Comments by "Mike W" (@mikew764) on "Federal Judge Restricts Biden Administration Communication With Social Media Companies" video.

  1.  @anthonyjoseph4992  the lawsuit simply asked the government to block the administration, and this Judge temporary did
    2
  2. It’s not a big. It’s a dog and pony show.
    2
  3. Don’t act like you read the constitution😂
    1
  4. @@tatersncorn Just because the lawsuit says a thing doesn’t make it true!
    1
  5.  @evanjrowley  you have NO RIGHTS on private Internet platforms
    1
  6.  @kimberlygarrett1485  the government IS NOT censoring free speech🤣😂
    1
  7.  @kimberlygarrett1485  having “public”subscriptions doesn’t make it “public” 🤣😂
    1
  8.  @kimberlygarrett1485  buying a ticket to the movies doesn’t make the movie theater a public venue🤣😂
    1
  9.  @kimberlygarrett1485  their private companies, operating their own private products. Fact
    1
  10.  @leeadickes7235  lol you have NO idea what you're talking about lol
    1
  11.  @kimberlygarrett1485  <---Cant handle the truth
    1
  12.  @kimberlygarrett1485  what about social media being the product of private companies do you not understand?
    1
  13.  @kimberlygarrett1485  did you forget to look up the definition of privacy??
    1
  14.  @kimberlygarrett1485  Yes, and Walmart can deny or remove you from their store anytime they want lol
    1
  15.  @kimberlygarrett1485  The admin IS NOT calling them and telling them about "private matters"
    1
  16.  @kimberlygarrett1485  NOTHING you do on Social media is private. lol
    1
  17.  @kimberlygarrett1485  The platform owns everything you do on it. Read the TOS lol
    1
  18.  @kimberlygarrett1485  Biden is not telling SM what to ban. That is 100% false
    1
  19.  @kimberlygarrett1485  Using Walmart is not a right
    1
  20.  @evanjrowley  the bill of rights has literally nothing to do with this
    1
  21.  @kimberlygarrett1485  The company is private. YOU'RE not the company!
    1
  22.  @kimberlygarrett1485  You are just using the product, and have to follow the TERMS OF SERVICE when you do.
    1
  23. PS Walmart does not need just cause to deny you. lol
    1
  24. They can deny you for no reason at all.
    1
  25.  @kimberlygarrett1485  You're deeply confused
    1
  26.  @kimberlygarrett1485  Ignorance is bliss after all! lol
    1
  27.  samgriess438  how unAmerican of you
    1
  28.  samgriess438  How would guillotines solve America’s problems?🤣😂
    1
  29.  samgriess438  executing people you personally don’t agree with isn’t going to solve America’s problems
    1
  30.  samgriess438  literally against what America stands for😂🤣
    1
  31. Are you really so gullible us to believe everything you see on the Internet?
    1
  32.  @papabear9481  what’s the difference between the Internet and your favorite news echo chamber?🤣😂
    1
  33.  @papabear9481  it’s literally the same people hahaha
    1
  34. We both know it won’t be upheld
    1
  35. Because the government isn’t doing anything there accused of
    1
  36. They literally haven’t done anything😂
    1
  37.  @anthonyjoseph4992  trump is absolutely going to prison
    1
  38.  @anthonyjoseph4992  how do I know they didn’t do anything? The complete and total lack of evidence that they did something
    1
  39.  @anthonyjoseph4992  it was a judge, not a justice btw
    1
  40.  @clovertx901  the Twitter files literally show the Biden administration not doing anything
    1
  41.  @anthonyjoseph4992  but they provided absolutely no specific evidence of any government/social media involvement
    1
  42.  @anthonyjoseph4992  I really don’t think you understand how this works
    1
  43.  @anthonyjoseph4992  correct that is what happened. Happens that way all the time.
    1
  44.  @anthonyjoseph4992  this wasn’t a trial ruling. It was an injunction.
    1
  45.  @anthonyjoseph4992  a Judge does not have to see evidence in order to make an injunctive ruling
    1
  46.  @anthonyjoseph4992  a Judge simply has to accept the plaintiffs argument, at face value
    1
  47.  @anthonyjoseph4992  that’s why the injunction is temporary in the first place
    1
  48.  @anthonyjoseph4992  but thank you for demonstrating the fact that you have no idea how the system works
    1
  49. Social media platforms are not influenced by the government
    1
  50. This is just another GOP, dog and pony show
    1
  51. @@tatersncorn funny how the lawsuit doesn’t a provide any specific instances of government involvement🤣😂
    1
  52.  @rhondatapley18  you literally have no idea what you’re talking about
    1
  53. @@tatersncorn there is literally no evidence that the government is influencing social media companies
    1
  54. @@tatersncorn FACT
    1
  55. @@tatersncorn it’s not about beliefs. it’s about objective fact
    1
  56. @@tatersncorn WHERE is the evidence that the government is influencing social media companies?!
    1
  57. @@tatersncorn why do you believe some thing without evidence?
    1
  58. None of this is actually happening. You understand that right?
    1
  59. The government is not having social media companies suppress content
    1
  60. There’s literally no proof the administration is making social media companies do anything
    1
  61. The answer is no
    1
  62. You have absolutely no freedoms on private Internet platforms😂
    1
  63. That’s not how anything works
    1
  64.  @rhondatapley18  not even close to the same thing🤣😂
    1
  65.  @rhondatapley18  now you’re trying to argue that Google and Apple, or restricting access based on race?! 🤣😂
    1
  66.  @rhondatapley18  it wasn’t even a private bus company! It was a public bus!! 🤣😂
    1
  67.  @kimberlygarrett1485  You have NO IDEA how this works lol
    1