Comments by "ItCouldBe Lupus" (@itcouldbelupus2842) on "Pod Save the World"
channel.
-
123
-
68
-
60
-
60
-
54
-
53
-
44
-
43
-
38
-
36
-
34
-
32
-
31
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
19
-
18
-
@nickthepostpunk5766 The UK is considered a hostile country for trans people especially for trans children (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). Trans healthcare under the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has long been criticized for causing harm to trans people, with reports of pathologization, coercion and harm in NHS healthcare services (Horton, Citation2022d, Citation2022a; Pearce, Citation2018).
Since the launch of the Cass Review in 2020, the situation for trans children in the UK has continued to decline (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). In 2022 the UK Minister for Health called for clinicians to look for evidence of “what has caused children to be trans,” citing the Cass Review to claim that “identifying as trans” is likely to be a response to “child sex abuse” (Milton, Citation2022). The Cass Review was cited by the British government to justify plans to exclude trans people from legislation to ban conversion therapy (British Psychological Society, Citation2022)
Despite the incredibly strict requirements for existing research to be considered in the systematic reviews, the final report trades freely in citations of poor quality or/and politically motivated work, and even incorrectly cites literature in order to support their desired outcome.
The report repeatedly cites Ken Zucker (1985)[11] to support its assertions about the number of people who regret transition. Zucker is widely known for his heavily criticised claim that 80% of young people ‘desist’ from being trans, as well as his use of practices likened to conversion therapy. They back this up with Thomas Steensma’s (2013)[12] study on factors associated with desistance and persistence. Steensma has clarified publicly that the study should not be used to calculate rates of persistence or desistance[13], as its research design (aimed at studying characteristics of persisting trans patients) risks inflating the number of desisters. The Cass Report uses it to do just this several times.
If I give you the titles of the papers these quotes are from will you go read them?
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@nickthepostpunk5766 Once again, projection, you have done exactly what you are accusing me of, repeatedly.
You've fired out claims, repeated them without citing evidence, ignored over half of the things I've said, repeated misinformation and have not engaged in good faith to the claims I've made.
You are now running away because you can't acknowledge that you haven't looked at any of the criticisms of the review and don't plan on doing so, which can only be explained by anti trans bias, which you have repeatedly demonstrated in this thread.
When you claim a widely criticized review is correct just because it says what you wanted it to say and refuse to listen to or acknowledge anything to the contrary, then you are biased and not engaging in good faith.
Very disappointing that you lack the humility to admit when you are wrong, refuse to acknowledge facts that go against your narrative and cannot accept for even a moment that maybe you aren't right about everything and you should consider a different perspective.
But this has all been very typical of anti trans activists like yourself.
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8