Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "GENIUS MOVE! Ukraine DEPLOYS "INVINCIBLE MARINES" and ENTERS CRIMEA. Everything CHANGES NOW" video.

  1. The owners of YouTube (Google) no doubt have to be careful about information on their platform; otherwise (the American Senate say) government will have to police/ regulate content (I don't think anyone wants that). This chap I'd call "The Unbelievable Russian Dude" is a mine of misinformation, with "clickbait" titles ("It's over!... said that half a dozen times); falsely claims he can't show clips (available on YouTube) wants to sell access on another site; I'm all for free speech, but the ex-crypto trader based in Canada is simply trying to sell hate against (allegedly) his own countrymen); while (allegedly) revealing Ukrainian logistics; I would ignore his latest sob-story; his loyalty is simply to his own pocket. So it may be YouTube having a friendly word; due to laws (Google supported) three strikes and you're out; I haven't reported this chap, but I find plenty of reasons to complain about what he's doing. He seems to have stopped gloating over the deaths of others as much; others have complained he's trying to sell freely available stuff and his rrrridiculous accent and catch phrase is (imo) just a bad actor "trying it on". I'm assuming Google are concerned (primarily with the bottom line) and that he's making them look bad; his own "history" shows he is clearly lying.
    2
  2. No, he's just trying to sell freely available stuff. Although his sob-story did touch my frozen heart (sniff). He's a con-artist!
    1
  3. He should give up. Talks a load of tripe...
    1
  4. No, I believe Google sees all; he's an unreliable narrator and the Senate have said if social media doesn't clean up their act government will step in. Selling hate and freely available clips is not fine; posting misinformation causes trouble; Google are not going to let one "blagger" upset their apple-cart (no way).
    1
  5. This allegation is unproven; it's also a serious matter to accuse another of murder (even "murder by proxy") and while people are entitled to their opinion (unless you're Assange) on a public forum that sort of behavior is likely to attract regulators (either site moderators or government). Since CNN has posted footage of an aircraft falling from the sky; I believe this chap I'd call "The Unbelievable Russian Dude" is trying to direct people to a pay-site and his "sob-story" is not true. As matters stand: Russia reports a plane crash North of Moscow; ten dead; Prigozhin listed on passenger manifesto. I would be wary of those who rush to accuse as crash investigations take months; DNA testing takes weeks and it's clear to me this "turd" just wants money. I do agree it's a bit odd (killing ten to get one, even the mafia don't accept "collateral damage"; it's bad for business); Prigohzin seems to have a list of enemies longer than JFK; the Pentagon say aircraft wasn't hit by missile (believe that if you wish); Putin is not considered "Commander in Chief" (that's more an American thing), the Russian military are in command and I'm guessing Youtube will block "rabble rousers" as it reflects badly on them. I don't think Putin murdered Prigozhin; based on no evidence; he may have been a "loose cannon" but he was their loose cannon. Also (don't ask) that's not how "business" is conducted in Russia (they would just replace him), that's my idle speculation (until we know more).
    1
  6. The owner of YouTube is Google, who are about as capitalist as one can get; so is this bad actor pretending to be Russian (selling hate and misinformation for money). That will likely be why YouTube have had a word... him teaching people to hate... while your post strongly suggests you've never met a communist.
    1
  7. Trying to selling hatred and lies probably, it makes the owners of YouTube look bad and nobody should want the government to have to police social media (but Senate said they will). Don't you know this chap just makes stuff up? (There are others doing similar things). Can you imagine yourself gloating over the deaths of your fellow countrymen? He does... He's just in it for the money; it's making everyone look bad, Google don't need to stand for that. I think that's the problem (him).
    1