Comments by "" (@tekannon7803) on "Retired general makes prediction about Putin's plan in Ukraine" video.

  1. The legendary John King interviews Major General (Ret.) James "Spider" Marks. The distinguished military man's analysis should make everyone of us wake up to what is happening before our eyes and why Mariupol must... not... fall. General Marks, please use your considerable skills in analyzing how to drive a wedge to the steel plant in Mariupol and then when the civilians are freed, continue the wedge to the Sea of Azov to cut the Russian land bridge and come around to attack the eastern and western flanks of the Russian forces. Mariupol is the key to dividing Ukraine up like a Domino pizza. Why has Mariupol been ground to rubble? Because the prize the Russians really want is to control the Dnieper river, the 'Mississippi' of the region. It's the only river that empties into the Black Sea allowing ships to send grain and minerals and everything else to the Black Sea, through the straits of Turkey into the mediteranean and out to the world's oceans. The Russian Empire will whither and die if it can't control the Dnieper river. The Dombas region, land bridge, Crimea, Moldova are cherries on the cake to divert our attention from the real reason they are trying to send the Ukraine back to the stone age. An American analyst is where I've gotten my information from and it sounds right. Why would there be such a slaughter of innocent civilians if they weren't trying to erase the Ukrainian culture from the Earth. I repeat: Russia's main objective is the Dnieper and we must now ask General Marks and his fellow military strategists to relay as soon as possible to the Ukrainians how to take Mariupol back and cut the Russian land bridge in two. Do that and you've got the Russian army on the run. It's doable. Let's help them...
    5
  2. @Mike Dawson GGGGGGGGGGGreat to hear from you. Could you be more specific? We all want to know the nuts and bolts of what's going on. You must have the answers if you find my analysis incorrect. Please, tell us what we need to know...
    1