and the onus of proof is on you (not me). American companies rely on Chinese manufacturing (claiming it's cost effective); China has built key infrastructure in Africa and Asia (which is a long term investment) and won't be told where or how they buy oil. The American far-right don't like that: they prefer a military industrial complex; they send weapons and money to corrupt countries; fiddle with exchange rates and can't even cover interest on national debt. By funding training and arming groups they later call terrorists; toppling regimes and walking away after destroying countries on flimsy excuses (save the children? 50,000 kids dead in Iraq/Afghanistan). There are the powerful fairweather friends and the evidence to prove it. Since Russia just crossed of $30 Billion in African debt; it's clear their media stories of Russia's imminent economic collapse are laughable! The point I'm making is that while the msm feel free to smear: Russia; Trump or Biden, if they try that (on) with China; expect a violent response. As for Ukraine, if Russia moves to full deployment the UK better watch out.
1
He prefers you pay to see them.
1
Just like his accent... but don't forget to send this impostor money I hear he's saving up for a tank...
1
I agree.
1
It's not about the (old) USSR; Western interest have invested a lot of (public) money in getting Ukraine to join; the Russian speaking regions aren't interested in that and Russia did make it clear (repeatedly) that there would be serious consequences if Ukraine gave up neutrality. If peace breaks out those Western interests will lose (billions), so they've blocked negotiations and really it's the globalists that haven't realized countries aren't going to follow rules that say they lose. It's the Western economy that's falling apart, haven't you noticed? If you look at the map, it's those regions or it's global nuclear war; that's what it's about. Btw The adults are showing restraint; waiting for those Western interests to run out of money or interest and find a new cause; but if the nationalist get their way they'll be wanting full deployment and likely a proposal for a nuclear exchange (something like that). I'd say Neuland and her cohorts should not have engineered regime change in Ukraine (2014); it's opened a Pandora's box and possibly started WW3. So good luck with that.
1
All very suspect...
1